Jump to content
SAU Community

Sema 2008 (las Vegas) Gt-r Pic's....& Promo Girls


Recommended Posts

oh and also your garage is nuts!!

Re Garage, thanks. The 996TT has a few mods......very happy with it, the M3 is an Individual package.....great daily driver. Plan to pick up a new GT-R late 2009.

Will be back at SEMA on Friday...will get a few more GT-R pics.

Ledgendary first post mate!!!

I can see your going to be very welcome around here...

and you don't have to post Only GTR pics, feel free to put up anything that is worth it..

A porsche turbo owner buying a GTR, mmm

Why exactly are you buying one over an already existing great car in your garage? (Asking to hear a buyers view, not a journo's)

He didn't say he was selling the porsche....... might want both, not one over the other..

I know if I could I would..

Ledgendary first post mate!!!

I can see your going to be very welcome around here...

and you don't have to post Only GTR pics, feel free to put up anything that is worth it..

He didn't say he was selling the porsche....... might want both, not one over the other..

I know if I could I would..

lol, i didnt say he was selling the porsche. I agree with you, porka and a GTR in the garage - that would be awesome!!! :)

A porsche turbo owner buying a GTR, mmm

Why exactly are you buying one over an already existing great car in your garage? (Asking to hear a buyers view, not a journo's)

I plan to replace my M3 next year (I'll be keeping the 996TT). I have looked at several options...GT3RS, another M3, C63, but the GT-R has the looks, performance & reasonable price point. The GT-R will be used as my daily driver, I spend a large amount of time OS so it will clock up only 5-8,000 km's/yr. Was also considering buying & keeping a USA based car, either a near new Gallardo Superleggera or GT3RS. The prices we pay in Australia are outrageous....I looked at 2 very low km 430's last week each asking between USD 145-155K.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...