Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've also converted my Xanavi TV unit to the triple guages but the're not connected/powered because the Xanavi harness doesn't match the triple guages obviously...

If anyone knows an auto sparky in Sydney who can wire this up properly so that the triple guages work please let us know. I know I need to get the harness from Nissan and the part number .. Someone mentioned a boost sensor is also needed, does anyone know the part number for it?

Delta you can get the harness from a wrecker just dont pay any more for it than $40 delivered because you can get one from nissan for that price and the same with the boost sender unit, you will have a plug for it in your engine bay near the brake booster. I have got mine nealy done but i cant find a signal for the boost or the oil temp, the others were ok to find, just need to find the right colour wires for the boost and oil temp and will be sweet. ps there is a guy wrecking a r34 gtt on these forums. I think he has sold the gauges but you might be able to get the harness and boost sender from him.

  • 3 weeks later...
The part # for the sub harness for the tripple meter is 24018 AA500 in case you need it (its about 40cm long with one female plug on one end, that goes into the guages and one male plug on the other end with 6 wires)

Hey mate. Thx for the part number it really helped. I took it down to the Nissan dealer & they found the part i was after. Only problem is that there isnt any left in australia at the moment. They are charging $45 for the harness plus $90 for postage as they would have to import it straight from japan.

Does anyone have any ideas for a workaround for this? Any other easily accesible parts that i could use to bodge together a home-made harness? Or any other places in Aus that may have one? If i cant find anything, ill just have to order the part from nissan, bit expensive though.

Thanks guys. :dry:

  • 2 months later...
  • 3 years later...

Hey guys,

Been through the site and am still coming up with more questions then answers. And now so I don't get beasted for starting a new thread, I'm reviving an old one.

I bought my new 1998 r34 gtt and the guy had switched the stock triple gauges with the super cheap auto calibre vacuum, water temp and voltage gauges.

I've gone and bought the stock ones and upon switching it out I can't seem to find the plug that goes straight into the back. There are a few plugs back there however none of them fit and I'm stumped.

I did come across mention of a wiring harness part. Part #24018 AA500

Would that be a harness that plugs into the current ones in the car to then directly fit into the true gauge back plug?

Any help would be appreciated.

Cheers,

Matthew

  • 5 months later...

Holy thread revival batman!

Just wanted to know if anyone would take a photo of the plug?

Also would an N/A have the plug? minus the boost sensor of course. Looking to get rid of the Xanavi, this is probably the best route to go down. Hoping to drop a det in there oneday as its a GT4 and I do like the car.

  • 9 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...