Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've had the Skyline for about 3 nearly 4 years now and own the bugger outright.... We are having to think of a more practical car :(and something in the Aust. market (lower cost of insurance). So what do you get for $25k after you've owned a Skyline? Yes I know it's true that most things pale into insignificance compared to one, but the change is inevitable.... Any suggestions?

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

my friend sold his s15 and he wanted something a bit cheaper and definitely more practical, he looked at the rexy wagon for a while. a tonne of bang and a lot of bootspace!

i'm cursed with never being satisfied.. next i want an M3, then an E55 and finally a 911t! then i will be able to sleep well at night hehe

Not sure about insurance... but an Audi A4 turbo, or maybe the V6 one. A little vague on the straight ahead but very nice cars.

Or an E36 325i, i would consider a Holden but too many aftermarket susp/engine parts which would mean it would cost me a fortune to modify as i wouldnt be able to help myself.

Audi RS4 - hands down the best station wagon ever made!

For those that don't know it's an 6 cylinder DOHC twin turbo intercooled monster (sound familiar?)

power wise it's 280kW@6100rpm and 440Nm@2500rpm

0-100 in 4.9.

not bad for a "family" car :)

edit: forgot it's 6speed manual and AWD :)

there's an RS6 which is basically the same, just not a station wagon.

how much are they?

From memory they were sold in limited numbers (like 15 or something in Oz) and were almost 200grand. Oh and noone has mentioned that Porsche actually built them, hence the Porsche logos on the brake calipers.

A nice Audi that may be worth a look if you have to have some GO, would be a '94 model S2 or S4. (2door/4door) They have 4wd, turbo 5 cylinder engines and the tuff Audi look. 4 years ago 40grand got you close, no idea of what they are worth now.

Based on the 100 quattro (later re-badged the A6), the S4 replaced that car's V6 with the venerable five-cylinder, iron-block engine. Equipped with a 20-valve alloy head, KKK K24 turbo, external wastegate and air/air intercooler, the 2.2 litre engine boasted immense low-down torque - no less than 350Nm was available at just 1950 rpm. And, if the driver was prepared to put his or her foot right down to the floor, an over-boost function kicked in, with intake pressure rocketing to 16 psi and torque rising still further to 380Nm at 2100 rpm. With 169kW available, the 1650kg leather-and-carbon-fibre trimmed cabin would then be propelled to 100 km/h in 6.8 seconds....and with a 6 speed manual.

1143_7mg.jpg

But my preference is the S2.. but you may a well keep the Skyline

1143_8mg.jpg

Woops, just had a look... i suppose i was dreaming that they had dropped into the 20s (Still around 40k if you can find one):)

Audi A4s fall into the price bracket though.

Speaking of Volvos, i just looked up the T5s, 5cyl turbo, manual (FWD???). Wagons start at 20k, sedans from around 22k on up

Eg .Volvo 1997 S70 T5 sedan, Turbo, in green with beige leather and suede, all electrics, alloy wheels, airbags, ABS brakes, 81808kms 26k

Am i going to be stoned to death for suggesting cars with a euro flavour... perhaps go with the Forrester, only i woudlnt be able to resist the temptation to modify them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
    • Hmmm, interesting. Makes me wonder whether there is bias as well. It's the cheapest fuel, so it is used for all kinds of ill-maintained shitboxes which are bound to have issues regardless. Nicer cars tend to require higher octane rated fuel and can't use it anyway. FWIW, the official NSW E10 facts page is decent. 
×
×
  • Create New...