Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What dyno graph are you looking at?

At 2500rpm it's only making 130hp atw

G.J meant there was a power band of 2.5k where its making in excess of 500hp ie from 5000rpm to 7500rpm

Your obviously not reading it right because at 2500rpm its making more like 70hp not 130hp.

G.J meant there was a power band of 2.5k where its making in excess of 500hp ie from 5000rpm to 7500rpm

Your obviously not reading it right because at 2500rpm its making more like 70hp not 130hp.

yeah and what I meant was the power band is narrow because there is no point using that last 1500 rpm.. power goes DOWN, markedly.

So you need to change gears at 6000, otherwise you lose.. the rest of that plot is a waste of paper. A tuned rb26 you can change pretty

much at redline, the drop off is so mild and only the last 400rpm.

sure it does 500hp from 5000 rpm ... but only for 1000 rpm of usable revs!

Quoting Mr.Alex

Hi Guys!

Thoght i'd share my big block evo experience with you.

Got the engine tuned and dynoed 2 months ago, been to the track for 2 days and the only thing I can say is that this is one crazy engine, all that tourque is just amazing on the track, pulls so hard after 3500rpms that i barely ever go below 4th gear.

i dont know if the scale on the dyno chart is correct cause the car is a beast after just 3500rpms, pulls just so hard i can hear my seats crack

motor11.jpg

motor12.jpg

motor3.jpg

motor8.jpg

Its a build from a local tuning shop here in Sweden, Autotech as said in the sheet :D They know their stuff, had time to to talk somewhat with em when a friend of mine mapped his Autronic controlled WRX STI on ethanol. Had this one in at the time.. gives you the creeps.... Got a couple of Evo's around here with 'big' hp's, many of them mapped at Autotech :bunny:

i bet thats at only 2 wheels though and probably at the fronts... right?

Erm but yeah i like the manii also :P but geez 2.5k US is alott

good work

Edited by Mr_GaZZa

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
    • The downside of this is when you try to track the car, as soon as you hit ABS you get introduced to a unbled system. I want to avoid this. I do not want to bleed/flush/jack up the car twice just to bleed the f**kin car.
×
×
  • Create New...