Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The new HPI is out?!?!?! It doesn't have my car in it does it? I got told it should be this issue :banana:

no your car is not there just a white 34 and a sickkkkkkk 33

the offset is 22 on all rims, my guards are liped at the back and pumped 5 mm front are stock

check out sydneyguardrolling.com, or even peter from bodyform.

gtr guards at the fronts should fix up the fronts with 18x10 +22

what size tyres you planning on running on the rims?

245 45 front and back

that should be alright, imo i'd go with a 40profile.

havent thought of a flare job instead of pumping?

i was told that 40 would be to hard to fit and then all i heard after that was blar blar blar blar.......

i was also told the rims will not fit but i also heard blar blar blar,.....

ive got 235/40/18 on my 18x10 +18, so 245/40 is possible.

rim's will fit with some work (20mm flare or pump of rear guards and gtr guards or 25mm aftermakret fibreglass guards.) just depends on your budget.

^ get 235/40 for the front and it should clear, if not lip the front guard & put abit of -ve camber in.

ur car looks like standard height, once you get coilovers or lowered springs/shocks in, it will camber in itself.

see how you go when you lower it, if still scrub then either get 235 tyre and/or roll the guards

Edited by dori32

Hey mate it is my car that is on the cover. I cut all the guards myself and rewelded them and got andy at complete smash in kirrawee to finish them of. He is probley the best at it and if your looking at getting the job done right take it to him

Also gtr front guards wont help you will have to change lights bumper bonnet to fit them and its not cheep

yer gtr guards are not for me pumped gts t are.lol

i spoke to andy about it all ready what did you pay if you don't mined me asking pm me if you want.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, you're wrong, and you've always been wrong about this. The Nismo has 2 sets of openings. One is a real 2-way, and the other is a 1-way. There is no 1.5-way possible with the ramps that they offer. A real 1.5-way does exist. That Cusco stuff I posted is a prime example. If the forward drive ramps are, say 55°, and the overrun ramps are, say, 30°, then you will get about half as much LSD effect on overrun than you do on drive. It is real, it realy works. OK, you're slightly right. The Nismo has 55° and 45° ramps on the 2-way, so it does offer less LSD effect on overrun. But, I think that just means that they've (probably) sensibly established that you do not want actually equal LSD effect on overrun. You just want "quite a lot, but not quite as much as the drive LSD effect".
    • Just wanted to unearth this and post my baby with the new front ❤️😝 Took her to my wedding rehearsal today. Next up is getting wide skirts (after wedding)
    • Yea, that is what I was getting at in my ramblings too. The nismo one actually is a 1.5 way and a 1 way. They don't do a *2* way because a true *2* way would have equal ramp angles. Or is that a true 1.5 way? Realistically I think a "1.5 way" does not actually exist. A diff can either lock in two directions or one. It also doesn't help that a LOT of people in Australia speak about 1.5 way diffs are referring to their 1 way diff.
    • Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
×
×
  • Create New...