Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

Guys I've had a closer look at the neo head now and I've gone with the external oil feed solution. I was about to try drilling through from the oil gallery for the lifter but decided against it because I reckon that the VCT will be calibrated for operation on nominal pump pressure from the block. I'm just not 100% sure that there won't be some pressure loss down that gallery feeding the lifters with all the points of loss at each lifter and don't want the VCT doing strange things.

I just think there must be a reason that the nissan engineers decided to run a standalone oil supply to this rather than using the existing head supply.

  • Like 1

It's not that surprising at all since it's a pressure actuated mechanism. The oil supply to the lifters is seriously restricted already (see oil control stuff) then is opened out into a ~15mm gallery that feeds oil to all the lifters. It may work OK on the R33 on/off VCT but I reckon it's unlikely to work perfectly on the Neo head with the variable degrees of advance/retard.

It's not that surprising at all since it's a pressure actuated mechanism. The oil supply to the lifters is seriously restricted already (see oil control stuff) then is opened out into a ~15mm gallery that feeds oil to all the lifters. It may work OK on the R33 on/off VCT but I reckon it's unlikely to work perfectly on the Neo head with the variable degrees of advance/retard.

The neo vct is either on or off, no variable.

The neo vct is either on or off, no variable.

I see...so what is the function of the oil? I'm not game to pull the gear apart in case it's full of complex little bits? I assume it's always in the nominal position for high revs and in the low revs is releases oil to the mechanism that rotates the gear relative to the camshaft. If you didn't have an oil mains pressure supply could it half actuate or not actuate at all?

the solenoid actually stops the oil AFTER the gear. What this does is pressurises it and pushes it / makes it rotate inside.

Thanks my understanding anyway.

When the solenoid opens, it releases the pressure and a spring returns the cam to the normal position.

Please correct me if I am wrong.

It indeed does need pressure.

the solenoid actually stops the oil AFTER the gear. What this does is pressurises it and pushes it / makes it rotate inside.

Thanks my understanding anyway.

When the solenoid opens, it releases the pressure and a spring returns the cam to the normal position.

Please correct me if I am wrong.

It indeed does need pressure.

Pretty sure this is wrong. The oil supply quite clearly comes up through the head from the block, passed the solenoid (depending on its state) then to the cam.

33 and 34 vct activation is different.

On 33 heads, the oil constantly feeds the front journal to lubricate it. The oil leaves the journal via the vct solenoid into the head. When the vct engages the solenoid blocks the drain which pressurises the pulley and advances the cam. The semi constant oil drain from the front journal is the reason for the oil drain in the front of the 33 vct heads.

If you look at the head and the cam you can see the oil holes are in line and it lines up with the groove in the cam which is ported to the cam pulley

On the 34 neo head, the front journal lubrication comes from the same main gallery as the rest of the cam bearings.

The vvt solenoid has its own feed which is closed when the vvt is off. when it turns on, it feeds pressure to the grove in the cam which activates the vvt pulley. When it turns off, it shuts the oil feed from the block, and vents the oil pressure in the pulley to the head.

If you look at the front cam journal you will see the same 2 holes as the 33 head, except they are not in line, and the grove in the neo cam lines up with the oil hole from the solenoid only.

The advantages of the 34 system are the cam journal is always fed with pressurised oil like the rest of the journals, and the vvt only discharges a small amount of oil into the head when the vvt switches off, instead of the constant loss of the 33 system.

This also explains why a few people here and there who just block off the vvt on their 33 head and run an rb20det or similar cam, seize the cam as there is no dedicated lubrication to the front journal.

sorry no photos on hand to show what i mean, and couldnt find them on google

  • Like 2

Good call, I've ended up with the head that the internal mod was done on (mustn't of been used until I got it). But it didn't work, seems like not enough pressure to engage the vct, so I just got rid of it completely

I've been thinking a little more about this; how would you know that it wasn't working? Your ecu could be actuating the solenoid but if your oil pressure is insufficient to actuate the cam then I don't know how you'd know? Unless you had previous seat of the pants experience with the motor or another car with similar specs to compare against? It's not like a light comes on in the dash when camshaft is advanced?

Because I did numerous tests on the solenoid, also hooked it up so it would come on with a switch to test at idle, note of engine didn't change at all. Did numerous dyno runs with it on/off and different rpm switch points, no difference.

even pulled the bolt that lets the oil through to vct gear out and replaced with a Solid bolt still no difference.

I don't think it was working.

Could be wrong

Because I did numerous tests on the solenoid, also hooked it up so it would come on with a switch to test at idle, note of engine didn't change at all. Did numerous dyno runs with it on/off and different rpm switch points, no difference.

even pulled the bolt that lets the oil through to vct gear out and replaced with a Solid bolt still no difference.

I don't think it was working.

Could be wrong

Must of been another issue. I have done the internal mod and been working fine for 1 year. Full vct function through boost street
  • 5 months later...

hey guys sorry to bring this back up but as im building one i thought i might ask ive attached a picture with my head and was looking at the core plug #1 and was wondering on the other side of it if i was to drill it to provide oil to vct off the main bucket gallery's

also i couldnt work out how to add the pix sorry

Edited by devilsknife
  • 5 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...