Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

Guys I've had a closer look at the neo head now and I've gone with the external oil feed solution. I was about to try drilling through from the oil gallery for the lifter but decided against it because I reckon that the VCT will be calibrated for operation on nominal pump pressure from the block. I'm just not 100% sure that there won't be some pressure loss down that gallery feeding the lifters with all the points of loss at each lifter and don't want the VCT doing strange things.

I just think there must be a reason that the nissan engineers decided to run a standalone oil supply to this rather than using the existing head supply.

  • Like 1

It's not that surprising at all since it's a pressure actuated mechanism. The oil supply to the lifters is seriously restricted already (see oil control stuff) then is opened out into a ~15mm gallery that feeds oil to all the lifters. It may work OK on the R33 on/off VCT but I reckon it's unlikely to work perfectly on the Neo head with the variable degrees of advance/retard.

It's not that surprising at all since it's a pressure actuated mechanism. The oil supply to the lifters is seriously restricted already (see oil control stuff) then is opened out into a ~15mm gallery that feeds oil to all the lifters. It may work OK on the R33 on/off VCT but I reckon it's unlikely to work perfectly on the Neo head with the variable degrees of advance/retard.

The neo vct is either on or off, no variable.

The neo vct is either on or off, no variable.

I see...so what is the function of the oil? I'm not game to pull the gear apart in case it's full of complex little bits? I assume it's always in the nominal position for high revs and in the low revs is releases oil to the mechanism that rotates the gear relative to the camshaft. If you didn't have an oil mains pressure supply could it half actuate or not actuate at all?

the solenoid actually stops the oil AFTER the gear. What this does is pressurises it and pushes it / makes it rotate inside.

Thanks my understanding anyway.

When the solenoid opens, it releases the pressure and a spring returns the cam to the normal position.

Please correct me if I am wrong.

It indeed does need pressure.

the solenoid actually stops the oil AFTER the gear. What this does is pressurises it and pushes it / makes it rotate inside.

Thanks my understanding anyway.

When the solenoid opens, it releases the pressure and a spring returns the cam to the normal position.

Please correct me if I am wrong.

It indeed does need pressure.

Pretty sure this is wrong. The oil supply quite clearly comes up through the head from the block, passed the solenoid (depending on its state) then to the cam.

33 and 34 vct activation is different.

On 33 heads, the oil constantly feeds the front journal to lubricate it. The oil leaves the journal via the vct solenoid into the head. When the vct engages the solenoid blocks the drain which pressurises the pulley and advances the cam. The semi constant oil drain from the front journal is the reason for the oil drain in the front of the 33 vct heads.

If you look at the head and the cam you can see the oil holes are in line and it lines up with the groove in the cam which is ported to the cam pulley

On the 34 neo head, the front journal lubrication comes from the same main gallery as the rest of the cam bearings.

The vvt solenoid has its own feed which is closed when the vvt is off. when it turns on, it feeds pressure to the grove in the cam which activates the vvt pulley. When it turns off, it shuts the oil feed from the block, and vents the oil pressure in the pulley to the head.

If you look at the front cam journal you will see the same 2 holes as the 33 head, except they are not in line, and the grove in the neo cam lines up with the oil hole from the solenoid only.

The advantages of the 34 system are the cam journal is always fed with pressurised oil like the rest of the journals, and the vvt only discharges a small amount of oil into the head when the vvt switches off, instead of the constant loss of the 33 system.

This also explains why a few people here and there who just block off the vvt on their 33 head and run an rb20det or similar cam, seize the cam as there is no dedicated lubrication to the front journal.

sorry no photos on hand to show what i mean, and couldnt find them on google

  • Like 2

Good call, I've ended up with the head that the internal mod was done on (mustn't of been used until I got it). But it didn't work, seems like not enough pressure to engage the vct, so I just got rid of it completely

I've been thinking a little more about this; how would you know that it wasn't working? Your ecu could be actuating the solenoid but if your oil pressure is insufficient to actuate the cam then I don't know how you'd know? Unless you had previous seat of the pants experience with the motor or another car with similar specs to compare against? It's not like a light comes on in the dash when camshaft is advanced?

Because I did numerous tests on the solenoid, also hooked it up so it would come on with a switch to test at idle, note of engine didn't change at all. Did numerous dyno runs with it on/off and different rpm switch points, no difference.

even pulled the bolt that lets the oil through to vct gear out and replaced with a Solid bolt still no difference.

I don't think it was working.

Could be wrong

Because I did numerous tests on the solenoid, also hooked it up so it would come on with a switch to test at idle, note of engine didn't change at all. Did numerous dyno runs with it on/off and different rpm switch points, no difference.

even pulled the bolt that lets the oil through to vct gear out and replaced with a Solid bolt still no difference.

I don't think it was working.

Could be wrong

Must of been another issue. I have done the internal mod and been working fine for 1 year. Full vct function through boost street
  • 5 months later...

hey guys sorry to bring this back up but as im building one i thought i might ask ive attached a picture with my head and was looking at the core plug #1 and was wondering on the other side of it if i was to drill it to provide oil to vct off the main bucket gallery's

also i couldnt work out how to add the pix sorry

Edited by devilsknife
  • 5 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Sounds like the rack seals blew.
    • ^ This is all good advice. I can imagine that there's some passive components in the HVAC controller that run that PWM output that could die, or suffer bad solder joints. It can be worth opening it up, taking a schmooze around looking for swollen electro caps, evidence of liquid escape anywhere, tracks that have been hot, lifted, cracked, etc. A DMM might not be suitable for seeing if the PWM output is pulsing. Might be too fast and too low voltage for a DMM to keep up. An analogue voltmeter might give a better hope. I use a handheld oscilloscope (<$100 from Aliexpress if you want something cheap). A DMM might see the voltage across the motor flicker. Otherwise, as above. If you can successfully see PWM action, then the control side should be good. If you can't see it with what you have, you might need to step up the instrumentation used, as above. Beyond that, and dbm7's advice on testing the motor directly, you're down to looking for broken wires, corroded connector pins, etc.
    • So Thanks for the comments etc. To follow up on this, we went down the path of fitting a divider down the middle of the external pipe that was added to the exhaust manifold and the divider went from very close to the external wastegate all the way up to the "V" part where the pipes from each side of the manifold joined. After this modification it was finally in a position to do the dyno-tune with some degree of success. Top end power was down about 10kw (250rwkw down to 240rwkw) I believe from previous but it seems to be more responsive lower down and at least it is now driveable and fun and back on the road to be enjoyed. Apparently the timing couldn't be run the same as it was running into knock and boost was down about 1psi. For all we know this could have been from the fuel being a bit older, or perhaps some slight complication from the new head gasket as we didn't have compression figures from before that mod to compare. I'm no mechanic and this is second hand info but I just wanted to follow-up to those that commented or read the original post with interest. After so many months of stuffing around this is a big win. The interesting part was most of the info around this was gained from information around Barra motors and not GTR as the manifold setup on the Barra with single turbo was more similar.  Thanks for those that helped with info. Regards Rob 
    • G'day ... first up, I very much doubt that's a resistor network (as used also for this job), but the part# looks right. The description of 'power module assembly' looks to be nissanese for 'PWM driven, ground switched, DC motor speed controller'.... the circuit in the schematic kinda infers that's the case... ...with the transistor symbol appearing in the unit described here as 'Fan Control Amp(lifier)'....being driven by pin20 on the HVAC unit,  and a feedback signal on pin19 from the motor negative terminal for some reason (might be motor fault detection, maybe they detect commutator switching to determine motor revs as well, I dunno)... but if they are  counting commutator spikes, a bad segment (or really worn brushes) will throw a spanner in the works... The motor itself will as said be brushed DC with segmented commutator, rated at 12VDC nominally ~ now-a-days I just unplug them, determine the positive wire, and hook them up to a variable power supply and find out how much current they draw, if they work etc etc ...you can also check for bad segments...ie; set the power supply up to feed 1volt @ 2amp max, then watch the wattage count as you slowly rotate the fan blower motor through a complete revolution ; any bad/dead segments will be clearly evident...some folks would just say determine the positive wire, and feed it battery voltage, and if fan spin, you've got a win...<grin>... well, at least that infers it should do something when plugged back in, and the HVAC unit commands it to run... and if it doesn't, you suspect the module, but you should check the PWM signal on pin20 is actually present, and if it is, blame the module ...  
    • Ah. OK. I take it back. I hadn't looked closely at the R33/4 arms and presumed that GKTech did as GKTech do everywhere else, which is to use sphericals there. The poly bushings are made to be 100% interchangeable, should use the standard bolt just fine. Every other bush in every other place in pretty much every other car, does.
×
×
  • Create New...