Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well out of 3x 32's that I personally know over here all making the same power (my RB30 making an early 250rwhp, and two mates with RB20's sporting 25 turbos and all the usually bolt on stuff.. one untuned the other a de+t tuned), we've all run 102/103mph.

yeh thats around what you would expect for the mods listed. 100mph on the stock computer boost and turbo like the others are running is going well!

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

these things are about as accurate as counting. i have seen another app using teh built in gps and tested on 2 phones at the same time in the same car. readings were over 1 second apart.

Yeh I can't really vouch for the accuracy seeing as ive never tested it against a real timed run. But I chose this app over about five similar ones due to several tests and reviews by different motoring blogs and others saying it's quite close to true. Within 0.1 on a 1/4 and +- 5% in power. And it does read consistent times I had three in a row. 14.62, 14.46, 14.42. Then changed launch style and got 14.01

Maybe their track is just a bit longer than a 1/4 mile :D

eheh, no it's a very good track, NHRA approved here in Canada.

Went with my friend who also have an R32 with same bolt-on as me and he managed a 98mph .. guess I'm a good driver :) Still need to take these 60ft down. I did 97mph when my clutch started to slip on me.

Some of the discrepancies btn your GPS system and the track may be due to the rollout at the track.

Couple of years ago Motor magazine tested a Porche at the quarter and had their VBox (GPS based testing system) strapped in the car as well. The result was that the VBox showed a slower time by around a 10th than the track timer - which was put down to the rollout. The car was already doing around 8klm an hour before the timing beams were triggered at the track compared to their VBox which starts timing from the time the car starts moving.

Yeh I can't really vouch for the accuracy seeing as ive never tested it against a real timed run. But I chose this app over about five similar ones due to several tests and reviews by different motoring blogs and others saying it's quite close to true. Within 0.1 on a 1/4 and +- 5% in power. And it does read consistent times I had three in a row. 14.62, 14.46, 14.42. Then changed launch style and got 14.01

Hopefully the time is correct, but 160rwkw from a cooled and zorsted RB20 is an all mighty ask. I definitely wouldnt think the power is accurate at all imo.

If its true, im selling up, because thats what my nearly standard neo makes! :)

Yeh I thought that was high. But I've already had a few surprises from this car so I'm thinking it's possibly got a chipped / tuned ECU

Also brass button clutch may be helping my MPH

I still don't believe this whole 2-3psi extra crap with a full exhaust. I have to dial in 25% duty increase into the ebc to get 12psi (with a 10psi actuator) and I've got as free flowing exhaust as possible.

Im skeptical of producing fly wheel kilowatts are the rear wheels with only a zorst and a cooler. But all dynos are different, the mph is where its backed up. And a 160rwkw 32 should def be passing 100mph like most are saying theirs are :)

Hmmm zorst and cooler and 206rwkw, now that sounds nice:D

I still don't believe this whole 2-3psi extra crap with a full exhaust. I have to dial in 25% duty increase into the ebc to get 12psi (with a 10psi actuator) and I've got as free flowing exhaust as possible.

ive had dyno print out's done after every modification and at one case a before/after dyno run on the same day after installing an intercooler.

Both dyno runs were done on the same day, seperated by a couple of hours. Full exhaust, stock ecu, standard actuator etc

As you can see it jumps up to 13psi where it drops down afterwards

1574kwmh7.th.jpg

Im skeptical of producing fly wheel kilowatts are the rear wheels with only a zorst and a cooler. But all dynos are different, the mph is where its backed up. And a 160rwkw 32 should def be passing 100mph like most are saying theirs are :D

Hmmm zorst and cooler and 206rwkw, now that sounds nice:D

How is it any different from r33's doing 180kw on nothing more on exhaust and fmic? After all, thats what they produce flywheel too :)

Please do some reading up in both rb20/rb25 turbo upgrade threads to get a better idea

well I have a peak boost of 0.85 BAR which I think is 12.3 PSI ? Stock boost in rb20 is 12 psi. So no huge increase for me. Will have to attend next whoop as Wednesday and see how I go.

Edit: boost reading is from my defi guage. ... Not my iPhone :)

well I have a peak boost of 0.85 BAR which I think is 12.3 PSI ? Stock boost in rb20 is 12 psi. So no huge increase for me. Will have to attend next whoop as Wednesday and see how I go.

stock boost in a rb20 is 10psi due to the 10psi actuator on the standard turbo.

Hence why r33 owners put rb20 actuators on their rb25 turbo's to get 10psi :)

How is it any different from r33's doing 180kw on nothing more on exhaust and fmic? After all, thats what they produce flywheel too :D

Please do some reading up in both rb20/rb25 turbo upgrade threads to get a better idea

Yeh its definitely not any different, and I dont believe many R33's would be making 180rwkw on just a cooler and zorst either lol.

Considering they put out 130-140rwkw stocko, throwing a zorst and cooler on for an extra 40rwkw is a pretty good gain!

In the end all figures are useless anyway. MPH is the true test, so lets hope the thread starter gets the 32 to the track and can get some good mph

Im a jealous 25 owner here, I cant handle figures so easily near mine ok :) jks

Edited by Granthem
ive had dyno print out's done after every modification and at one case a before/after dyno run on the same day after installing an intercooler.

Both dyno runs were done on the same day, seperated by a couple of hours. Full exhaust, stock ecu, standard actuator etc

As you can see it jumps up to 13psi where it drops down afterwards

1574kwmh7.th.jpg

All that sheet shows is that your setup spikes.. if it was running 13psi I would expect to see 13psi solid, not tapering back to ACTUATOR PRESSURE..

Here are my shitty boost curves from the old RB20 and the current RB30 (I have since smoothed out the intial spike and that little hump).

RB20_dyno.jpg

RB30_dyno.jpg

One instance does not a generalisation make..

All that sheet shows is that your setup spikes.. if it was running 13psi I would expect to see 13psi solid, not tapering back to ACTUATOR PRESSURE..

Here are my shitty boost curves from the old RB20 and the current RB30 (I have since smoothed out the intial spike and that little hump).

One instance does not a generalisation make..

my sheet shows that due to the exhaust and fmic, the boost is larger than the factory 10psi.

You can see that the whole run (the blue line) stays above 10psi right till the end. So regardless if its not holding a solid 13psi, its still pushing more than 10psi throughout the whole run.

Mate, I'm runnin in my R32 Gtst 14psi, dyno'd at 165.6rwkw/457Nm @ 6500rpm tuned on a 28deg day by Dr Drift and only managed a 14.452 at 98.7mph.

I have a full 3" turbo back, hi flow cat, intercooler, pod, bigger fuel pump & boost controller for the life of me couldn't break the 100mph mark no matter how many times I tried(did 15 runs)

My best re-action time was .440.

There's a big difference of what a 20yr old car can do compared to a fresh outa the factory car sprouting figures on paper is meant to do.

Mine before remapping was puttin out 116rwkw with all the mods I have listed and was running lean as up top before remap.

The only way you will know is to get it on the strip & see for yourself- if your up in Qld your welcome to come to our next Drag day & see how you go-we would love to see you there-Qld Events team out :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...