Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I've chipped my R32 RB20DET and it got rid of the rev limiter. So I got a bee*r powerbuilder (spark cut) and am trying to use that instead.

It's a nice unit and works as described, but even on the least 'loud' setting - ie position 1 on the dial, it makes a hell of a bang from the exhaust... Which I'm guessing isn't very nice to the engine / turbo / cat / whatever else.

Is there something wrong? Does anyone else have one and it's the same? I'm sure not putting the setting up any further!

I'm not sure whether they are just like this, or whether the chipped ECU confuses it etc, so any help / info would really be appreciated.

Thanks in advance for any replies ;)

Bobby.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/253537-beer-rev-limit-very-rough/
Share on other sites

Thats what they do.. and they wont do your exhaust wheel any favours either lol..

Yeah I have heard bad things about these, but can't talk from experience. May be a whole lot of hearsay for all I know..

they say its safer because its still putting fuel into the cylinder so its not like detonation, its also why it goes bang because of the fuel getting ignited, i love these things

Well how about we are telling you that it isnt?

Ceramic wheels & heat are the two worst enemies of stock skyline turbos.

Dumping in the extra fuel, makes "the bang" and this is raising the temps which will most certainly decrease the life of the turbo, cat and anything else in the way.

Plus with all the 'firing' going on, who knows what other damage is being done in the head with all that fuel buring when it shouldnt be.

Whilst the Nissan rev limiter isnt exactly friendly, the way people use the bee-r ones is even worse

Well how about we are telling you that it isnt?

Ceramic wheels & heat are the two worst enemies of stock skyline turbos.

Dumping in the extra fuel, makes "the bang" and this is raising the temps which will most certainly decrease the life of the turbo, cat and anything else in the way.

Plus with all the 'firing' going on, who knows what other damage is being done in the head with all that fuel buring when it shouldnt be.

Whilst the Nissan rev limiter isnt exactly friendly, the way people use the bee-r ones is even worse

fair enough, i cant remember where i read it but they were just saying about the fuel, and how its better then detonation, but yeah i never really thought about anything else which comes along with this type of limiter,

so to add to this, can i ask a list of limiters or a limiter which would be the safest? or there isnt really one in the long run?

Cheers

EDIT: this is where i read it,

This is Bee*R’s popular two-stage ignition cutting rev-limiter. It is used to prevent damage arising from over-revving your engine. Part of the reason for its popularity is the large flames and loud bangs it produces from the exhaust when active!

The way in which it works differs from the factory rev limiter in that it is an ignition cut, as opposed to a fuel cut. The reason for this is because if an engine (particularly turbocharged) regularly hits a fuel-cut rev limit (such as in high performance driving, or particularly drifting) engine damage can arise due to the lean condition produced when the original ECU shuts off the fuel pump. The BEE*R rev-limiter allows fuel to pass into the engine still, limiting engine speed by disabling the ignition signal. The Bee*R rev limiter is fully adjustable in 500rpm increments, for safety reasons allowing only a lower rev-limit to be configured than standard. If you have spent a lot of money tuning your engine, or are running at high RPM’s for extended periods of time, it could be recommended to run a lower rev-limit to prolong engine life. Both Formula 1 and JGTC cars use ignition cutting rev limiters, so it is a fully race proven concept.

The Bee*R can also be used as a “two stage rev limiter”, as an aid for launching your car. The Bee*R is configurable for two different rev-limits. A lower rev limit can be activated by a switch, the handbrake switch often being used. This configurable lower limit, can be set to the optimum RPM to launch your particular car from in 500rpm increments. When the handbrake is released, the usual rev limit comes into action, allowing quick launches, and full performance down the strip.

The Bee*R rev-limiter has another final neat feature. The gain control knob allows you to adjust the frequency of the ignition cut. This in turn changes the frequency and sound of the flames and bangs from your exhaust!

Available for use with all rotary, 4 and 6 cylinder engines.

Edited by sly32

Hey guys,

Thanks for the feedback.

I'm aware they are supposed to make all the noise, but if position 1 sounds like this then position 9 must blow the back half of the car off. I just thought it could be a bit tamer than this.

And, as I said, it's chipped and does not have a factory rev limit anymore, so I consider this a safer option than doing 9500rpm by accident!

Lol at the maccas / kebab shop.

Cheers,

Bobby.

please tell me how they kill oil pumps mate

my guess is that they dont like the massive vibrations caused by the chinese new year in your exhaust...

was told this by ben/racepace so i'm not willing to risk it

i love these limiters... but i like my engine more... its basically the same sorta thing as antilag but different.. haha. engines/turbos hate antilag

i would think that setting 1 would be loud as i think its the longest delay so more fuel would be pumped into it and a bigger bang. the higher the setting, the shorter the cut, the more frequent but less violent bangs.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I drive the Tiguan much harder than the Skyline in all conditions, because it just grips and hooks, unlike the R33 shit box
    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
×
×
  • Create New...