Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I had ACL bearings on my conrods and main bearings and it all shrank like an mm to 2mm from their actual size when

removed. Bearings can be taken off by just a slight touch instead of sliding them off with some force.

Practically the bearings were just floating.

What could be the cause of bearings shrinking?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/255632-rod-and-main-bearings-shrank/
Share on other sites

The actual cause is heat.

But yes, you are right, lack of oil pressure is the most likely cause for the bearing to be damaged, thus causing the heat when it's grinding away at the crank.

Who built the engine? Or do you not want to say?

I had ACL bearings on my conrods and main bearings and it all shrank like an mm to 2mm from their actual size when

removed. Bearings can be taken off by just a slight touch instead of sliding them off with some force.

Practically the bearings were just floating.

What could be the cause of bearings shrinking?

basically heat related, the shells are actually made to sqeeze into the tunnel from new . this is called the bearing crush. the shells have lost their crush from a few reasons, 1. detonation

2 lack of oil or starvation

3 clearance problem ,, caused from assembly ,machining etc etc.

if you post up a pic of the bearing surface i can tell you which is the cause..

Is that through the white metal or is it just the light??? How many Km's, normally bearings with copper showing are big mileage and/or abuse or a failed oil pump/no oil in motor.

If its through the white metal, you have a serious oil supply issue.

Pics

definately oil starvation guys. normal thing that happens is the top end fills with oil cant get back to the sump quick enough. do you have restrictors? do you have a drain from rear of head or a catch can with a drain back to the sump? check oil pump is not broken? what type of oil used? oil cooler?

Sory, its the camera flash.

Bearings ran close 3k mileage.

No restrictors. Problem is, i dont have a catch can.

Oil pump was JUN. Bought new. HKS oil cooler and Motul oils.

This is just crap!

I just wanna find out the cause of it. Least i know whats the problem now..

Sory, its the camera flash.

Bearings ran close 3k mileage.

No restrictors. Problem is, i dont have a catch can.

Oil pump was JUN. Bought new. HKS oil cooler and Motul oils.

This is just crap!

I just wanna find out the cause of it. Least i know whats the problem now..

High volume oil pump could be the problem. The stock engine already has problems draining oil from the top end, and the high volume pump just shoves more up there and drains the sump more quickly than the stocker.... ouchy

I am not sure but i would say that you have had some very fine dirt / grit in your engine either from assembly or ingressed from a oil change.

I am no expert but with a lack of oil pressure you have metal on metal which causes heat and a dis coloring of the copper surface. From these pictures i cant see any real heat discoloring on the bearing. What i see is a good shiney finish which could be from fine particals slowly polishing your bearings away.

What leave me wondering is the marks i can see on the bearing, again hard to tell but they look like dents and there is only one way these can be put into the inside of a bearing shell

Ok first of all, the oil starvation is the most likely cause but it still doesn't tell you why it failed.

The oil pump/restrictor/head return is a crock of shit. Nissan don't have issues with any of that shit. Yes, improvements can be made to the system but at 3k on a fresh engine, it's still a crock of shit.

The ONLY time oil control is an issue is if it's an RB26 without sump modifications AND it's on a race track at the time of failure.

3k old engine, so it's likely to be only just finished the run in. The fault can be anything from abuse during run in, to incorrect assembly.

And I don't see how any of you other engine builders can pretend to know the cause while only looking at one single BE cap. The picture quality is too poor and it's only one cap.

It doesn't matter how many pictures this guy puts up, without inspecting every single piece of the puzzle in detail, you are all just guessing.

Ok first of all, the oil starvation is the most likely cause but it still doesn't tell you why it failed.

The oil pump/restrictor/head return is a crock of shit. Nissan don't have issues with any of that shit. Yes, improvements can be made to the system but at 3k on a fresh engine, it's still a crock of shit.

The ONLY time oil control is an issue is if it's an RB26 without sump modifications AND it's on a race track at the time of failure.

3k old engine, so it's likely to be only just finished the run in. The fault can be anything from abuse during run in, to incorrect assembly.

And I don't see how any of you other engine builders can pretend to know the cause while only looking at one single BE cap. The picture quality is too poor and it's only one cap.

It doesn't matter how many pictures this guy puts up, without inspecting every single piece of the puzzle in detail, you are all just guessing.

hear hear...

Good post Dan, this is precisely why i dont post in these type of threads. Without knowing in extensive detail about every factor its just that a guessing game and doesn't help the OP. Take it to an engineer and get a full report with every engine part inspected. The oil control opinion you also have is something i firmly agree with, we are definately on the same page Dan.

Its like those "my cars running rough threads" when everything from AFM's, coil packs, to tail light bulb blown is mentioned.

Thanks for your input guys.

Will have all the bearings remove tomorrow and will take the crank for balancing. Will have the pics up by tomorrow.

Could it be the crank was moved or bent?

Anyway my specs are below.

Im using a RB26 crank (I think it was from a R34 cos the JUN oil pump fits without any collar issue) with a RB25 block

Wiseco RB26 pistons

GTR Rods

ACL Bearings

JUN Oil pump

HKS Oil cooler

RB25 cyl. head

Ran a good 388whp on dyno and few more runs on street before i felt this oil pressure problem.

Anyway, does a quad plate clutch have anything to do with the oil pressure problem?

I just want to know how and why the bearings failed.

Hope this thread will help others to gain experience and hope it wont happen to anyone of us here again.

Cheers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Kapr Haha yeah thats the one. I missed that you had a built up engine, I wouldn't want to run it on there either then. It was good in my situation just to replace the original turbo on a stock engine. @MBS206Yep definitely not a replacement for anything name brand
    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
×
×
  • Create New...