Jump to content
SAU Community

Blac...phillip Island Day Trip Wrap Up!


Recommended Posts

Not blanking out anyone's number plates or faces (if any) because nobody was hooning around so there is no need to hide anything, in my opinion.

If you or your car is in a picture and want it removed/blurred then let me know in a PM and I'll do what needs to be done.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/rh1n0/sets/72157613468218885/

I was the passenger with the DSLR in the white R34 GT-T, just in case you're wondering.

'twas a good day. T51R gave me audible pleasure. I wonder if he saw my thumbs up as he gave it a little past me on the way home?

I got stuck on the South Gippy for a little while where the bushfire had gone over the road in Lynbrook, quite creepy.

A few pics soon (nothing special.)

Haha yea i think my brothers car would have won loudest car there... no rear muffler would do it, full straight through lol

silver 34 4door ?

that DEALME car i saw later in Cranbourne around 530pm outside a pizza shop i think

Although unfortunate about the bush fires etc and not going on the original cruise, plan B cruise was fine :D

lots of nice cars had a ball, still shattered about washing my car this morning only to leave the car wash and for it to rain :rant:>_<

Some pics @ http://s241.photobucket.com/albums/ff253/J...%20Spur%202009/

clean your car ash :rant:

I did the day before, and then the wind/rain came and ruined the party :D

So i cbf'd doing it again!

Was a top day even though the spur was totally outta action.

I think my car cutout maybe 25 times, so not too bad LOL! new wiring loom on order >_<

yep pity about the spur being a no go... we have close family friends in Kinglake but luckily they were in Lorne at the time... still waiting to hear if they lost their house

heading to the meet point Sun morning I had no idea about the fires... spent all Sat moving into new place and hadn't hooked the tv up yet

cruise was good for making it up as you go and a bit of a downpour etc... at least in the rain I was able to test out the 4wd... it works:)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...