Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

But they are race spec brakes- 380mm two-piece rotors front and rear with 6 piston front and 4 piston rear monobloc calipers. The same sort of thing they have on V8 Taxicars. It's just the pad composition and extra 400kgs that make life hard for the GT-R at a track like Bathurst. I think a pad with a much less street friendly heat range (say 300-1000 degrees) would help things a lot (and more extreme cooling ducting for the centre of the discs).

http://domstat.wordpress.com/2008/08/06/th...tr-brakes-post/

Have a squiz (posted up prev page by scathing), its a good read.

Yeah but unlike the GTR, the HSV427's performance and build quality does not justify its price.

sit in a base porsche 911 and a base GTR and tell me which has a better quality interior.

sit in a base porsche 911 and a base GTR and tell me which has a better quality interior.

And out of the base 911 and the GTR, which has the better engine, better transmission, better usage of power, better dynamics and faster in a straight line and on the track? Which one costs less? Does a few extra pieces of cow hide in the Porsche justify its price against the GTR?

sit in a base porsche 911 and a base GTR and tell me which has a better quality interior.

You should actually try that, I know I have, and the answer isnt clear cut at all....but this is the internet.

Even better is the Hyundai Excel early model style notchy vague cable gearshift in the 911. A work of art indeed :)

The guy who wrote the article reckons that at around AU$148K, it's a bit too expensive - cos it's a Nissan. Talk about brand snobbery. Where else can you find a car in Australia with that kind of performance for that kind of price? The author is a retard.

...the irony is they go weak at the knees over cheap and nasty tupperware Commodores & Falcodores!.........

........and what's more the GT-R is actually built and engineered to near as to makes no difference Porsche levels. Don't get me wrong, a Boxster S with a couple of options is a lovely car, but doesn't stand out as a superior car to a similarly priced GT-R, the fact that they don't recognize this, show us what red necks they are.

.......As for the badge, it's the GT-R badge holds iconic status. another example is Chevrolet Corvette...the Corvette badge overshadows the fact that it's Chev, although the one difference is at least the GT-R has a ripper of an interior made of quality materials unlike the vette which has a daewoo Epica style/quality dash!

...the irony is they go weak at the knees over cheap and nasty tupperware Commodores & Falcodores!.........

........and what's more the GT-R is actually built and engineered to near as to makes no difference Porsche levels. Don't get me wrong, a Boxster S with a couple of options is a lovely car, but doesn't stand out as a superior car to a similarly priced GT-R, the fact that they don't recognize this, show us what red necks they are.

.......As for the badge, it's the GT-R badge holds iconic status. another example is Chevrolet Corvette...the Corvette badge overshadows the fact that it's Chev, although the one difference is at least the GT-R has a ripper of an interior made of quality materials unlike the vette which has a daewoo Epica style/quality dash!

I agree 100% with that. However I don't think they're retards at all. I believe they get good dollars for what they write up about and I assume Nissan didn't pay anything as car speaks for itself!

It's always about the money!

Dave

Which one costs less? Does a few extra pieces of cow hide in the Porsche justify its price against the GTR?

Don't make an assumption that the 911 has a more luxurious or sumptious interior than a GT-R. What many people do not realise is that option list for interior trim fittings for all Porsches goes for at least 10 pages. The GT-R actually has leather trimmed dash as standard and if anything probaby comes with more standard 'cowhide' than a 911!.

Whenever you see a 911 with beautiful monocolour leather dash, steering wheel and seats, it's most likely a $5,000 option box has been ticked, then there are painted interior surfaces, leather sunvisors (around $1300 worth!). No, a standard Boxster, Cayman or 911 interior, whilst robust and high quality is fairly austere. The scope for factory customization for a 911 is vast...but remember it comes at a cost. It's quite easy to option up a Boxster or Cayman well past the asking price of the GT-R Premium ($152,800) and if you talk to owners many spend that kind of money too. A 3.6 911 is $219K + options and a Turbo is $360k + Options.

I know of at least one GT-R buyer awaiting delivery in April who originally cancelled a new 911 order. He's never bought a Nissan and let me tell you after spending time in 911's and Mercs he was in no way shape or form dsiappointed with the look, feel and presence of the GT-R!!!

I read the March Motor mag today at work. Even though on Mount Panorama it was almost 20-30 seconds slower then the modern V8 Super cars, those cars have been tuned and tested and tune and retuned and pulled apart and put back together and tune again for each any every race they go into. The amount on money and time spend of prepping the V8 supercars for a race in terms of man power is probably just as much as the race itself. The R35 GTR hasnt really been out that long, but already alot of power upgrade are on the way. Give the tuners their time and testing, and we will see the lap times slowly get lower. Also from what I also read in that mag, the next Bathurst 1000 will have a R35 as the pace car XD

The way I see it, as soon as the tuning shops start pulling apart the block itself (they might already be doing that) we will see the real hidden potential of the R35...well atleast I hope.

I hate to break it to you Helious, a V8 Supercar isnt the same as a Commodore you see on the street with a bit of tuning. Its a million dollar purpose built race car that these days is lucky to share one or two parts with the road car. An R35GTR on the other hand is an ADR compliant genuine road car....or at least ours is :ermm:

I hope and pray people dont start pulling these cars apart, putting shit mods all over them and destroying them...thankfully those that would do such things are probably seven to ten years away from funding ownership....as happened with the R32 GTR, took around till 2000 for some to ruin them with crappy dumb mods when they were released in 1991. No need to panic yet then :rolleyes:

I agree with you Martin, the V8 super cars are purpose built. But that is what make the R35 so amazing aswell, as it is ONLY less then a minute off the V8 super car laps, and its a street car. I can also imagine Nissan when designing the R35GTR also had durability in mind, as well as performance (no point having a car that keeps breaking its everything when its under warrenty).

If someone wants to go down the same road they did when they brought the R32GTR into bathurst, and Im also hoping they spare no expense and dont cut corners when it comes to any modifications they make, we can only wait and see. I dont mean to cause any arguments, all I'm saying that people will try to see how much power they can get out of the R35GTR. But seeing the performance figures for it factory, one would say Nissan knew what they were doing.

sit in a base porsche 911 and a base GTR and tell me which has a better quality interior.

I've driven 997 Carreras and sat in an R35: GT-R craps all over Porsche for interior feel and modernity of design

I read the March Motor mag today at work. Even though on Mount Panorama it was almost 20-30 seconds slower then the modern V8 Super cars....

Heloius, maybe I missed something, but I thought I read the GT-R set a 2.25min lap time around MT Panorama and the V8 Supercar LAP RECORD is 2.07min, that's only 18 secs difference, to a Bone stock road car. One can only wonder what a Spec V can achieve.

I must actually buy this copy (I will today- I only had a quick read at the newsagents!), but what I want to know was this GT-R the 'Series II' 2009MY they tested?..that would be the car with 4 more kW and a number of suspension upgrades, the car that was noticeably quicker then the 'series 1' 2008MY GT-R when tested by Best Motoring last month?...or was it a 'series 1' 2008MY Grey import?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...