Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Haha nice one.

Still, knocking can be avoided in any case...

This situation is so typical, backyard mechanics install their awesome stuff and take the car to the tuner where they find everything is wrong, then blame the tuner.

Save yourselves the hassles, take it to someone who knows what they are doing.

P.S the only way you can machine the face the manifold seals on is to remove the head! You shouldnt need to do that unless youve dug holes with a die grinder or similar cleaning the old gasket off or something stupid like that. But still wouldnt surprise me..

well, i mean it still can be a bad tuner cant it? why would any tuner tune a car that isnt up to scratch for tuning, and then also, why would he blame the cams? it doesnt make sense, you would think a tuner that was switch on would say, nar couldnt tune it because of this exhaust leak blah blah blah,

also the fact that a disco potato made 310hp (230kw) on 11psi is sus, i dont think its even possible,

so then again, its not down to poor fitment of parts,

I'm no tuner but... Looking at the boost curve I can say its not the tuner thats the problem.

Take the manifold to any engineering shop and get them to face the manifold if its leaking as much as you say its probly out by 1 - 2mm from being welded and not bolted down uring the process.

What brand is the manifold? Cracking on the weld is common for non-name stuff. It looks very thin... So are you going to replace it or try to get it welded up and hope it hangs together? The mounting face looks thick so it probably true, but check it anyway.

Re: the tuner going ahead and tuning something like that, yeah i have to agree with you guys now. He should have aborted the tune and called. Take it somewhere else next time.

putting stock manifold on i believe? it looked like a proper mani but guess not hey, the tuner still charged him the 600, so im guessing it was on there for the full time, you could hear the leak very easy when bonnet was open, also from what i was told (which gfunk can comfirm) he said i could only tune it for 11psi, and not 16psi because of it pinging, you have a exhaust leak aswell,

so yeah this does mean a bad tuner, specially when he blames the cams for the problems?

dodgey backyard mechanics, can hardly blame that for problems, no dogey stuff goes on here

so, when the car gets the manifold put on, and enough money saved for another tune, i think hes taking it to matt at pits to tune.,

i guess then we will find out what the program is like

(Gfunk is the one that spoke to the tuner on the phone, my other mate is the 1 that owns the car, reason gfunk spoke to the tuner was because our other mate doesnt know to much about cars,)

Edited by sly32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...