Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just to annoy you Bris - here's the footage on how easy it is to run a 1.50.1 in a GT-R :nyaanyaa:

http://www.viddler.com/explore/Snowmann/videos/2/

Thats why i couldnt enjoy a GTR, it all looks easier then it is, and there is way too little drama :(. I would rather pilot my thing....keeps you so much busier

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

heh yeah i'm with you bris....

thats probably one of the most boring vids i've eva seen....

its all about the excitment...

I'd much rather be excited doing my 2:04 than be bored doing a 1:50....

On that note.... Firman picked up a 2:04.55 in the 180B

my current best is a 2:04.97 :nyaanyaa:

keeping in mind that my car has 2.5 times the power of Firmans!!!

Seems I have some work to do....

Thats why i couldnt enjoy a GTR, it all looks easier then it is, and there is way too little drama . I would rather pilot my thing....keeps you so much busier

Lol 1:50 might be easy in a heavily modded GTR by RP but try it in a fairly std one and you won't be bored chasing a 1:49 :nyaanyaa:

speaking of the noise... that is a flawed system. if tim can get away with gate and scotsman gets pinged with la di da benno special super silent exhaust then somebody is smoking too much crack.

we stay less than 2k from the track and there is no way we would be able to hear the gtr more than tims or brisbys car.

I like the current system :nyaanyaa:

Strange that, but must just be the frequency it's at. I didn't have EPA issues at Sandown either with the open 'gate.

Sorry to hear Matt, hope the engine is all good.

It's not easy - its just smooth :thumbsup:

There's a difference. Sometimes backing off a bit and being smooth is actually faster. You should try it one day Bris :devil:

Ah, something about the grass being a different colour over other side of the fence...you needed to have driven my car when James and Juz drove it with the Bilsteins and old suspension. You often joke but i dont think you realised just how hard my car used to be to drive.

I can promise you that the vids of me driving it required me to be smooth and delicate with inputs, it may not look like it but i was. Well , i was driving it smoothly to the best of my ability. Just ask Juz how much she enjoyed drivng it with the Bilsteins?

It was so much better with the new suspension, and should be a lot better now i have most of the bushes etc replaced so no more slop.

You can see in the above vid,

It's not easy - its just smooth :thumbsup:

There's a difference. Sometimes backing off a bit and being smooth is actually faster. You should try it one day Bris :devil:

Ah, something about the grass being a different colour over other side of the fence...you needed to have driven my car when James and Juz drove it with the Bilsteins and old suspension. You often joke but i dont think you realised just how hard my car used to be to drive.

I can promise you that the vids of me driving it required me to be smooth and delicate with inputs, it may not look like it but i was. Well , i was driving it smoothly to the best of my ability. Just ask Juz how much she enjoyed drivng it with the Bilsteins?

It was so much better with the new suspension, and should be a lot better now i have most of the bushes etc replaced so no more slop.

You can see in the above vid, half the reason it looked all over the place is the fact that it used to pitch all over the place on its soft suspension at high speeds so slight throttle adjustment gave it pretty bad lift off oversteer. Anyway, you are winding me up....which is not a nice thing to do to a guy that is itching to get his car back on the track. :)

Had a really good day, First time at PI and it was great.

That track is just so far above anywhere else I have drivin.

Russman:

Slow time thanks to super cheap drift spec tires on the rear and ok streets on the front, cold track , rain , mass oil attack and first time there, Although it was good to have shit tires in a way as It helped me to find the smoothest line around which will be good for next time.

Frysy:

Harden up and get some gate! lol .

I honestly dont know how Scotsman got done and I didnt, I can understand in the morning sessions as I was pussy footing it around but in the arvo I thought I would get done for sure. luck of the draw I guess.

Bris , im keen for us to attack PI side by side im sure that will send the db meter into overload.

Very enjoyable day for me , feel sorry for the blokes who took bent cars home.

sandown 2 weeks . should be good.

Anyone got 2nd hand semis they wanna sell ??? 245-255 x 17 ??? LEt me know

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...