Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thats why its called 1KG actuator. Once boost controller removed it should stay around 10psi. You can also play with the actuator's pre-load to alter boost settings.

Thats why its called 1KG actuator. Once boost controller removed it should stay around 10psi. You can also play with the actuator's pre-load to alter boost settings.

Boost controller has been turned off. Which way do i adjust to lower boost? Not keen on 1Bar until injectors are sorted

Stao, what if any are the differences between your GT3076 with your .82 rear and the Garrett original version? I realise you use a different exhaust housing and that it's a direct fit, but does the turbo have any less potential due to the compressor housing?

Stao, what if any are the differences between your GT3076 with your .82 rear and the Garrett original version? I realise you use a different exhaust housing and that it's a direct fit, but does the turbo have any less potential due to the compressor housing?

+1 good question

Just direct vacuum straight into the actuator with no boost controller. You should see a drop in boost curve.

GT3076 is a Original Garrett Item. We use them in our turbo builts, high flows and overhauls depends on customers request. Most of our turbochargers are built in sleeve bearing setup which is some thing that is equivalent to produces similar end result.

Garrett does not have IW housings that made to suit RB25det OEM engine setup. Ours is a custom made housing which is in the same Air ratio but with OEM RB25det Bolton pattern.

stao would you be able to hiflow a 2IU to HKS GTRS or 2835 spec?

I would be interested to know if its possible also to do a hiflow with 3076 internals and a matching front housing size that would perform similarly as well... is it possible to modify the RB rear housing in a way that is as effective as the original garrett IW housing in this scenario? in a way that does not require cropping of the exhaust wheel and that does not have the exhaust wheel pertruding out the rear port of the turbo (therefore blocked by the housing)

it would be great if you could clear these up for me Stao, thanks

We can build a 2871 equivalent CHRA in a customized T3x .64 turbine housing with 6 bolt dump. Should make similar sort of power and response.

Garrett does not have IW housings that made to suit RB25det OEM engine setup. Ours is a custom made housing which is in the same Air ratio but with OEM RB25det Bolton pattern.

They actually do now: NEW!! RB Nissan Special Garrett GT3076R ball bearing turbo

Bottom of page 2:

http://horsepowerinabox.com/HPIAB2/category12_2.htm

Although, GCG do not like it and say that the standard skyline flange is too restrictive for the GT3076R and causes boost spiking etc.

This is from a Friend's 95 R33 running a ATR45 600HP turbo in .50 comp and .82 turbine internally gated using a high pressure actuator.

fully stock RB25det engine, 550cc injectors, cooler, Nistune chiped Z32 ECU , and 3inch turbo back exhaust. Tuned at 399rwHP @ 18psi.

It hits 18psi at 4800RPM. Not the most responsive turbo, But it certainly can do lot more then 300rwkws.

298rwkwrb25dets.jpg

This is from a Friend's 95 R33 running a ATR45 600HP turbo in .50 comp and .82 turbine internally gated using a high pressure actuator.

fully stock RB25det engine, 550cc injectors, cooler, Nistune chiped Z32 ECU , and 3inch turbo back exhaust. Tuned at 399rwHP @ 18psi.

It hits 18psi at 4800RPM. Not the most responsive turbo, But it certainly can do lot more then 300rwkws.

Hi,

Sorry, I know you've probably been asked this question too many times to count, but I read a few pages ago a quote from you saying something like "We can build you a turbo to hit 280rwkw with excelent street response" from an RB25. I'm very interested in this, could you detail exactly what this would entail man? I've been reading through the thread but everything seems to change so often I thought I'd just ask you to see what was current.

This sounds awesome man, I just want to work out if I need to, and where to get dump pipes, and if my tuner's happy tuning this (I see no reason why he wouldn't be =]).

Cheers,

Tim

Edit: Obviously all the supporting mod's will already be factors, I'm just interested as to the specs of the turbo. Oh, and a price, if it's ok to post it here?

Edited by That_timothy

What does the 0.82 housing look like? Is it similar to the standard nissan one? Or is it obvious its aftermarket?

Will the standard heat shield still fit on?

Edited by Harey

The ATR43G3 is a 3076 56T equivalent turbo. in .82 turbine full boost at 4300RPM. Good for about 280rwkw with highpressure actautor internally gated. We can install a GT3076BB 56T CHRA for $450 additional.

The .82 turbine housing is a custom made housing in T3x print, with a 6 bolt OEM RB25's dump pattern.

The ATR43G3 is a 3076 56T equivalent turbo. in .82 turbine full boost at 4300RPM. Good for about 280rwkw with highpressure actautor internally gated. We can install a GT3076BB 56T CHRA for $450 additional.

The .82 turbine housing is a custom made housing in T3x print, with a 6 bolt OEM RB25's dump pattern.

Is it possible to get the ATR43G3 with a .63 rear?

As I was looking at getting either a 3071 or 3076 with a .63 rear.

Yes that'd be 1250 + 150 for the ATR43G3 with .82 housing and the high pressure actuator. + 10% GST and $80 oil feeding line. which is $1600 AUD.

Same profile In .63 turbine can get full boost around 3500RPM. But you need a external gate to hold it steady.

Boost curve in .63 turbine:

http://www.digi-hardware.com/images/dynosh...3boost15psi.jpg

Same profile In .63 turbine can get full boost around 3500RPM. But you need a external gate to hold it steady.

I'm only running an RB20 so would boost control still be an issue, as .82 rear on an rb20 would be a no go.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • And if it still spikes, just for now, turn off VCT completely by disabling it OR simply unplug the solenoid. Just to rule out excessive exhaust pressure. I recall a video from Motive DVD about a decade ago, where Hawkins original single Garrett GTX3582 or so turbo had boost control issues sub 1.4bar of boost as well.   Food for thought? Is there anyway you can peg the WG completely open and/or dodgily not plumb it back into your exhaust system for testing purposes?
    • I will endeavour to give it a crack sooner or later. I have the wastegate apart at the moment so I'll replace it with a smaller spring just to see what it does and if I have to go back then so be it.   If it spikes to 23 but can then be controlled back to 20, then the gate must not be 100% open... So if it's not 100% open then why can't it drop the boost even further than 20psi (I understand it's not linear). What a headache this whole thing is.
    • Either the WG is reaching full opening, or it is not. The "it is not" case could only occur if there was not enough time available to swing the valve fully open during that boost event. I would consider that to be unlikely, as this is a commercial product that is in use elsewhere, so it really should work. But in your case, because there is definitely SOMETHING wrong, it should not be assumed that things like that are working as they should. You should put a video camera where it can see the actuator (if at all possible) during a run to see how far it is moving.
    • I think you're mostly on the ball there. With the straight gate, I suspect the weight of the spring will determine how quickly the gate can close, when not run with active pressure drive on both sides of the diaphragm. Otherwise, with drive on both sides of the diaphragm, you could almost go without a spring at all, only needing one to make sure that the thing was actually closed while completely off boost and not having pressure available to drive it closed. Butterfly valves have mostly symmetric loading when there is flow going through them, meaning that the gas hitting the upstream part of the blade is balanced by the gas hitting the downstream part of the blade, which means you don't need actuator torque to overcome any non-symmetric flow induced loads. But the gas flow does impart a purely normal load against the shaft, which transfers into the bush/bearing at each end of the shaft and does increase the torque required to make the shaft turn. Only a little, but it is there. I have no feeling for the amount of force involved in a WG application, but it certainly could make an argument for a decent spring weight being required. But all of this is just peripheral to the actual problem here.
    • The answer to this would be I followed the documentation from Turbosmart which said each spring pressure could achieve a maximum of 5x it's rated pressure so the included smallest spring being the 6psi had a range up to 30psi. I went with the 12 because I figured it'd likely hover around 15psi as a base pressure however I was obviously wrong.    I have a log here that I'll dig out that is purely wastegate and no Mac valve controlling anything.   If it can't hold anywhere near 12psi, does that mean the straight gate is virtually wide open during a run? Or am I thinking about this all wrong.   I could Tee Piece into the cooler pipe pre intercooler where the wastegate gets its feed, and send that to the ecu and see how that reads, I just don't have a spare pressure sensor currently that's all.
×
×
  • Create New...