Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Got a quick question.

We were on the dyno the other night with my mates 32, we upped the boost from 1.1bar (strong, flatline 1.1 with no dropoff) to 1.4bar had a nice increase in torque and power (around 220kw) but, after boost ramps up nicely to 1.4, it slowly drops all the way to 1.1 by redline. Its as if the turbo is running out of puff.

Currently running a HKS 2530 63T with 0.64 housing, Tomei 260 cams (timing unknown at this point, but EX looks to be retarded for nice midrange judging by the CAS), HKS Adjustable actuator adjusted to achieve 1.4 bar with no bleed off, PowerFC. We previously had a mech bleed valve with actautor set to 1bar, did the same thing.

After viewing plenty of RB20 dyno sheets it seems common that people have boost drop across the revrange, so im betting on an EBC but just thought id get some input cos theyre not exactly cheap.

Must we run a EBC to control the boost? Im doubting it but could it be the cam timing affecting the boost so dramatically? Should we '0' the cams? Theyre the only other thing untouched.

Cheers!

Mat.

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I dont know much, just curious, but did i read correctly, that when the wastegate is adjusted the issue goes away? ", HKS Adjustable actuator adjusted to achieve 1.4 bar with no bleed off,"

i paid under 100$ for a hks EVC 4

The actuator is adjusted to give 1.4, what I mean is that the signal hose is connected directly from the comp cover to the actuator with nothing in-line. With this setup we still have the boost dropping.

Exhaust consists of a Long split front/dump, so long it joins at the cat, straight from japan, ultra-flow cat, and super dragger with resonator replaced for pipe.

Intake is a brand new PWR cooler, Apexi suction kit suit z32.

So i think all of that should be fine.

outta interest what rpm peak power at ?? mines higher than most ive seen obv due to cams and not alot of timing in there

6600 / 6700 peak for mine 264 in / ex hks cams

wot diff does 260 tomei's get ? gather quicker spooling as less duration?

From what I remember its around 6000, dont quote me though.

If you have adjustable cam gears then you should able to dial up the cams so as they bring the power on quicker, make the most of the cams you have.

Easy way to work out if it's the boost controller or not is to watch the wastegate flap on the dyno while the boost begins to drop.

If the flap is opening more as the boost drops then the wastegate or boost controller is the issue however if the flap stays constant or even begins to close then I'd say the compressor is simply out of flow.

6000+RPM on an RB20 with a GT2530 is getting very close to the end of the compressor map.

Easy way to work out if it's the boost controller or not is to watch the wastegate flap on the dyno while the boost begins to drop.

If the flap is opening more as the boost drops then the wastegate or boost controller is the issue however if the flap stays constant or even begins to close then I'd say the compressor is simply out of flow.

6000+RPM on an RB20 with a GT2530 is getting very close to the end of the compressor map.

Good advice. thanks.

Don't know much about GT2835's.

I'm gunna stick with this turbo coz it's great... providing I can get it to hold boost above 6500rpm

Engine is great. on 14psi for the last 3.5yrs that I've owned it and I've given it absolute curry every time I take it to the track. It loves it. 7900rpm all the time.

I've just bought a AVC-R and I think we're tuning tonight. We'll post up how it goes.

running 2835 would be like running a garrett 2871r - 3071r wouldnt it ? would make the power but larger exhaust housing would prob at the the rb20's classic lag problems ??

i run the above setup too ... car used basically track only... friggin good setup.. not too laggy except for small motokana tracks but anything else as said when on boost it holds right to limiter all day everyday and is very smooth

^^^^ let me know the results

I was going to tell you to go with a GIZZMO MS-IBC Russel but it seems it's to late now. I will have a look at my dyno graph from when I had my R32 tuned, was running HKS actuator with a AVCR but slightly different turbo, HKS2535 which is just a step up from what your running but same rear housing from memory so would be pretty close

From memory my turbo held power up to around 7200rpm but don't have the graph with me, will check when I get back. I remember putting a little extra per load on the actuator which helped boost controll but over all it wasn't the best

My AVCR spiked and ran like crap no matter how much we played with it

Cheers all for the help.

The AVC-R is a good unit, we were able to obtain a dead flat horizontal boost pressure with one of these boost controllers on a 3071R equipped SR (pretty hard hitting turbo), so hopefully, we can achieve the same on the RB20 with a good combo of preload and AVC-R settings.

Will let you all know how we go with it.

Grab a 2530 and look in the exhaust housing. The volute of the housing is tiny, Now put your hand over the exhaust at 6,000rpm and feel the air coming out. When you get so much back pressure in the exhaust housing perhaps its limiting the engines ability to hold boost at high rpm/cfm ?!?!?!??!

I dont know what that all means but a consideration

The HKS GT2530 is nearly identical to the Garrett GT2860RS.

Calculating the airflow of an RB20 at 1.4bar (assmuming 90% VE @ redline) results in approximately 43lb/min.

If you have a look at the compressor map of the GT2860RS you will see that 42lb/min at a pressure ratio of 2.4 is outside the compressor's rated operating region:

gt2860RS_739548_comp_e.gif

If you recalculate the airflow assuming boost of only 1.1bar, then at 8000rpm the engine is demanding 37lb/min of air. This is right on the max end of the compressor's map.

I'd say this is the problem man. The compressor is simply too small, and the boost is bleeding back to the region where the compressor is efficient at that rpm; 1.1bar.

Edited by Equinox

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...