Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Interesting to see how far they go with this, but I did see a white WRX MY02 ish very very Modified pulled over today when I came out of a meeting in the city.

Looked like the bloke was getting a ticket for something

Poor Bugger

mmmmm

What are they hoping to achieve?

I saw 5 police cars last night and they didn't look sideways at me!

Well thats the thing.

But when I have another car to drive.... (which I was going to reg tomorrow even before reading this)

I was near a bunch of cops, in front of me or behind me today, not even a look over. I dont think its legal to pull over everyone without suss?

drive normal ,dont mod your car over the top, no worries

hopefully

probably cos the majority of cops working on the streets are smart enough to realise its all publicity bullshit, they are on the roads every day, they dont need TT or ACA to tell them to pull us over. its the guys up high who are on the media's tight leash, lapping up the shit the media pours out.

I was near a bunch of cops, in front of me or behind me today, not even a look over. I dont think its legal to pull over everyone without suss?

lol, dunno if it is or isnt, but it sure as fark doesnt stop them from doing it

Not true fellas,

just did a big lap, past BP @ torrens and south (2 other skylines there), BP west Tce, Town, Down south past Villis...

Saw plenty plenty boys in blu, $hat my pants, don't forget my car stands out like anything with the graphics, never got a second look....

I think maybe they are saying that to show they are responding? OR some cops are doing it and some think it's BS?

Not sure, but thank the son of rajab no dramas for me tonight!! :laughing-smiley-014:

sticker on your back window saying "I am a safe responsible driver" should work

that way they know who to pull over and not to.

you know how many family men, not interested in racing what so ever drive wrx's

on the plus side i gota daily, no probs unless they start targeting oldzilla's

Went past a few boys in blue last weekend in the western suburbs in the skyline, didn't get a second look... good on them for not judging a book by it's cover i reckon. Most cops i've encountered have been pretty good in my opinion.

Cops have better things to do then pull over every WRX and skyline. Sure they might up the ante a little but not completely over the top.

Let's hope you're right...

I knew a guy who had a sticker on his bumper that said "Cops are Tops!" with the blue an dwhite squares around it like a cop car.... dude never got pulled over for ANYTHING.

One more defect and I'm getting one I reckon.

sticker on your back window saying "I am a safe responsible driver" should work

that might not work for me as that wont be able to see it from behind as my car will be sideways drifting around old ladies, children and baby seals at 100k's an hour.

just letting you lads know SAPOLs statment. i dont think they were going to start the blitz the second they broadcasted it, as some of you are calling it false, but i think sometime in the very near future there will be a defect blitz

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...