Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So some of you guys know I (and some others) love to get into big debates over american hp vs. aussie hp. I do think they can be different (but I will not accept one figure is "better" or more "accurate" than the other.) Many figures that are posted on here from around the world are shot down because they don't match the hp to mph figures you guys have. I have combed the dyno results threads and see no mph stats for a most of the posts. I was wondering if some of the experts could give some hp to mph ballpark figures for different body styles (or weights really). Examples........

R32 GTSt's are around 3000lb?

100mph-110mph = XXXrwhp'ish

110mph-120mph = XXXrwhp'ish

120mph-130mph = XXXrwhp'ish

R33 GTSt's are around 3300lb?

100mph-110mph = XXXrwhp'ish

110mph-120mph = XXXrwhp'ish

120mph-130mph = XXXrwhp'ish

R32 GTR's are around 3300lb?

100mph-110mph = XXXrwhp'ish

110mph-120mph = XXXrwhp'ish

120mph-130mph = XXXrwhp'ish

Also, how would AWD effect that equation? I think a R32 GTR weighs about the same as a R33 GTSt, correct? Would the same mph to hp figure be true? Obviously the E.T.'s are going to vary a lot with all cars depending on suspension, tires, driver, track, etc. For example, my best mph (with a Gtec) has been 127mph in a R32 GTSt. What kind of hp would you guess I'm making (o jeez, I just asked that question. Sorry :banana: )

Again, I'm just looking for broad ballpark estimates, not figures I could hold anybody too.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266848-mph-vs-hp/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Subscription post.

There is one thing I would like to point out that you have said about suspension, tyres and various other setups that will make the car perform differently, and we don't need an American to have an arguement...we have enough between ourselves lol,

and that is take one engine...Engine = 1000hp, put engine into car A. Car A has a 'no-expense-spared' and no stone unturned approach for the build up. Car A does 8.00 at 180mph. Pull engine out and Put in Car B with less spent and not as many improvements for a completely dedicated drag car, it is driven on the street. Car B does 10.00 at 165mph.

We have a couple of examples of this in Australia where engines are borrowed (and those figures above do not represent any particular one) and the times, and MPH will differ dramatically.

I still maintain that MPH is not an accurate indication of HP but moreso an accurate indication of a cars potential to do a better time and the fact that it's 'setup' may not be perfect.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266848-mph-vs-hp/#findComment-4553176
Share on other sites

If you are conserned with mph vs hp. go the extra step and put weight into it too.

Google 1/4 mile calculators from weight, et, and hp and it should give you a close enough answer.

letstorquebhp.com is a good site. You can select from 4wd, rwd to fwd too :)

Hope this helps

Edited by R33GOD
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266848-mph-vs-hp/#findComment-4553258
Share on other sites

I still maintain that MPH is not an accurate indication of HP but moreso an accurate indication of a cars potential to do a better time and the fact that it's 'setup' may not be perfect.

I would completly agree with that. Example, my times/mph are on drift type Cusco suspension, a factory viscous, 275/40R17 drag radials, and NOT on a prepped track (or any "track" for that matter :) ). I think with a better drag set up (and maybe a driver mod), I would not only have much better E.T.'s, but also a higher mph. I spin completly through 1st and 2nd gears. Glad you like the idea of the thread too :D I was worried it would be recieved as a "how much hp do I have?" post.

Also, R33god if you'll notice I did specify in the post weight (via chassis type) was a must for info.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266848-mph-vs-hp/#findComment-4553277
Share on other sites

If you are conserned with mph vs hp. go the extra step and put weight into it too.

Google 1/4 mile calculators from weight, et, and hp and it should give you a close enough answer.

letstorquebhp.com is a good site. You can select from 4wd, rwd to fwd too :)

Hope this helps

Im suspect about those to be honest as sometimes they say my car should have made 250rwkw to run 110mph, but i know thats not right :D

For the record i've run the following:

1480kg (3280lb) - i weight in @ 80kg's

220rwkw (296rwhp)

110mph

From what ive understand, thats pretty much spot on the money :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266848-mph-vs-hp/#findComment-4553357
Share on other sites

There is alot of variables that go with each persons car, so i think it would be a good idea to state not only what power and weight of car, but also what tyres and sizes along with ratio of diffs ect. Idealy to build up a diary of info it would be best to use one car,one dyno and one track and driver also performing mods as you go i would think, but im sure you could get some rough power figures v mph

Edited by SilverCal
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266848-mph-vs-hp/#findComment-4553908
Share on other sites

I know you can usually tell from avatars or screen names, but just to get people in the habit, make sure you post body type and/or weight if known. I don't think we need wheel size and gears and stuff. To much clutter for ballpark figures.

Keep it coming guys, good stuff. Maybe what type of dyno used also?

Edited by Cjmartz2k
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266848-mph-vs-hp/#findComment-4553914
Share on other sites

While various things play a part, you can still get a very good idea of where a setup 'should' be roughly with either ET or MPH if you know what car/weight and so on.

Street rubber tends to let the MPH increase a tad, where stickier seems to lower it a bit because you get to the end sooner (due to a nice low 60ft)

Recent case with R33 GTR kid, his MPH was very low for the power he had, turns out he didn't actually have that power due to a leak somewhere and less boost/power that he didnt know about.

So there is very much good merit too it

Yeah and I did a 13.6 @ 109.6 mph with 260rwkw in a 32 GTST.

260rwkw in such a light car would be good for a 115+mph, and deep into the 12s if you keep at it!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266848-mph-vs-hp/#findComment-4554001
Share on other sites

yeah mph doesnt seem to get effect greatly by tyres/ratios/60ft time. hp vs weight, you should get pretty damn close to the mph regardless of setup, unless your talking about something rediculous that you have to pedal the whole way down the 1/4

edit - refer to morosso calculator for what your car 'should' run

Edited by VB-
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266848-mph-vs-hp/#findComment-4554026
Share on other sites

Also take into effect power curve...

Really, it's the area under the torque curve that gets you down the strip quickest... :)

500RWHP Dyno queens are CONSTANTLY shown up on the strip by 300RWHP STREET cars... Purely, as the 500RWHP car has the worlds shittest power delivery...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266848-mph-vs-hp/#findComment-4554212
Share on other sites

Also take into effect power curve...

Really, it's the area under the torque curve that gets you down the strip quickest... :)

500RWHP Dyno queens are CONSTANTLY shown up on the strip by 300RWHP STREET cars... Purely, as the 500RWHP car has the worlds shittest power delivery...

A laggy motor will show zero lag if launched hard enough at drags and 99% of them wont drop boost between gears either (unless its something that doesnt come on till 6000rpm etc). Maybe a 5th gear roll on yer but from standing start no chance.

I run a t04z and car is hopeless below 4k rpm but at the drags it launches like a rocket and not one hint of lag and the time refects that. Maybe running a gt47 or twin gt3540s or something, but not a 500hp car which is gt35 or t04z territory.

mine weighs 1750kg and does 124.6mph, dyno shows 560rwhp.

Edited by unique1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266848-mph-vs-hp/#findComment-4554407
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Hey crew, Failed my WOF cause of a lower control arm, and I've decided to hit both arms, and also the compression rods at the same time(seems they're gonna be the most likely upcoming failure points from some discussions with the lads over on the G35 reddit). I've looking at these form Z1:  https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-compression-rod-p-40716.html https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-lower-control-arm-p-40674.html I asked Z1 if they'd work as it's the same platform, just RHD vs LHD. I basically got told "Lol dunno". Specifically they aren't aware of any difference but can't guarantee fitment as they haven't done it on a 350GT. So guess I'm asking is if there is any issues with using 2005 G35 coupe suspension parts on a 2005 350GT coupe? Orginally I thought it could be something in the way of the arms that each control arm is designed to be positioned around, but that'd be an engineering nightmare for Nissan needing two different shaped control arms 😅
    • ^ This. The mode door actuator is a common failure, as is the actuator and/or the actual valve for the coolant flow control valve. I also don't know how available the mode door actuator is these days. I've been meaning to look into it and get one from wherever is possible, to keep in the shed for the rainy day when mine eventually fails. Anyway, the advice to you is to search the usual NOS part supply places, or even just go to Nissan and see what they list.
    • Have you got a pic of the actuator? My guess is that unit has failed internally and was flopping around, so the previous engineer who owned it forced it to be fully open to cold air (blocking the heater core path). As far as you can tell, is anything else wrong in the system? Likely you just need a new actuator (not sure how available they are) and then "installation is the reverse of disassembly"
    • I'm happy with the Lsailt unit that I put in, it puts full Android on the top screen so you can run whatever Nav and other Apps you want, while still existing inside the factory functionality like automatic reverse cams, audio input switching, retains factory bluetooth etc. Not cheap and the install was moderate (not simple, not hard) Yours is a V36 not V37 though right?
    • Yeap, all the NC's that I originally looked at that had a hard top were PRHT, which makes the roof line look horrible, hence why I said nope to them My only caveat for another MX5 was it needed to have a hard top, and initially I didn't think you could get a detachable hard top for the NC,  like my NB had Again, a big thanks to Matty for helping me source the detachable hard top for my little girl, they are as rare as hens teeth in Australia, and the few people who have them, keep them Also to Greg, for initially pointing me in the NC direction NC PRHT 🤢🤮 Not mine (I really should take more photos of my car), but a NC with the detachable hard top 😁 To me, the difference in how the detachable hard top roof line looks, and how it actually follows the bodies lines, like they do on NA's and NB's, is chalk and cheese compared to the bulbous looking PRHT  
×
×
  • Create New...