Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i phoned my suspension guy about lowering my car today and he told me there's king springs that fit the r33 gtr. I cant find any model numbers or what to look for.

From my understanding the vspec sits 10mm lower but i want to go an extra 30-40mm lower all round. Which ones do i need? low or super low?

Im gonna keep my stock springs for backup if i get a defect so not worried about that. And not intrested in raising and lowering the car which is y im not going for coilovers. And i am on 20inch wheels so got plenty of clearance from the ground. Plus coilovers arent in my budget.

if anyone would have pics of their gtr's with these springs please post them up also.

thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/266929-king-springs-in-my-r33-gtr-vspec/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i wouldnt go lower than lows, especially on standard dampers. they should drop the car by about 20-25mm i think.

personally i think it would be a shame to see someone put super lows in a R33 GTR just to look hektik, GTR's are performance cars, spend the money on a proper suspension setup, a GTR isnt a VN commie. putting superlow kingies in a GTR is like drinking VB at a wedding.

If you want to drop the car by 30mm or more, definitely go Super Lows Kingies as Lows will only drop it by 15-20mm so you won't be able to notice the difference.

There's nothing wrong with King Springs - they are very good if you are only after Street use, however, as the guys said - definitely consider a proper coilcover setup if you want to go track.

Apart from the fact your putting 20 inch tempe rims on a GTR... I think what they are trying to say is your missing the point... Suspension is much more than just the springs... If you just put lowered springs on it the standard shocks will be out its designed window and they also aren't valved for the heavier spring...

So basically with lowered springs and 20in rims you have made your car slower in every way than the a stock one....

People don't put coilovers in so they can go up and down, they put them in so the spring is matched to the shock absorber and its designed to work together so the car handles better....

There is a thread by SK about why not to use lowered springs with the standard shocks. A search should find it, but IIRC it damages the shock, the lower you go the more risk. If you're going to lower a lot you really need to get coilovers. A few other things to consider when you a lower;

- You'll need to get adjustable arms or bushes to be able to align the car again after you lower it

- You'll probably loose ride comfort (esp with 20in rims...)

- You'll compromise the handling if you go too low

Also almost coilovers are height adjustable, which means you dont have to be stuck with whatever height lowered springs may give you.

Apart from the fact your putting 20 inch tempe rims on a GTR... I think what they are trying to say is your missing the point... Suspension is much more than just the springs... If you just put lowered springs on it the standard shocks will be out its designed window and they also aren't valved for the heavier spring...

So basically with lowered springs and 20in rims you have made your car slower in every way than the a stock one....

People don't put coilovers in so they can go up and down, they put them in so the spring is matched to the shock absorber and its designed to work together so the car handles better....

and its one thing to do it to a GTS-t, but a GTR? dont know why ud spend an extra 10-15k for the performance of a GTR if ur just gonna ruin the thing with shitty mods.

and its one thing to do it to a GTS-t, but a GTR? dont know why ud spend an extra 10-15k for the performance of a GTR if ur just gonna ruin the thing with shitty mods.

Not even a GTS T deserves that...

a GTS maybe... IF THAT.

if you replace the springs, replace the shocks as well, you can get a decent setup with shocks and springs that can actually perform surprisingly well, but coilovers are the best way to go

Not Everybody wants the stiff ride that coilovers offer

Edited by Sigem

With a GTR if you lower it too much it will mess with the 4wd control, same goes for different wheel widths back to front, I am not sure of the specific's, have a search around there's plenty of info on it. I'm using custom king springs on older type apexi adjustable coilover shocks. They were on it when I bought the car but the reason the previous owner went to the king springs was because the apexi spring rates were too high. The springs themselves are very good and I haven't had any issues with them. The reasoning behind using shorter shocks with lowered springs is to make sure the shock is operating in it's optimal/correct range. If you use standard shocks with a shorter spring you'll find over time the car will develop a tendancy to bounce around as the shocks prematurley wear.

on a side note, I just put HSD HR coilovers in my 32 and am very happy with the result and at $1600 there not too expensive either.

so the stock springs are better than king?

i was after different opinions on springs too. not just king.

tein springs?

Your missing the point. All springs are quite similar that are used for lowering.. they are all hot wound which is sh*t but apart from that you can't lower the car at all without getting good quality shock absorbers without destroying the handling. No fancy name brand spring is going to fix the problem. The shock is what does most of the work and is also expensive.

Once you add it up you'll realise its cheaper and better just to do it properly and get good quality coilovers. That way the car which actually handle better not worse..

And yes once you lower the car 30-40mm (which is a lot) whether its with coilovers or lowered springs you are compromising the handling of the car even if you use the best quality coilovers. Cars are at a height for a reason. Nissan don't set it really high because they want it to look stupid...

So with your 30-40mm lower you are going to need rear camber arms (or bushes if your tight) so you don't chew out the inside edges of your tyres and also probably toe arms because again, the standard arms can't cope with that much lowering.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, I can confirm the TPS is at 100%.... I can confirm when we installed the TB and setup the cable that the TB was indeed fully open at max pedal travel.. the same 'curve' (WRT MAP vs MAP) existed with the previous setup/TB/manifold as well... No, we did not do a run with no intake connected. I would love to go back in time to do such a run to rule out the intake. It would have also been good to do a run with the airbox lid off. There's a test there where increased IAT vs more available air could be a positive tradeoff. I remember taking the lid off my R34 Turbo setup back in the day and noticing a monster increase, even if IAT's did go up. Could be similar. Hard to test unless I find a very deserted road. 
    • That's actually encouraging to be honest. my motor was rebuild many years ago but it's probably done less than 30,000kms and fucc all limiter or drift, majority street / drag / roll racing. It'll be fine 💪🏼 I don't even have lines or a can for the cam breathers installed yet, there is zero oil residue or splatter on or around them, it drives beautifully so it seems healthy. Just a ticky lifter, yet they're almost brand new oem genuine Nissan and haven't done many kms at all...
    • Have you confirmed the throttle body goes to WOT (and stays there) during the run?
    • I'm having a problem. I think it was mentioned above somewhere but can't see it.  I'm stuck in the cycle of, sand, filler, low spot again, put filler, sand, low spot again, now i put filler again and a thicker portion which seems to have helped but I got low spots in other areas. In the image. Circled in red thats where the original low spot was and the shape is the same as the red out line. I've more or less fixed that (still low spot up the top but now I have low spots where the green circled part is.  Is likely the issue that I didn't start with a course sand paper? I sanded the filler with 240 to reduce the risk of not going to far but maybe the issue is that I'm only taking off enough material to remove some of the filler but not the high spots. I now started sanding with 120 and I think I'm seeing a difference. I did fix one dent the other 2 are f**ked and seems like I made another low spot which is indicated by the furthest green circle on the left handside. Any thoughts and solutions?   Also second image. All of these rock chips, can they be filled in with primer or do i need to fill them all with filler/putty? So many rock chips on mine lol.
    • Well, I had an Edward Lee's special edition odo windback car/motor with a RB25DET S2 and I put down 372kW with a good amount of track abuse for 1.5 years before the ring lands decided it didn't want to stick around anymore 🥲 But probably didn't help I kept on smashing try limiter on the track and a few skid pans.
×
×
  • Create New...