Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As a simple rule of thumb, you can usually use the following formula as a guide:

(Injector CC / 5) X No. of Injectors.

That will give you flywheel hp. This is only an indication and things like rail pressure and rpm will effect their overall capability.

I would say 650-700whp would be a safe upper limit. Up the base rail pressure to 45psi and you might get them to squeeze out to 750whp but things become unsteady at that point if you haven't got the supporting hardware

Personally - I'd say 650rwhp would be the upper limit when you take into account acceleration enrichment and similar things.

I like safety blankets :P

But yeah, in the region around 400rwkw basically on PULP - rules change with Ethanol, race fuel and so on of course

Can anyone give actual figures for injectors they've used instead of just theoretical estimates? I will be pushing the limits of 700cc injectors very shortly.

So far they've done 403wkw with standard fuel pressure on 98 ron.

Can anyone give actual figures for injectors they've used instead of just theoretical estimates? I will be pushing the limits of 700cc injectors very shortly.

So far they've done 403wkw with standard fuel pressure on 98 ron.

These aren't just theoretical estimates. I gave him the ability to work it out for himself. Maybe he is going to purchase injectors and needs to know so he can decide whether or not to go for larger or smaller items.

Out of the many cars I have fitted 700cc injectors to, only 3 have ever really 'pushed close to the limit'. 420rwkw roughly for all with more room to move... none were running standard rail pressure or standard fuel pumps

Nismoid and I wouldn't have posted if we didn't have actual figures in mind.

These aren't just theoretical estimates. I gave him the ability to work it out for himself. Maybe he is going to purchase injectors and needs to know so he can decide whether or not to go for larger or smaller items.

Out of the many cars I have fitted 700cc injectors to, only 3 have ever really 'pushed close to the limit'. 420rwkw roughly for all with more room to move... none were running standard rail pressure or standard fuel pumps

Nismoid and I wouldn't have posted if we didn't have actual figures in mind.

You and Nismopid are tight aye Dan. :D

These aren't just theoretical estimates. I gave him the ability to work it out for himself. Maybe he is going to purchase injectors and needs to know so he can decide whether or not to go for larger or smaller items.

Out of the many cars I have fitted 700cc injectors to, only 3 have ever really 'pushed close to the limit'. 420rwkw roughly for all with more room to move... none were running standard rail pressure or standard fuel pumps

Nismoid and I wouldn't have posted if we didn't have actual figures in mind.

Wasn't supposed to come across as having a go, was just curious to see what figures people have seen on the dyno. 650rwhp is a nice figure, but I've never seen 700's do that before (personally, not saying it isn't possible).

At 403wkw we were at 97% duty, so basically maxxed, but will be pushing the fuel pressure up a bit more this time, think the single nismo pump was letting it down.

Wasn't supposed to come across as having a go, was just curious to see what figures people have seen on the dyno. 650rwhp is a nice figure, but I've never seen 700's do that before (personally, not saying it isn't possible).

At 403wkw we were at 97% duty, so basically maxxed, but will be pushing the fuel pressure up a bit more this time, think the single nismo pump was letting it down.

Yeah, the fuel pump could be starting to let you down. If you have the 245L/hr Nismo pump, they are good for up to around 600whp I think. CBF doing the calculations right now but yeah, I think I worked out that the bigger GTR pump (265L/hr??) is good for up to around 750hp or so.

You may find that if you increase the pump size, your duty cycle will decrease. Or you could try increasing the fuel line size.

What size fuel line are you running?

Yeah, the fuel pump could be starting to let you down. If you have the 245L/hr Nismo pump, they are good for up to around 600whp I think. CBF doing the calculations right now but yeah, I think I worked out that the bigger GTR pump (265L/hr??) is good for up to around 750hp or so.

You may find that if you increase the pump size, your duty cycle will decrease. Or you could try increasing the fuel line size.

What size fuel line are you running?

GTR nismo pump flows 276L per hour. with the stock/nismo wiring. and with good power feed with flow every mil of that if not more.

a set of 6 700cc injectors can flow 252 L per hour at 100% open. so in my eyes nismo GTR pump is the perfect match for 700cc injectors. it should be just able to oversupply them.

edit: I've run nismo GTR pumps in a number of my cars, with stock 440 njectors, 600cc injectors and the sard 700cc inejctors. no problems with any of those set-ups, but never really stretched any of those systems.

Can anyone give actual figures for injectors they've used instead of just theoretical estimates? I will be pushing the limits of 700cc injectors very shortly.

So far they've done 403wkw with standard fuel pressure on 98 ron.

poo poo did 627rwhp on 700cc injectors

single 044 in tank, i think fuel pressure was 3 bar or whatever standard is

i wouldnt think ur going to push the limits of them with a gt35r :D

GTR nismo pump flows 276L per hour. with the stock/nismo wiring. and with good power feed with flow every mil of that if not more.

a set of 6 700cc injectors can flow 252 L per hour at 100% open. so in my eyes nismo GTR pump is the perfect match for 700cc injectors. it should be just able to oversupply them.

edit: I've run nismo GTR pumps in a number of my cars, with stock 440 njectors, 600cc injectors and the sard 700cc inejctors. no problems with any of those set-ups, but never really stretched any of those systems.

remember that a nismo pump flows 276l/hr at a specific pressure (i think around 3 bar), when you increase the pressure with boost (say 1.5 bar) it actually flows less than that...

all pumps are rated at a particular quoted pressure. at least the nismo one is quoted at the actual base pressure of a modern EFI system. 3 bar. sure pumps flow changes with pressure (they will increase to a point, then hold, then drop and some like walbro's will drop drastically at a given pressure).

all skyline systems run a 3 bar system + boost. I haven't seen a nismo pump @ base + 1.5 bar be unable to supply 6 X 700cc injectors at around 90% duty. They are designed for boosted EFI applications so they do handle pressure a lot better than some pumps that are designed for high flow, low pressure systems. which is where people get caught out.

when you say it flows less than 276l/ph @ base + 1.5bar, how much less does it flow? I'd be keen to know what you found as I'm running one in the new car too. and in my previous experience it doesn't flow less than quoted.

GTR nismo pump flows 276L per hour. with the stock/nismo wiring. and with good power feed with flow every mil of that if not more.

a set of 6 700cc injectors can flow 252 L per hour at 100% open. so in my eyes nismo GTR pump is the perfect match for 700cc injectors. it should be just able to oversupply them.

edit: I've run nismo GTR pumps in a number of my cars, with stock 440 njectors, 600cc injectors and the sard 700cc inejctors. no problems with any of those set-ups, but never really stretched any of those systems.

Yeah, I think Power Enterprise and HKS rate them at 265, Nismo rate them at 276. I always like to stay ont he lower side.

With what Cerbera is saying, the flow charts for that pump are:

post-10554-1241683893_thumb.jpg

And yeah +1 on the GTR version being a perfect match for 700cc's

I have nismo fuel pump, and 800cc injector. run 1.28bar, make 312kws on all 4. the tuner told me this is the limit of this fuel pump. if go up boost, the afr will leaning out. now the afr is between 11.5-12 which is safe. but my injector duty only about 70%. tuner suggest me replace a fuel pump or surge tank setup.

does that mean my nismo fuel pump failure? or it was really tue limit of nismo fuel pump.

my car is gtr 34.

I have nismo fuel pump, and 800cc injector. run 1.28bar, make 312kws on all 4. the tuner told me this is the limit of this fuel pump. if go up boost, the afr will leaning out. now the afr is between 11.5-12 which is safe. but my injector duty only about 70%. tuner suggest me replace a fuel pump or surge tank setup.

does that mean my nismo fuel pump failure? or it was really tue limit of nismo fuel pump.

my car is gtr 34.

Is your pump still on the FPCM circuit? because what FPCM does is vary the ground in order to vary

the available current to the pump, so that at low RPM the pump isn't working very hard.

This works great with stock but at higher boost and injector

and fuel rail pressures, the pump draws more current. When it starts to need more than the FPCM

can deliver, the car will lean right out, the measured voltage over the pump will suddenly dip..

if you direct wire the pump to the alternator, it'll get 14v, not variable power, and do the best it is

ever going to do.. it'll also be one less point of failure..

Racepace told me this week that the stock GTR pump is good till over 400kw, when hardwired.

He also said they have been unable to pick any significant difference between the nismo pump and

the stock pump, the suggestion being that if the stock pump isn't good enough, you're going to need

a more elaborate fuel setup rather than just fixing it with a nismo pump.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...