Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As a simple rule of thumb, you can usually use the following formula as a guide:

(Injector CC / 5) X No. of Injectors.

That will give you flywheel hp. This is only an indication and things like rail pressure and rpm will effect their overall capability.

I would say 650-700whp would be a safe upper limit. Up the base rail pressure to 45psi and you might get them to squeeze out to 750whp but things become unsteady at that point if you haven't got the supporting hardware

Personally - I'd say 650rwhp would be the upper limit when you take into account acceleration enrichment and similar things.

I like safety blankets :P

But yeah, in the region around 400rwkw basically on PULP - rules change with Ethanol, race fuel and so on of course

Can anyone give actual figures for injectors they've used instead of just theoretical estimates? I will be pushing the limits of 700cc injectors very shortly.

So far they've done 403wkw with standard fuel pressure on 98 ron.

Can anyone give actual figures for injectors they've used instead of just theoretical estimates? I will be pushing the limits of 700cc injectors very shortly.

So far they've done 403wkw with standard fuel pressure on 98 ron.

These aren't just theoretical estimates. I gave him the ability to work it out for himself. Maybe he is going to purchase injectors and needs to know so he can decide whether or not to go for larger or smaller items.

Out of the many cars I have fitted 700cc injectors to, only 3 have ever really 'pushed close to the limit'. 420rwkw roughly for all with more room to move... none were running standard rail pressure or standard fuel pumps

Nismoid and I wouldn't have posted if we didn't have actual figures in mind.

These aren't just theoretical estimates. I gave him the ability to work it out for himself. Maybe he is going to purchase injectors and needs to know so he can decide whether or not to go for larger or smaller items.

Out of the many cars I have fitted 700cc injectors to, only 3 have ever really 'pushed close to the limit'. 420rwkw roughly for all with more room to move... none were running standard rail pressure or standard fuel pumps

Nismoid and I wouldn't have posted if we didn't have actual figures in mind.

You and Nismopid are tight aye Dan. :D

These aren't just theoretical estimates. I gave him the ability to work it out for himself. Maybe he is going to purchase injectors and needs to know so he can decide whether or not to go for larger or smaller items.

Out of the many cars I have fitted 700cc injectors to, only 3 have ever really 'pushed close to the limit'. 420rwkw roughly for all with more room to move... none were running standard rail pressure or standard fuel pumps

Nismoid and I wouldn't have posted if we didn't have actual figures in mind.

Wasn't supposed to come across as having a go, was just curious to see what figures people have seen on the dyno. 650rwhp is a nice figure, but I've never seen 700's do that before (personally, not saying it isn't possible).

At 403wkw we were at 97% duty, so basically maxxed, but will be pushing the fuel pressure up a bit more this time, think the single nismo pump was letting it down.

Wasn't supposed to come across as having a go, was just curious to see what figures people have seen on the dyno. 650rwhp is a nice figure, but I've never seen 700's do that before (personally, not saying it isn't possible).

At 403wkw we were at 97% duty, so basically maxxed, but will be pushing the fuel pressure up a bit more this time, think the single nismo pump was letting it down.

Yeah, the fuel pump could be starting to let you down. If you have the 245L/hr Nismo pump, they are good for up to around 600whp I think. CBF doing the calculations right now but yeah, I think I worked out that the bigger GTR pump (265L/hr??) is good for up to around 750hp or so.

You may find that if you increase the pump size, your duty cycle will decrease. Or you could try increasing the fuel line size.

What size fuel line are you running?

Yeah, the fuel pump could be starting to let you down. If you have the 245L/hr Nismo pump, they are good for up to around 600whp I think. CBF doing the calculations right now but yeah, I think I worked out that the bigger GTR pump (265L/hr??) is good for up to around 750hp or so.

You may find that if you increase the pump size, your duty cycle will decrease. Or you could try increasing the fuel line size.

What size fuel line are you running?

GTR nismo pump flows 276L per hour. with the stock/nismo wiring. and with good power feed with flow every mil of that if not more.

a set of 6 700cc injectors can flow 252 L per hour at 100% open. so in my eyes nismo GTR pump is the perfect match for 700cc injectors. it should be just able to oversupply them.

edit: I've run nismo GTR pumps in a number of my cars, with stock 440 njectors, 600cc injectors and the sard 700cc inejctors. no problems with any of those set-ups, but never really stretched any of those systems.

Can anyone give actual figures for injectors they've used instead of just theoretical estimates? I will be pushing the limits of 700cc injectors very shortly.

So far they've done 403wkw with standard fuel pressure on 98 ron.

poo poo did 627rwhp on 700cc injectors

single 044 in tank, i think fuel pressure was 3 bar or whatever standard is

i wouldnt think ur going to push the limits of them with a gt35r :D

GTR nismo pump flows 276L per hour. with the stock/nismo wiring. and with good power feed with flow every mil of that if not more.

a set of 6 700cc injectors can flow 252 L per hour at 100% open. so in my eyes nismo GTR pump is the perfect match for 700cc injectors. it should be just able to oversupply them.

edit: I've run nismo GTR pumps in a number of my cars, with stock 440 njectors, 600cc injectors and the sard 700cc inejctors. no problems with any of those set-ups, but never really stretched any of those systems.

remember that a nismo pump flows 276l/hr at a specific pressure (i think around 3 bar), when you increase the pressure with boost (say 1.5 bar) it actually flows less than that...

all pumps are rated at a particular quoted pressure. at least the nismo one is quoted at the actual base pressure of a modern EFI system. 3 bar. sure pumps flow changes with pressure (they will increase to a point, then hold, then drop and some like walbro's will drop drastically at a given pressure).

all skyline systems run a 3 bar system + boost. I haven't seen a nismo pump @ base + 1.5 bar be unable to supply 6 X 700cc injectors at around 90% duty. They are designed for boosted EFI applications so they do handle pressure a lot better than some pumps that are designed for high flow, low pressure systems. which is where people get caught out.

when you say it flows less than 276l/ph @ base + 1.5bar, how much less does it flow? I'd be keen to know what you found as I'm running one in the new car too. and in my previous experience it doesn't flow less than quoted.

GTR nismo pump flows 276L per hour. with the stock/nismo wiring. and with good power feed with flow every mil of that if not more.

a set of 6 700cc injectors can flow 252 L per hour at 100% open. so in my eyes nismo GTR pump is the perfect match for 700cc injectors. it should be just able to oversupply them.

edit: I've run nismo GTR pumps in a number of my cars, with stock 440 njectors, 600cc injectors and the sard 700cc inejctors. no problems with any of those set-ups, but never really stretched any of those systems.

Yeah, I think Power Enterprise and HKS rate them at 265, Nismo rate them at 276. I always like to stay ont he lower side.

With what Cerbera is saying, the flow charts for that pump are:

post-10554-1241683893_thumb.jpg

And yeah +1 on the GTR version being a perfect match for 700cc's

I have nismo fuel pump, and 800cc injector. run 1.28bar, make 312kws on all 4. the tuner told me this is the limit of this fuel pump. if go up boost, the afr will leaning out. now the afr is between 11.5-12 which is safe. but my injector duty only about 70%. tuner suggest me replace a fuel pump or surge tank setup.

does that mean my nismo fuel pump failure? or it was really tue limit of nismo fuel pump.

my car is gtr 34.

I have nismo fuel pump, and 800cc injector. run 1.28bar, make 312kws on all 4. the tuner told me this is the limit of this fuel pump. if go up boost, the afr will leaning out. now the afr is between 11.5-12 which is safe. but my injector duty only about 70%. tuner suggest me replace a fuel pump or surge tank setup.

does that mean my nismo fuel pump failure? or it was really tue limit of nismo fuel pump.

my car is gtr 34.

Is your pump still on the FPCM circuit? because what FPCM does is vary the ground in order to vary

the available current to the pump, so that at low RPM the pump isn't working very hard.

This works great with stock but at higher boost and injector

and fuel rail pressures, the pump draws more current. When it starts to need more than the FPCM

can deliver, the car will lean right out, the measured voltage over the pump will suddenly dip..

if you direct wire the pump to the alternator, it'll get 14v, not variable power, and do the best it is

ever going to do.. it'll also be one less point of failure..

Racepace told me this week that the stock GTR pump is good till over 400kw, when hardwired.

He also said they have been unable to pick any significant difference between the nismo pump and

the stock pump, the suggestion being that if the stock pump isn't good enough, you're going to need

a more elaborate fuel setup rather than just fixing it with a nismo pump.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Cheers. Skyline is back on the menu, can’t get rid of it. It’s like a child you don’t want, or herpes 
    • I got back to Japan in January and was keen to get back on track as quickly as possible. Europe is god-awful for track accessibility (by comparison), so I picked up a first-gen GT86 in December just to have something I could jump into right away. The Skyline came over in a container this time and landed in early January. It was a bit battered after Europe, though—I refused to do anything beyond essential upkeep while it was over there. The clutch master cylinder gave out, and so did the power steering. I didn’t even bother changing the oil; it was the same stuff that went in just before I left Japan the first time. Naughty. Power steering parts would’ve cost double with shipping and taxes, so knowing I’d be heading back to Japan, I just postponed it and powered through the arm workout. It took a solid three months to get the car back on the road. Registration was a nightmare this time around. There were a bunch of BS fees to navigate, and sourcing parts was a headache. I needed stock seats for shaken, mistakenly blew 34k JPY on some ENR34 seats—which, of course, didn’t fit—then ended up having the car’s technical sheet amended to register it as a two-seater with the Brides. Then there’s the GT86. Amazing car. Does everything I want it to do. Parts are cheap, easy to find, and I don’t care what anyone says—it’s super rewarding to drive. I’ve done a few basic mods: diff ratio, coilovers, discs, pads, seat, etc. It already had a new exhaust manifold and the 180kph limiter removed, so I assume it’s running some kind of map. I’ve just been thrashing it at the track non-stop—mostly Fuji Speedway now, since I need something with higher speed after all that autobahn time. The wheels on the R34 always pissed me off—too big, and it was a nightmare getting tires to fit properly under the arches. So I threw in the towel and bought something that fits better. Looks way cleaner too (at least to me)—less hotboy, less attention-seeking. Still an R34, though. Now for future plans. There are a few things still outstanding with the car. First up, the rear subframe needs an overhaul—that’s priority one. Next, I need to figure out an engine rebuild plan. No timeline yet, but I want to keep it economical—not cutting corners, just not throwing tens of thousands at a mechanic I can barely communicate with. And finally, paint. Plus a bit of tidying up here and there.  
    • Nope, needed to clearance under the bar a little with a heat gun, a 1/2" extension as the "clearancer", and big hammer, I was aware of this from the onset, they fit a 2.0 with this intake no problems, but, the 2.5 is around 15mm taller than a 2.0, so "clearancing" was required  It "just" touched when test fitting, now, I have about 10mm of clearance  You cannot see where it was done, and so far, there's no contact when giving it the beans Happy days
    • It's been a while since I've updated this thread. The last year (and some) has been very hectic. In the second-half of 2024 I took the R34 on a trip through Germany, Italy, France and Switzerland - it was f*cking great. I got a little annoyed with the attention the car was getting around Europe and really didn't drive it that much. I could barely work on the car since I was living in an inner-city apartment (with underground parking). During the trip, the car lost power steering in France - split hose - and I ended up driving around 4,000kms with no power steering.  There were a few Nurburgring trips here and there, but in total the R34 amassed just shy of 7,000kms on European roads. Long story short, I broke up with the reason I was transferred to Europe for and requested to be moved back to Japan. The E90, loved it. It was a sunk cost of around EUR 10,000 and I sold it to a friend for EUR 1,500 just to get rid of it quickly. Trust me, moving countries f*cking sucks and I could not be bothered to be as methodical as I was the first time around.
×
×
  • Create New...