Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I see ATPTurbo now have a 1.06a/r T4 twin scroll turbine housing for the GT3076R.... this has intrigued me quite a bit! I can't help but think that could be very interesting to try.

So what are you thinking Lith, decent twin scroll manifold (i.e. Full-Race or similar) twin wastegates and GT3076R with 1.06a/a T4 divided on a stock stroke RB26 with its six throttle bodies?

So what are you thinking Lith, decent twin scroll manifold (i.e. Full-Race or similar) twin wastegates and GT3076R with 1.06a/a T4 divided on a stock stroke RB26 with its six throttle bodies?

Depends on what you want really - I'd be more inclined to go the above using a GT3582R but for an RB25 a GT3076R with twin wastegates etc on a FullRace type manifold would be pretty fantastic. Hell I am rapt with my .82a/r T3 internally gated GT3076R on my RB25 and I'm not even tapping its flow potential yet. I couldn't imagine the same thing with better spool, less restriction and 22psi pumping through it!

  • 1 year later...

How does everyone think a twin scroll GT3071R would go on an rb25det with the appropriate power, would it come on much sooner than it already does? and if so what about peak power, would it be basically the same?

Would external gate vs internal make much difference? I'm trying to figure out what the ultimate combo for response and around 280kw would be.

Edited by Rolls

Good question! I'm wondering the same thing at the moment. I have a HKS exhaust manifold I could use for a TS setup on an RB25, but i'm wondering if the results would be worth it. I was considering a GT3076R a while back but from memory couldn't find an appropriate housing.

Good question! I'm wondering the same thing at the moment. I have a HKS exhaust manifold I could use for a TS setup on an RB25, but i'm wondering if the results would be worth it. I was considering a GT3076R a while back but from memory couldn't find an appropriate housing.

Why dont you just get a Garrett EVO9 replacement twin scroll GT3071 or 3076 with internal gate.

You will find that the 0.76AR TS GT3071 will spool about the same rate as the 0.63 GT3071 but the power will be more - ie closer to the 0.82. Twin scrolls are about broadening the torque curve.

My pick for 280rwkw with the rb25 would be the TS GTX3071 with the 0.73A/R. I would expect that power at 15psi with full boost around the 3000-3200rpm range.

A twin scroll GT3071R on an RB25 would be pretty mental - I'd personally make the most of the extra transient response and torque boost the twin scroll gives and use a GT3076R, forgot all the ideas you have about the different turbos with the single entry housings and don't get too hung up on boost curves only having a couple hundred rpm difference in spool... the big draw to twin scroll to me is the increase in VE, remember we run more boost to boost torque but thats not the only way to do it.

Here is an overlay of an SR20 going from a .64a/r GT2871R to a twin scroll GT3071R from Full-Race:

sr20dyno1.jpg

I really think a twin scroll GT3076R would be the ideal on an RB25DET, we already know GT3076Rs are barely noticeably laggier than a 71R and with the extra boost in transient response and inherant torque gained with twin scroll - basically a twin scroll GT3076R should out grunt any open housing turbo bigger than a GTRS... at least once it has over 3000rpm on it.

Food for thought?

A twin scroll GT3071R on an RB25 would be pretty mental - I'd personally make the most of the extra transient response and torque boost the twin scroll gives and use a GT3076R, forgot all the ideas you have about the different turbos with the single entry housings and don't get too hung up on boost curves only having a couple hundred rpm difference in spool... the big draw to twin scroll to me is the increase in VE, remember we run more boost to boost torque but thats not the only way to do it.

Here is an overlay of an SR20 going from a .64a/r GT2871R to a twin scroll GT3071R from Full-Race:

sr20dyno1.jpg

I really think a twin scroll GT3076R would be the ideal on an RB25DET, we already know GT3076Rs are barely noticeably laggier than a 71R and with the extra boost in transient response and inherant torque gained with twin scroll - basically a twin scroll GT3076R should out grunt any open housing turbo bigger than a GTRS... at least once it has over 3000rpm on it.

Food for thought?

Jebabs!

Look at that torque curve, it's more of a straight line than a curve now!

I really think a twin scroll GT3076R would be the ideal on an RB25DET, we already know GT3076Rs are barely noticeably laggier than a 71R and with the extra boost in transient response and inherant torque gained with twin scroll - basically a twin scroll GT3076R should out grunt any open housing turbo bigger than a GTRS... at least once it has over 3000rpm on it.

Food for thought?

I guess my thinking was anything much over 280kw on the street isn't really usable so by going the 71 you gain a bit of extra response/midrange and the car will probably end up being faster.

I guess my thinking was anything much over 280kw on the street isn't really usable so by going the 71 you gain a bit of extra response/midrange and the car will probably end up being faster.

WTF? Ok, I know you and some others have seem some grudge against GT3076Rs but seriously - that post is just being silly. You don't have to like them, but don't muddle things up by making comments which are basically saying "A car running an ever so slightly larger turbo is going to be so laggy and have so little midrange torque and so much more power that it will probably be slower". Try and stick to facts for people who don't know better.

My thoughts:

1) The throttle response is going to be so tiny between those two turbos its really not going to make any difference unless you are having rolling races from 2500rpm-3500rpm, and its going to be hard to call the start accurately enough to determine if its a reaction time or a spool thing separating the cars. Once you are actually in the "fun" part of the rev range, the throttle response is going to be so small I'd venture to say it'd be impossible to quantify the difference.

2) Midrange isn't going to be higher on a GT3071R unless you are running more boost in the midrange, which is a tune thing. Both turbos will be at their controlled boost level well before "midrange"

3) Midrange punch is the most likely part of the rev range where traction will be broken - make up your mind, you want to over come the tyres or you don't?

4) Faster = sum of the parts, if a car can handle everything a GT3076R can throw at it (see Tomei STI, one of the fastest time attack cars on the globe) then its going to be faster than a GT3071R equivalent... albeit not much. If its going to be slower because of the power a GT3076R makes over a GT3071R, like the response - there isn't a night and day difference between the GT3071R and 76R power potential, you're probably already having the same issues with the GT3071R.

This has given me an idea....

I'm with Lith, there never seems to be much difference between the 71 and 76mm compressors when it comes to response in Garrett housings.

You have to lean on the 71mm compressor to make the numbers where you can sit the 76mm comp in pretty fat area and still have some headroom if you want.

saying "A car running an ever so slightly larger turbo is going to be so laggy and have so little midrange torque and so much more power that it will probably be slower". Try and stick to facts for people who don't know better.

Uhh I never said that? Don't put words in my mouth.

I said if 280kw is about the limit for the street then what is the point in going the 76? You are just going to make more peak power/torque for a slight loss in spool. Why not keep that increase in spool?

I didn't realise there was that little difference though, what kind of spool differences would be expected between the two? If it really is nothing then I see your point.

Edited by Rolls

Uhh I never said that? Don't put words in my mouth.

Rolls - you said the following: anything much over 280kw on the street isn't really usable so by going the 71 you gain a bit of extra response/midrange and the car will probably end up being faster.

I didn't realise there was that little difference though, what kind of spool differences would be expected between the two? If it really is nothing then I see your point.

Its not nothing obviously, but in the ranges you're likely to be utilising the power the difference in spool will be negligable... especially with a twin scroll housing, which is what this is about.

By setting your power ceiling to the most a GT3071R you do artificially give a GT3071R the advantage, though it'll be such a small one it'd be hard to quantify and that kind of conjecture is totally missing the point of optimising the turbo match to an engine - it makes it seem like you're just making up rules to push your view point. Keep it separate, a car running a stock turbo would be faster than a car runing a GT3071R if they are both running 9psi - but that defeats the purpose if you have a car built to run a GT3071R to its potential.

but that defeats the purpose if you have a car built to run a GT3071R to its potential.

Ok point taken, so the gains from going 71 vs 76 are so negligible its not worth it, and a 76 provides a much higher ceiling for similar response. I'm still curious though, what is the likely change in response/spool time?

I started this thread to see if people were interested in trying to nail that down instead of speculate too far.

The higher the engine speed, the smaller the difference - realistically. The main things that cause lag are the overall rotational inertia (the majority of the inertia comes from the turbine wheel which is made of heavier materials) and the wheel design. Both GT3076R and GT3071R have the same turbine which is the source of most of the inertia, and they are both 56-trim GT-series Garrett compressor wheels... on the same turbine shaft etc.

For the sake of picturing the effects of the differences between the two turbos in an overly simplified way - lets pretend both the compressor and turbine wheels on a GT3071R contribute evenly to inertia and try and work out how much more work is required to pump a certain amount of air.

Even without counting the fact the turbine and bearing resistance contribute way more to the equation that I am giving them credit for, the increase in the moment of inertia going from a 56trim 71mm comp wheel to a 56trim 76mm comp wheel on a GT30 core could result in at tops a 7% gain for 13% more flow potential.

Take into account the GT3076R pumps more air for the same rpm - ie needs ~104000rpm to push 25lb/min at 1.5bar of boost whereas a GT3071R needs ~112000rpm (9% more rpm required than something with 7% more inertia!?!) it stands to reason that in terms of transitional throttle a GT3076R might not be as bad as you'd expect.

That is very overly simplified (the maths and such forth get long winded and I should be working), but thought I'd just give some crackpot theory to the comparison :)

How about a twin scroll T67 on an RB25!!!!!! I think I have a 3/4 chub :)

That SR20 dyno sheet is unreal. From that example (and others) when choosing a twin scroll setup you should choose a slightly larger turbo then what you would choose if it wasnt twin scroll.

How about a twin scroll T67 on an RB25!!!!!! I think I have a 3/4 chub :)

Thats why god made Holset HX35s ;) That was my preferred choice when I got my GT3076R, but I was concerned at the effort to make it work. If I could I'd go back to 2006 and tell myself to go a twin scroll HX35 on a suitable manifold/wastegate setup.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...