Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

All

I have searched the forums but have not been able to find the answer.

Basically I have traced a misfire issue to what seems to be the Ignitor - we had the car on the Dyno today, changed the Ignitor and the bad misfire between 3000 - 4000 when load comes on hard went away. We checked the coils (Spitfire) and the mechanic seemed sure it was the ignitor, as we tried 2 standard coils but same problem. Also we changed spark plugs, so eliminated that issue.

However, after driving the car a good 40km the problem is back??? I have a new G4 ecu, and the car has been fully tuned, mapped last week.

Do you think the ignitor is still the issue - the one we changed it to was not new?

If I get a HKS Twin Spark amplifier does that mean I wont need the ignitor?

Any other ideas?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/272326-ignitor-issues-i-think/
Share on other sites

well if changing the ignitor solved the issue last time you would assume at least some of the problem lies there.

what plugs did you put in? and how old are the coilpacks? if the coilpacks are old then they might be struggling. and it your spark plugs are gapped at 1.1mm that won't be helping the situation either.

I had the same problem as yourself on the dyno my R32 GTR missfired from 3k to 4000 rpm badly.

I replaced my stock rb26 coils with the split fires and it was better, still we didnt know why, so then gapped the plugs down to .6mm was slightly better again bacause of small gappin, but still could not dyno car properly bacause of miss fire.

So after all this stuffing around i when out and bought 3mm cable and made extra custom earths for ignitor, engine , alloy rad, and notice a big improvement and the problem solver was changing the IGNITOR itself i got a good second hand one and by luck it worked fine then presto, the miss fire problems went and i was able to bump up the plug gapping up to .8mm and made more power cleaner and isues gone.

I think your ignitor could still be the problem if its second hand remember they are 15yr plus old now so finding a good cond old one is hard.

Cheers,

Dave.

yep, my money is on G4 cooking the ignitor, or possibly faulty earthing. both are easy to check/remedy.

and no, the HKS DLI does not replace the ignitor. it's just added to the system.

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...