431.6 on stock internals.

[IMACUL8]

Paul hasnt run the car down the quarter on his current setup..

That was his pre-bomb the crap out of the car time.

[Guest INASNT]

ash 400rwhp is 300rwkw.

What turbo are u replacing your t04e with?

[R31Nismoid]

Originally posted by INASNT

ash 400rwhp is 300rwkw.

What turbo are u replacing your t04e with?

mmm... it's as i thought then

Admittadly im not running a rising rate reg, but i surely wont be getting another 100rwkw out of just raising the pressure.

Can you get an extra 100+kw just by fitting a rising rate reg?

i would think that's quite optimistic.

And my replacement... looks something like a GT35/40 or something.

[rev210]

Originally posted by R31Nismoid

Can you get an extra 100+kw just by fitting a rising rate reg?

.

No. Sounds like your turbo is too small to get another 100rwkw anyway. It seems by the terminal and quoted power to be something around the size of a stock RB25 turbo.

[R31Nismoid]

I would obviously be adding more boost and what not.

Not just putting a reg on and expecting power.

And my turbo is most certainly not similar to that of a stock RB25 turbo, the 'quoted' power if you will... is on a quite low reading dyno.

Most R33's with 12psi (stock turbo) on the dyno in question would make 160-170rwkw... just to give you proportions.

[rev210]

Originally posted by R31Nismoid

I would obviously be adding more boost and what not.

Not just putting a reg on and expecting power.

And my turbo is most certainly not similar to that of a stock RB25 turbo, the 'quoted' power if you will... is on a quite low reading dyno.

Most R33's with 12psi (stock turbo) on the dyno in question would make 160-170rwkw... just to give you proportions.

Well, going off your terminal speed you aren't making anymore power than my R33 with a stock turbo on 10psi, given your car isn't any lighter than mine. That puts you around the 200rwkw mark on a properly calibrated dyno dynamics dyno in shootout mode.

Perhaps you are running too little boost to be within the turbo's efficency range?

[rob77]

*yawn* I am getting tired of repeating myself. I'm making 340hp (another car is making 350hp with a different turbo) and both of us are sitting on 70% injector cycle. I dont have a fuel reg just a bosch 910 fuel pump. neither of our cars seem like they are running out of fuel nor do the injectors report as being maxxed out, they are definately stock injectors as we had them out 2-3 weeks ago to be cleaned before we put the wolf3d v4 in.

[R31Nismoid]

Originally posted by rev210

Perhaps you are running too little boost to be within the turbo's efficency range?

That is more than likely...

we gave it a quick squirt on 15psi one day... and there was an instant 30kw gain up from 13psi.

But then they MAXED them out totally. (i do already have the bigger fuel pump)

Not worth me going a rising rate reg, so im getting bigger injectors anyhow.

But if rob77's are at 70%... and he has what 250rwkw.

it makes me wonder. Hrrmm...

Wat size are stock 33 injectors again?

[GTS-t VSPEC]

Stock injector size is 370cc.

No I haven't run at the drags since I had about 260rwhp, but will be running soon.

[Guest INASNT]

Originally posted by rob77

*yawn* I am getting tired of repeating myself. I'm making 340hp (another car is making 350hp with a different turbo) and both of us are sitting on 70% injector cycle. I dont have a fuel reg just a bosch 910 fuel pump. neither of our cars seem like they are running out of fuel nor do the injectors report as being maxxed out, they are definately stock injectors as we had them out 2-3 weeks ago to be cleaned before we put the wolf3d v4 in.

and all these cars are all coming from perth!!

is there a bermuda triangle around there?

[GTS-t VSPEC]

No, we just have good tuners:D

I'm sure you car will make as much power as mine:D

[Guest INASNT]

No, we just have good tuners

or perth people like to talk alot of shit!!

we are yet to see any 1/4 times to back up these high hp readings tho.

[GTS-t VSPEC]

So a 12.0 with 1.760ft on 344rwhp doesn't count then? That's what Got Boost got:D

[BU5TER]

Originally posted by GTS-t VSPEC

So a 12.0 with 1.760ft on 344rwhp doesn't count then? That's what Got Boost got:D

Its not a bad combination the RB26 in the light R32 gtst, is he also using the same tuner and ecu as you?

[GTS-t VSPEC]

He is running a Mines ECU at the moment, with plans to upgrade to the new Wolf GTR ECU soon.

[Roy]

Is it possible the methods of measuring duty cycles are perhaps accounting for variations....

So schools in, how exactly are you measuring duty cycle when you say

I'm making 340hp (another car is making 350hp with a different turbo) and both of us are sitting on 70% injector cycle

[Guest INASNT]

Originally posted by GTS-t VSPEC

So a 12.0 with 1.760ft on 344rwhp doesn't count then? That's what Got Boost got:D

we all want you to run a decent 1/4 run goddamit

[GTS-t VSPEC]

Roy, I'm pretty sure it's measured through the ECU, we both have Wolfs and when Steve plugs the laptop in he can see the duty cycle.

INASNT, I will take it down on the 22nd of November, wait till then:p

[Roy]

I imagine the ECU is measuring the signal/injector pulse width and comparing that to the full range 100%.

Is it possible that somewhere in the Wolf ECU there is a calibration issue? (Pls dont sledge me...im asking a question, not questioning the quality of the Wolf)

Has anyone using a Power Fc, re-written ECU (mines etc), Autronic, Haltec, Microtech been able to see a similar duty cycle when tuning an R33 with stock injectors at approx 250rwkws.

[GTS-t VSPEC]

Roy, I think if we were actually past the 100% duty cycle then the AFR's might start to show it:D I'm very confident it's accurate, it may have more to do with the injector drivers being particularly strong in comparison to other ECU's.