Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys. Please help me here any advice would be appreciated. This was my set up: RB30det block honed out to 3.2L< forged rods and pistons, port and polished rb25 head, stock cams and cam gears, bosch coils, cheap s*** GT45 turbo and waste gate, top mount manifold, greedy plenum, 80mm throttle body, 800cc injectors, jun oil pump, microtec ltx12s ecu. Was running perfect at 450hp at the wheels tuned by dyson rotary.

That's how i bought the car:

Now i stripped the rb25 head off and replaced it with a r32GTR head from spool import. CNC ported, Good valves(not sure what type), HKS 282 cams, tommie cam gears, Turbonetics GTK1000 turbo, Turbonetics waste gate, 6BOOST top mount manifold, STANDARD GTR PLENUM ( not sure if this is a let down), sard fuel rail, sard 820cc twin spray injectors, One in tank bosch fuel pump that feeds to a catch can with 2 bosch 040 taking fuel from catch can to fuel reg. Eboost2.

So that's a list of what i have added to it. It now only makes 430hp at the wheels on 24psi and runs like shit. where or what have I done wrong. Or what have I left out. Maybe it's my tuner. Any good tuners that are recommended around Brisbane or gold coast Please let me know as well.

Thanks for your help. And please email me at [email protected]

Thanks

post-40332-1245075213_thumb.jpg

post-40332-1245075237_thumb.jpg

post-40332-1245075278_thumb.jpg

have you got anyway of looking at the map inside the microtech? swapping from a microtech to a vipec (or anything) is not going to fix your root issue as the ecu swap wont make any more power if the microtech is tuned properly (Granted a vipec/LINK is a better ecu though).

If you do have the ability to view the maps feel free to take screen grabs of the timing curve and boost compensation curves and email them to me [email protected] it will soon be obvious if it is tune related. Another thing to check is cam timing, was it dialed in properley? or just installled at zero? ive had a few aftermarket cam gears be up to 12 degees out and then when the workshop does the install they guess the best cam setting without properly finding zero (3degrees advance on the intake and 3 retard on the exhaust seems to be a favourite) the cam timing is way out.....

Edited by URAS
have you got anyway of looking at the map inside the microtech? swapping from a microtech to a vipec (or anything) is not going to fix your root issue as the ecu swap wont make any more power if the microtech is tuned properly (Granted a vipec/LINK is a better ecu though).

If you do have the ability to view the maps feel free to take screen grabs of the timing curve and boost compensation curves and email them to me [email protected] it will soon be obvious if it is tune related. Another thing to check is cam timing, was it dialed in properley? or just installled at zero? ive had a few aftermarket cam gears be up to 12 degees out and then when the workshop does the install they guess the best cam setting without properly finding zero (3degrees advance on the intake and 3 retard on the exhaust seems to be a favourite) the cam timing is way out.....

Thanks trent. I belive that the cams are left on 0 and they havent touched them. But ill double check that. And ill get back to you with these graphs. Thanks lots for you honest help.

why did you retain the RB25 cam covers? and 450hp seems a bit low for a GT45.

With the cheap chinease GT45 it was running 20psi and making 450. Now with what i think is a better setup its only running 430 on 24psi

have you got anyway of looking at the map inside the microtech? swapping from a microtech to a vipec (or anything) is not going to fix your root issue as the ecu swap wont make any more power if the microtech is tuned properly (Granted a vipec/LINK is a better ecu though).

If you do have the ability to view the maps feel free to take screen grabs of the timing curve and boost compensation curves and email them to me [email protected] it will soon be obvious if it is tune related. Another thing to check is cam timing, was it dialed in properley? or just installled at zero? ive had a few aftermarket cam gears be up to 12 degees out and then when the workshop does the install they guess the best cam setting without properly finding zero (3degrees advance on the intake and 3 retard on the exhaust seems to be a favourite) the cam timing is way out.....

whats a Link ?

It now only makes 430hp at the wheels on 24psi

At what RPM?

My guess is tuning, that's where I would start looking. Post up the dyno graphs with A/F ratios is a good place to start.

The 282 cams are bit long in duration for an RB30, unless you are intending reving it to 10,000 rpm of course. which is not a good idea with a standard crank.

The standard GTR inlet won't be the problem, most certainly not at 430 rwhp, maybe at 730 rwhp.

How's the blow by? To get 3.2 litres (rounded) the smallest bore size is 88.2 mm (2.2 mm oversize) which is rather large for an RB30 block to handle, 87 mm (1.0 mm oversize) is the most I would go. So it may pay to check the leak down at 3 or 4 piston heights just in case the bores are oval.

What the exhaust like? You shouldn't need anywhere near 24 psi to make 430 rwhp, maybe it's choking the tubine, pumping up the boost and killing the power. Easy to check, turn the boost down to say 19 psi, if it still makes around the same power on the dyno, then drop the exhaust for one quick power run. That'll confirm whether or not the exhaust is the restriction.

Since it is running a Microtec my guess is it has had some work done on the CAS, Mictrotec's don't like the Nissan CAS signal much. You can check the trigger accuracy with a timing light, just make sure that you can see the igntion advance mapped in the Microtec actually agreeing with the timing marks. Try it at 1000 rpm increments up to say 6,000 rpm, if it's accurate then there is a good chance the trigger is OK.

If the above doesn't show anything I would be surprised, the answer is there, you just have to use the right test to find it.

Cheers

Gary

I dont see any mention of valve springs. What are you using?

Also, from my experience with the lt12s you've got to take it to a tuner who's actually used them before. I got mine tuned by a rotory specialist when i first bought it, ran perfectly. Had it retuned by a big sydney workshop with a very expensive reputation and a large amount of R35's there right now. Car ran like shit.

Then back to a guy who does a lot of rotors and what do you know, runs great again.

Note, this was with the stock nissan (mitsubishi) CAS, stock plenum etc

I dont see any mention of valve springs. What are you using?

Also, from my experience with the lt12s you've got to take it to a tuner who's actually used them before. I got mine tuned by a rotory specialist when i first bought it, ran perfectly. Had it retuned by a big sydney workshop with a very expensive reputation and a large amount of R35's there right now. Car ran like shit.

Then back to a guy who does a lot of rotors and what do you know, runs great again.

Note, this was with the stock nissan (mitsubishi) CAS, stock plenum etc

If Dyson tuned it the second time, I'd be surprised if it were a tuning issue.

Does the exhaust manifold and rear housing get red hot at full noise after a couple of runs?

Possibly as Gary has suggested is the exhaust, perhaps the cat has collapsed and is creating backpressure....

or maybe your timing belt is on one tooth out on exhaust side? Your timing might be good, but exhaust cam out by 15 degrees......sometimes silly things happen.

Maybe i missed it, did Dyson tune it the second time?

Nah, It was more of a rhetorical statement rather than a factual comment. Wasn't saying you said otherwise but just making an observation that if he had the second tune done at Dyson, it would more than likely rule out bad tuning.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...