Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi, was just looking at my front mount intercooler the other day and wondered if there was any other possibilities of how I could mount it to make piping alot shorter & less bends etc as I just have the common cooler kit piping.

My idea was (with front mount cooler) was to flip it upside down, so the inlet and outlet are closer to the top of the cooler, and route your piping from the turbo straight forward to the area by the back of the headlight/beside the radiator, then one 90 degree bend into the cooler, then another 90 degree out of the cooler back into the engine bay (same as other side) then into the plenum. This cuts out around 4 x 90 degree bends + whatever length of pipework.

Just an idea I was looking at, haven't givin it much thought though, just wanted to know if anyones ever tried a similar setup, obviously there would need to be a bit of butchery and fabricating involved but i'm fine with that.

Just throw your thoughts at me

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/274938-alternate-intercooler-piping/
Share on other sites

The problem I see with it is that if you cut into your bodywork, you'll be inviting Mr Plod to slap a canary on your windscreen as well as justifying the hassles of conforming back to ADR requirements.

Secondly, the amount of IC capacity you'll be saving will only equate to a couple of litres of volume, so in essence you won't really be making a major difference with lag/spool time.

It's your choice as to whether you do it or not, but I couldn't justify the hassle vs potential gain ratio.

You'd be better off buying a forward facing plenum if you really want to save length.

Good idea though.

Our laws in NZ aren't as harsh as yours, I wouldn't be worried about doing some cutting here and there, had to cut holes to install the kit in the 1st place and I still pass a warrent of fitness no problem, this is also with a catless exhaust, uncertified adjustables etc etc. And I wouldn't just go hacking holes here and there i'd make it look respectable. Yeah I didn't think it would cut out too much pipework but people are always saying bends are bad and that would get rid of quite afew of them. I remember seeing a picture of an r34 drift car in a magazine ages ago with no headlights and you could see the silicon elbows where each headlight would've been, and it was obviously for cooler piping.

Thanks for you input though, anyone else's thoughts...?

do it, the shorter the better. Less piping means not only some saving in capacity but also reduces the amount of piping that can and will absorb heat. In my other project car i have such short piping due to the flipped cooler method you spoke of that my intake pipe stays cool to touch even on long drives. The turbo side only reaches luke warm so i assure you the intake temps will thank you which will equate to a worthy gain. As said above though a forward facing plennum is a must.

My mate is currently doing the same thing on his s13. he has actually managed to mount the coolerwhere the radiator is located up where the radiator support is, and made custom brackets to push the radiator back a little and now running a thermo fan. If you had a front facing plenum with this setup, it would be quite good. I wouldnt mind trying it on my car.

Another possible way to go is to use a liquid to air intercooler made by PWR. Im interested to see the results of this too. http://www.pwr.com.au/#/view=products/s=is/

yeah my mates with a 180sx and a 13 with s14 sr20det have both done the "push the radiator back and put cooler upsidedown" it works bloody awesome . the pipe from the turbo to the cooler is like a foot long an elbow on either end . the other pipe is way short . one elbow off intercooler and part of the existing frontmount piping . since doing it there is like 5 foot of ic pipe lyin on the floor . and it worked usin all the bits we had lyin round . yeah with out front facing plenum there is only so much you can do

I also wondered about heatsoak from the radiator but I guess if you did mount the radiator back further and use a thermo fan you would have a bit of room to play around with to mount the cooler. Sounds like more people have attempted it than I thought.

I also wondered about heatsoak from the radiator but I guess if you did mount the radiator back further and use a thermo fan you would have a bit of room to play around with to mount the cooler. Sounds like more people have attempted it than I thought.

forget thermos, the best cooling solution is the std clutch fan.

The massive amount of work done on this s13 was to revert back to the clutch fan.

ok, yeah I was considering swapping to a thermo fan but after reading all the debates on here I had second thoughts. Looking at my car if I was to remove the centre vertical part of the body that the bonnet latch is on there would be plenty of room to mount a cooler and would avoid heatsoak from radiator, but would have to install bonnet pins if I ditched the latch mechanism.

yeah the factory fan is a bastard for power sucking (and noise!) but it cools miles better than 99% of thermo set-ups I've seen on RB powered cars. almost without fail every guy I've seen switch over to a thermo or thermo's has had problems.

for a street car, there is little point.

the difference to a 150-300kw setup would be minimal at best....

would be better off custom fitting a bigger side mount cooler with carfully selected piping

alternatively if u were going to stick to ur method..... look into getting a radiator that is thicker but not as wide... so ull have room for some cooler pipes either side.... as apposed to cutting

heat soak from the radiator shouldn't be too much of an issue for a few reasons, but mainly because of the fact that air is being drawn through the cooler, then through the radiator. using thermos would probably actually make the problem worse if they are hooked up like on some cars where they will turn off completely. clutch fans will always draw some air no matter the temp or engine speed.

as for the piping, short is always better. it isn't just so the air has to travel a shorter distance, it is also less volume that has to be filled when opening the throttle. heat soak through the actual piping isn't really an issue as the air is travelling at a reasonable speed.

a mate of mine had extremely short piping on his sr20 in his sigma. had a 450mm wide radiator between the headlights with the outlets at the top and the pipe basically went straight from the turbo to the cooler and straight from the cooler to the manifold. probably only 50cm of pipe each side. it was very short, much shorter than on most skylines. but on the sigma it was much easier to have a setup like that than on a skyline

yeah the factory fan is a bastard for power sucking (and noise!) but it cools miles better than 99% of thermo set-ups I've seen on RB powered cars. almost without fail every guy I've seen switch over to a thermo or thermo's has had problems.

if i was ever to do a swap to themos i would use factory ones of a car that runs them rather than aftermarket ones. atleast then you know they have had some R&D into the design.

I think most people have problems with thermos as they don't shroud the fans well enough or at all, if I was to use a thermo i'd use a single 16" fan inside the existing shroud. Thats a good idea about getting a radiator that isn't as wide, would make things alot easier.

mad082 - what were the results of your mates short piping on the sigma? any noticable gains?

I think most people have problems with thermos as they don't shroud the fans well enough or at all, if I was to use a thermo i'd use a single 16" fan inside the existing shroud. Thats a good idea about getting a radiator that isn't as wide, would make things alot easier.

mad082 - what were the results of your mates short piping on the sigma? any noticable gains?

16" in a shroud wont do jack all unfortunatley.... unless you just put around, any spirited driving sends temp gauge out of control.

Edited by URAS
I think most people have problems with thermos as they don't shroud the fans well enough or at all, if I was to use a thermo i'd use a single 16" fan inside the existing shroud. Thats a good idea about getting a radiator that isn't as wide, would make things alot easier.

mad082 - what were the results of your mates short piping on the sigma? any noticable gains?

don't know what the difference was as he set it up like that when he did the conversion

if i was ever to do a swap to themos i would use factory ones of a car that runs them rather than aftermarket ones. atleast then you know they have had some R&D into the design.

Your on the right track.

I run falcon AU thermos (2 x 12 inch fans) complete with shoud on my SR with 290 rwk's no drama's - temps are typically stable between 80 and 85 with stock t-stat - most i've seen is 90 with aircon on in 40+ degree heat. I spent a bit of time sealing gaps with rubber and foam to ensure the air got pulled through the rad. Also run stock undertray. I also wired the fans to run separate low and high temp settings which is controlled by the Autronic.

My brother's VZ LS2 with twin turbos, 100mm thick intercooler and 380 rwk's, air con, etc runs factory thermo's and no drama's either.

The thing with the factory thermo's is that the shrouds cover the entire rad so the fans pull air through the entire core.......unlike plonking 2 x 12 or 1 x 16 inch Davies Craig fans, or smilar, on the core which only pull air through part of the core.

Also checkout this article which further supports my views http://autospeed.com/cms/A_111234/article.html

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...