Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well technically the engine in your car has 1.998 litres so you fall outside the range unfortunately.

You must also love that piece of shit 2 litre 6 cylinder engine in the Eunos 30X.

Wow :O some one has sand in their vag!

Anyway, recently I have read a lot of info on inline 6's and the more I read about them the more I like them. Especially the way they are balanced with crankshaft design. It seems a bit disappointing how BMW in the new M3 have gone to a 4.0L V8... kind of hor the GTR went to a V6 :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/275466-inline-6/page/3/#findComment-4680578
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

i love the sound of skylines (oddly enough i prefer the sound of the rb25 over a 26), and i really like the sound of the ford 'barra' turbo (xr6t motor) as they sound a lot like a rb, but beefier, but there is one breed of engine that gets me harder than chinese algerbra and it isn't a 4, 6 or 8 cylinder.........

lamborghini exhaust note ftmfw!!! either their v10 or v12.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/275466-inline-6/page/3/#findComment-4680641
Share on other sites

"i love the sound of skylines (oddly enough i prefer the sound of the rb25 over a 26)"- Ever since swapping from RB25 Stagea to a GTR I have been thinking a similar thing..

Inline 6 love for me started with an old 4.2 LPG Patrol, "Hmmm, turning right at a round about, 4th gear should do it," and with a set of extractors and a big zorst on it, it sounded sweet.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/275466-inline-6/page/3/#findComment-4694166
Share on other sites

So people do realise the BMW are dropping all in line 6s next model range. Ditto Ford, Merc and Holden already doing so. Nobody is making straight 6s. Does anybody actually make an all alloy straight 6? Didnt think so for pretty obvious reasons. Even the M engines are all cast iron blocks

I can live with the death of the straight 6 if all the replacements are 2.5-4.0L V10s and :) But they wont be so it just sux

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/275466-inline-6/page/3/#findComment-4694436
Share on other sites

So people do realise the BMW are dropping all in line 6s next model range. Ditto Ford, Merc and Holden already doing so. Nobody is making straight 6s. Does anybody actually make an all alloy straight 6? Didnt think so for pretty obvious reasons. Even the M engines are all cast iron blocks

I can live with the death of the straight 6 if all the replacements are 2.5-4.0L V10s and :yes: But they wont be so it just sux

umm..... holden did it about 20 years ago........

but v6's aren't all bad. remember that the new gtr has one

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/275466-inline-6/page/3/#findComment-4695255
Share on other sites

umm..... holden did it about 20 years ago........

but v6's aren't all bad. remember that the new gtr has one

And people say GM are behind, but look at everyone playing catch up on the V engine game :yes:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/275466-inline-6/page/3/#findComment-4695452
Share on other sites

And people say GM are behind, but look at everyone playing catch up on the V engine game :D

GM are behind hence why they are in position they are in, trying to keep their head above water. If you looked at their financial position years ago they were miles ahead of Ford, however Ford had a lot more money tied up in R&D which may have helped...

Back OT, it sucks everyone is going the V mainly due to reasons of packaging especially in performance cars, I think it is a poor compromise. I think BMW dropping the inline especially in their performance models is a real shame!

F**k it lets just all buy a TVR Tuscan S!!!!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/275466-inline-6/page/3/#findComment-4695782
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
    • Yes that’s another issue, I always have a front mount, plus will be turbo plus intake will big hasstle. I’ve been told if it looks stock they’re fine with it by a couple others who have done it ahahaha.    I know @Kinkstaah said the stock gtt airbox is limiting but I might just have to do that to avoid a defect so it atleast looks legit. Or an enclosed pod so it’s hidden away and feed air from the snorkel and below Intercooler holes like kinstaah mentioned. Hmm what to do 
×
×
  • Create New...