Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

thew r32's are a very sexy car and go jsut as hard as an r33.

they are also much more exclusive as we can only get one year of their prodiction from the 6 month 92 till 93. they tend to be in better nick . thery are oh so sexy compared to the r33.

who could not love this

meggala

mycar1.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/2782-why-do-r32-gts-ts/#findComment-51847
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Issue is GTST's not GTR's. I think everyone agrees all GTR's kick ass! :rolleyes:

Humm 160kw or 187kw........187 for me thanks.

yet they are still slower.

R33 GTST - Overweight, underpowered, low body rigidity & RB25 that breaks easier.

RB20's are strong, almost as powerful evidence is the JMS car, that thing took a pounding, put out very decent power figures and was internally stock and still going strong.

btw - have seen R33 Gtst nearly beaten (was extremely close) by NA Supra. Both cars were standard, with similar driving skills.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/2782-why-do-r32-gts-ts/#findComment-59874
Share on other sites

Originally posted by NIZ30

Issue is GTST's not GTR's. I think everyone agrees all GTR's kick ass! :)

 

yet they are still slower.

R33 GTST - Overweight, underpowered, low body rigidity & RB25 that breaks easier.

RB20's are strong, almost as powerful evidence is the JMS car, that thing took a pounding, put out very decent power figures and was internally stock and still going strong.

btw - have seen R33 Gtst nearly beaten (was extremely close) by NA Supra. Both cars were standard, with similar driving skills.

I didn't want to go this far to prove that you are wrong but anyway. Visit this link http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~arvidson/specs.htm check the specs, the figures speak for themselves. The R33 Gtst is faster on paper then the R32 Gtst. It's a known fact. And as for the comment about the RB25 breaking easier, well are you a mechanic? :rolleyes:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/2782-why-do-r32-gts-ts/#findComment-59942
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No. GKTech arms have spherical bearings in them. No bushes. You will not need bushes for those arms. The sphericals are a bit of a maintenance nightmare. I have replaced all of mine several times in the 5 or so years I've had them, and I have the arms out regularly to clean and lube the balls. Worth the pain on an R32, because the standard arm design is trash. If you need the camber adjustment, there are other options (than the GKTech ones), although I would still lean towards and prefer the GKTech ones, even with the maintenance load of the sphericals. The caster adjustment is also highly valuable, allowing for setting the car up to drive straight. There are a million options for these, including the GKTech ones. I've had Tein rods on mine for 20 years and the balls are much less trouble in that location. Never given me a moment's pain. All positives, no negatives. I consider them compulsory.
    • Lol yeah I ordered the clips mentioned and as far as the amayama diagrams go i think thats all I'll need. Fogured id ask, sometimes people's first hand experience doesnt always match up to diagrams haha, i guess I'll wing it and worse comes to worse I'll just deal with it as I go
    • Thanks for all that information I appreciate it. To answer your questions: - Yep that's what I mean. These guys are professional painters to so I must be missing something. It's a bit hard to explain. - With the primer landing on clearcoat, I make sure that the surrounding clearcoat is scuffed to 240 grit as my epoxy primer says that I only need to sand the area to 240 grit. - Yeah so similar to the first question, assuming that the paint landed on the unscuffed clearcoat because I've seen that happen. - Yep I want to prep the surface in that order. Only reason because epoxy primer will protect it from rust and I need that atm with this crappy Sydney weather. I think I was worried about time, if I try to put the filler down but screw it up somehow and I don't have time to sand it off and reapply it then need to put primer later that it might start to rust again so I wanted to apply the primer as quick as possible to not deal with rust.  - I just deleted some answers, I just realised after watching a video and what you said about looking at the data sheet, that I need to read the data sheet on the specific filler I'm using. It's possible now that I put epoxy primer first was a waste of time and need to go to bare metal lol
    • I did. I went to a suspension guy and he told me because I don't have adjustable camber arms it's the reason why my car veers towards the left if I take my hands off the wheel but if I drive my other every day car and take my hands off the steering wheel it goes completely straight. I think it's common with Skyline's. In order to fix the problem, I likely need gktech camber arms then nismo bushes since I have poly bushes atm, then a wheel alignment after that. With my car if I take my hands off the steering wheel on a really bumpy road before stopping at a light I have to hold my steering wheel somewhat tight otherwise my car will legit just go completely in the other direction quite quickly and I'll slam into something lol instead of stopping straight. I Believe this YouTuber had the same issue and fixed it with gktech arms. At timestmap 6:05 he talks about how the car doesn't veer anymore after installing these arms.  
    • hello! does anyone have a schematic that shows how to test the blower motor resistor for the vac system? i believe the part# is 27761-15U00. I think the resistor is toast, but would like to be able to test it somehow before i embark on the journey to find a new one. cheers! 27761-15U00
×
×
  • Create New...