Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just wondering why nobody makes an upper arm for skylines that positions the outer bushes further backwards and tilted to get more positive caster without crazy bush deflection?

They could be used in conjunction with caster rods to get like 5.5 degrees of caster in a GTR without huge rubbing problems couldn't they?

Just very interested to know why nobody does them???

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If you need for your s14, I had some made for my Datto(LCA's, too suit macpherson strut car) that were also camber adjustable. Machined from billet, will upload photos when I get home. Randy at Nissco in Vic can arrange them for you. Www.Nissco.com.au

If you need for your s14, I had some made for my Datto(LCA's, too suit macpherson strut car) that were also camber adjustable. Machined from billet, will upload photos when I get home. Randy at Nissco in Vic can arrange them for you. Www.Nissco.com.au

Nothin to do with the S14. They don't even have front upper arms. Question applies to skylines only.

Just wondering why nobody makes an upper arm for skylines that positions the outer bushes further backwards and tilted to get more positive caster without crazy bush deflection?

They could be used in conjunction with caster rods to get like 5.5 degrees of caster in a GTR without huge rubbing problems couldn't they?

Just very interested to know why nobody does them???

There are a number of reasons.

1. Castor is nice to have, but of much less importance than camber.

2. R32 GT-R's only have 3 degrees stock & increasing this to 4 or even 5 only gives you a small gain.

3. There are problems with increasing castor as it rotates the upright & stresses the bushes by forcing them to rotate on an axis somewhat different to the geometry they have. Doesn't much matter if you do it by pushing the bottom arm forward (which is easier) or pulling the top arm back.

4. No one makes a decent upper arm for camber, let alone for castor.

1. Castor is nice to have, but of much less importance than camber.

Not true at all in my opinion. More caster gives u more camber on the outside wheel when cornering (when you need it) and allows U to run less static negative camber so better braking grip and better traction for 4WD's.

2. R32 GT-R's only have 3 degrees stock & increasing this to 4 or even 5 only gives you a small gain.

So a way to DOUBLE the standard 3 degrees to 6 degrees is a small gain? :devil:

3. There are problems with increasing castor as it rotates the upright & stresses the bushes by forcing them to rotate on an axis somewhat different to the geometry they have. Doesn't much matter if you do it by pushing the bottom arm forward (which is easier) or pulling the top arm back.

That's why I said the angle of end of the upper arm has to be different to make up for the caster. I can't see why it can't be done easily.

4. No one makes a decent upper arm for camber, let alone for castor.

There are some decent ones out there like the ikeya formula bush type ones but pricey (well worth it IMO)

Edited by bradsm87
Not true at all in my opinion. More caster gives u more camber on the outside wheel when cornering (when you need it) and allows U to run less static negative camber so better braking grip and better traction for 4WD's.

I run quite a bit of neg camber on my R32 R. The contribution the 4 degrees castor makes to the tyres camber angle when you have turned the steering wheel 90 degrees is not very much. You can do the sums if you want & you will get the same result.

As for braking grip there is no shortage of front end grip with this setup. Nor traction particularly. But as the GT-R doesn't even have a front LSD standard it is a meaningless argument.

So a way to DOUBLE the standard 3 degrees to 6 degrees is a small gain? :devil:

Going from three degrees to four degrees is less influential than going from eight to nine, for example.

That's why I said the angle of end of the upper arm has to be different to make up for the caster. I can't see why it can't be done easily.

So what are you going to do for the upper link bracket that is fixed to the chassis? Nismo offer a one of thse as part of a kit. Unsurpisingly it rotates the axis around which the upper arm moves. But is costs far too much for a modified stock component.

There are some decent ones out there like the ikeya formula bush type ones but pricey (well worth it IMO)

Well you have to like running suspension without bushes. Which isn't good on the road, nor with poor geometry.

Edited by djr81
I run quite a bit of neg camber on my R32 R. The contribution the 4 degrees castor makes to the tyres camber angle when you have turned the steering wheel 90 degrees is not very much. You can do the sums if you want & you will get the same result.

As for braking grip there is no shortage of front end grip with this setup. Nor traction particularly. But as the GT-R doesn't even have a front LSD standard it is a meaningless argument.

Going from three degrees to four degrees is less influential than going from eight to nine, for example.

I think 5.5 - 6 degrees is acheivable which has gotta make a difference.

So what are you going to do for the upper link bracket that is fixed to the chassis? Nismo offer a one of thse as part of a kit. Unsurpisingly it rotates the axis around which the upper arm moves. But is costs far too much for a modified stock component.

With urethane bushes and coilovers with relatively short suspension travel, just having the end of the upper arms 'turned' compared to the inner part of the arm would be more than sufficient without causing much deflection of the bushes at all. Changing the position of the bracket wouldn't be necessary. I am more thinkin for an R33 or R34 anyway.

Well you have to like running suspension without bushes. Which isn't good on the road, nor with poor geometry.

That's why i said the bush type ones. They make both pillow ball and bush type arms.

I think 5.5 - 6 degrees is acheivable which has gotta make a difference.

With urethane bushes and coilovers with relatively short suspension travel, just having the end of the upper arms 'turned' compared to the inner part of the arm would be more than sufficient without causing much deflection of the bushes at all. Changing the position of the bracket wouldn't be necessary. I am more thinkin for an R33 or R34 anyway.

Even the Whiteline stuff will get you those sort of numbers on an R33, ie 5.5 degrees castor. They have more castor stock than the R32's & better front suspension anyway.

Yeh it'd be possible but would require modifying stuff for clearance. Would be nice to get lots of caster and no rubbing anywhere. Also I dunno how far u can go without stuffin up the angle of the front driveshaft.

djr81 is 100% correct with pretty much everything his stated about the GTR.

And how is that? Be specific.

So because u have a quick gtr mean's there's no point thinkin outside the box to make it quicker?

I guess audi, porsche, mercedes, R35 GTR etc Have it all wrong then. Caster must be useless.

Even the Whiteline stuff will get you those sort of numbers on an R33, ie 5.5 degrees castor. They have more castor stock than the R32's & better front suspension anyway.

stagea gets around 5deg easily too

For about 6 months now I have been trying some eccentric crush tubes in the inner pivot points of an R33/34 front upper control arm. It's based on a design that I have used in double wishbone Hondas for many years. Moves the top outer pivot point rearwards enough to get 6 to 7 degrees caster without excessive drive shaft angles. I don't know that it will ever go into mass production as there probably isn't enough demand for it.

It's R32's that have the real issue with their narrow spaced upper control arm inner pivots. That's why they chew through bushes and spherical bearings in a rapid fashion. No easy solution there, that's why Nissan changed the design in the R33/34's.

Cheers

Gary

For about 6 months now I have been trying some eccentric crush tubes in the inner pivot points of an R33/34 front upper control arm. It's based on a design that I have used in double wishbone Hondas for many years. Moves the top outer pivot point rearwards enough to get 6 to 7 degrees caster without excessive drive shaft angles. I don't know that it will ever go into mass production as there probably isn't enough demand for it.

It's R32's that have the real issue with their narrow spaced upper control arm inner pivots. That's why they chew through bushes and spherical bearings in a rapid fashion. No easy solution there, that's why Nissan changed the design in the R33/34's.

Cheers

Gary

Do it man. That really sounds IDEAL.

For about 6 months now I have been trying some eccentric crush tubes in the inner pivot points of an R33/34 front upper control arm. It's based on a design that I have used in double wishbone Hondas for many years. Moves the top outer pivot point rearwards enough to get 6 to 7 degrees caster without excessive drive shaft angles. I don't know that it will ever go into mass production as there probably isn't enough demand for it.

It's R32's that have the real issue with their narrow spaced upper control arm inner pivots. That's why they chew through bushes and spherical bearings in a rapid fashion. No easy solution there, that's why Nissan changed the design in the R33/34's.

Cheers

Gary

Superpro sell these off the shelf. They are easy to buy.

Superpro sell these off the shelf. They are easy to buy.

Not quite, they are designed to be adjusted in tandem, ie; for camber, hence the inner pivot points on upper control arm are parrallel to the inner guards. When aiming for more caster the outer pivot point on the upper control arm needs to be moved rearwards, so the inner pivot points are no longer parrallel to the inner guards. The solution is for the bushes and/or eccentric crush tubes to be offset to compensate. I tested the offset eccentric crush tubes first because they are easily machined up. But the geometry is such that the bushes themselves have to accommodate the misalignment. Those were machined out of a slug of polyurethane, which is OK for testing, but not cost effective for selling. For production volumes you would needot have them moulded in the usual fashion, that's where the lack of potential volume would be a killer.

Cheers

Gary

And how is that? Be specific.

So because u have a quick gtr mean's there's no point thinkin outside the box to make it quicker?

I guess audi, porsche, mercedes, R35 GTR etc Have it all wrong then. Caster must be useless.

Oh thats funny.

My GTR is so outside the box its ridiculous.

There is not one original suspension pick up point on the R32, everything is custom from the mounting locations to the arms themselves. The angles, roll centers, everything is totally different to the original car

We totally redesigned the suspension to run a wishbone style upper and lower arm. It works well but not well enough to warrant the cost should you have to pay someone to do it for you.

There is nothing that wrong with the original car and id not build another that way again.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even more fun, leave all the ADAS stuff plugged in, but in different locations, hopefully avoid any codes!   And honestly, all these new cars with their weird electronics. Pull all the electronics out Duncan, and just shove an aftermarket ECU and if needed a trans controller in, along with a PDM. Make it run basic but race car styled!
    • To follow up a question from earlier too since I had the front bar off again (fking!) This is what is between the bumper and the drivers side wheel And this is the navigator side, only one thing but its a biggy! So basically....no putting coolers in the wheel arches without a lot of moving other stuff. Assuming I move to properly race prepping this car I'll take that job on and see how the computers respond to removing a whole bunch of ADAS modules
    • So I prepped the car for another track day on Wednesday (will be interesting to see coolant temps post flushing out and the larger reservoir, with a forecast of 3-14 being 20o cooler than last time I took it out). Couple of things to mention; since I am just driving the car and not taking a support vehicle, I took the rear seats out and just loaded the back up Team Trackday style. Look at all that space! To cover off removing the rear seat....it is weird (note the hybrid is probably different because it wouldn't have folding rear seats) Basically, you remove the lower seat base, very similar to a r series but it is a clip that pulls forward to release the base rather than it being bolted down. Easy Then, you need to remove the side section of the rear seat on each side. There is a 14mm head nut at the bottom of the side piece, the it slides upwards off a hook at the top to release; you also need to unhook the seatbelt from the loop at the top. Then the centre piece is weird. You need to release/fold the seats forward with the tab in the boot on each side From there, there are 2,x12mm headed bolts holding the rear of each seat to the folding bracket, under the trim between the rear seat and the boot (4x christmas tree clips there, they suck). The seat is out but you can see where the bolts attach to the bracket
    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
×
×
  • Create New...