Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok guys..... Be patient ok :D

Those ceramic fu@#ers has me reallllly bummy on the 26 , so i was weighing out the cost of changing them to a set of steels (garrett equivalent to gt-ss) or slapping on some extra gear to the perfectly good 25det i have sitting in my garage, and put it back in.

One of the main factors too is that 26 parts here(not in Aus) are verry hard to get,and when u do find them,they are extremely exp. The 25 on the other hand has parts readily available.

If i sell the 26, the cost of getting turbo/injectors/ecu for the 25 will be about the same with some left over to do the ex, lines for the turbo,piping etc.

Where as if i sell the 25, that would only cover half the cost of getting the steels for the 26 alone.

I will be adding a water/meth inj. kit no matter which set up i use, as our best brew is 95.

So here are the specifics:

Rb26dett--- Stock ecu / GT-SS equivalent / Water meth / Apexi pods / Cam gears / 3" Ex./ stock internals

Rb25det---- Pfc / GT30R -.63 / 555 inj / Water meth / Blitz pod / Cam gears / 3" Ex. / stock internals / stock ex. manifold

Now the important part..... I am aiming for a very responsive streeter as it is my daily driver, up to roughly 260-280rwkw.

Out of the two above combinations which will be the most responsive, and an overall better performer?

Thanks again.

Stock ECU = loose. Plus as you said, parts prices, forget the 26 IMO. Stock 26 ECU isn't bad, but really you dont want to use i.

Plus if you only want 260rwkw, GT-SS's are even too big for that, stock turbo's (with steel wheels) will do what you want there if you go that road

25 with a 3071, not the 3076.

Actually aiming for 280kw, but if i get 260kw,i'll live with that.

Unfortunately, no one to rebuild stock items with steel wheels here.

Still doing some reading up on the turbo chioces for the 25

When i had the 25 in, i read almost all the threads concerning these said turbos.........I guess i'll have to read them again. :D

nope Trust... as you say "I am aiming for a very responsive streeter as it is my daily driver" so go with the RB25... VCT, high comp and long plenum runners make it a much better street motor... if you were looking at higher power I would say go for the 26 but at for mid-high 200's Rb25 all the way... plus as ash said PFC is the way to go

Most likely i will be using a garrett item as there is an authorized dealer here, and i don't see many HKS / Greddy units unless it comes used through importers, which is verrry rear as the japs tend to keep this sort of gear.

To tell u the truth, i was bit disappointed when replaced the 25 with the 26 in terms of lag and response. The 25 using the 20 actuator had instant full boost(11psi) from as low as 2500rpm which made the car fun to drive,considering it has the weight of a bus!

With the target power of 280rwkw, i don't want to breaking traction too much though, because when her big a$$ starts sliding it kinda hard to bring back....yet ,response is the aim of the game :thumbsup:

Hasn't garrett brought out the GT3076r (GT30R) with a 52 trim comp yet?

Most likely i will be using a garrett item as there is an authorized dealer here, and i don't see many HKS / Greddy units unless it comes used through importers, which is verrry rear as the japs tend to keep this sort of gear.

To tell u the truth, i was bit disappointed when replaced the 25 with the 26 in terms of lag and response. The 25 using the 20 actuator had instant full boost(11psi) from as low as 2500rpm which made the car fun to drive,considering it has the weight of a bus!

With the target power of 280rwkw, i don't want to breaking traction too much though, because when her big a$$ starts sliding it kinda hard to bring back....yet ,response is the aim of the game :huh:

Hasn't garrett brought out the GT3076r (GT30R) with a 52 trim comp yet?

For what its worth, a guy in my area put a 56Trim GT30R on his 4WD Neo RB25 Stagea and is making 270awkw at 17psi with it and absolutely loves it. Its making 17psi by around 3700rpm and can lose all wheel traction giving it a boot full, by all accounts its a heap of fun for a bus.

You couldn't give me twin std posie bush bearing turbos or the RB26 to hang off them . Just BS work and money to pull the car apart and rebuild plain bearing turbos when they go cough - smoke screen . And they do .

I think sensible people rip bush turbos off and fit BB ones to keep them alive on RB26's .

The question you need to ask yourself is will the GT3076R'd RB25 come on boost before the RB26 will because if it does it will start hauling sooner .

Personally for drive it every day duties the hydraulic bucket 25 is easier and less costly to live with than a shim/mechanical RB26 . Also if the 3076R fell over you going to be up and running a lot sooner and for less money than the 26 if the glass turbos let go .

A .

The question you need to ask yourself is will the GT3076R'd RB25 come on boost before the RB26 will because if it does it will start hauling sooner . [

This is the question i need the answer for! :blush:

Geeze....can't seem to figure out how to use this quote function :)

Edited by smell
  • 2 months later...
When i had the 25 in, i read almost all the threads concerning these said turbos.........I guess i'll have to read them again. :(

Wwoooowwww..... Finally finished reading all those "Rb25 turbo upgrade" threads again!!!

So for the 260-280rwkw region i see the GT3071 is capable with an average of 20psi and the GT3076 with an average of 18psi

I am however leaning towards the genuine Gt3071 .82 as i have seen "skylinecouple" have good results with it although he might be the only one who tried this combo!???

On that note "skylinecouple" did you ever sort out the dump pipe issues, and do u have a dyno chart with boost against rpm???

I am very impressed also with the results of the GT2835pro S but alot of guys are not stating what size the turbine is, so its hard to make a conclusion.

"The Mafia" had some good results too with the GT3076 .63 but i think 300kw might be a little too much for me BUT..... if this set up is more responsive than "skylinecouple" GT3071 .82 i don't mind going in this direction either.

The GT3071 .63 is totally out of the question because even with the Garrett .63 housing i see there are issues with boost control.

So.... at the end of the day, is there anyone who have driven or seen any cars with these set ups peform???

I'm intrested mainly on response, and would really like to know the real world differences between the Gt3076 .63 and the Gt3071 .82 Garrett on a basically stock Rb25det.

Also is there anyone else who have tried this original Garrett Gt3071 .82 combo??? Pls share your experiences.

Dyno sheets appriciated :P

Ooooh... and it MUST be more responsive than a stock Rb26dett with 14psi, which by the way i think sucks..... 14psi by 3800rpm in 4th

if you have the 26 already installed, go gt3076 with a remapped std ecu, the gtr has a really nice std ecu and comes up killer with a remap. I'm nearly convinced the remap in a gtr is better than a afm PFC.

Nah, i'm gettin rid of the 26...... most likely :D

Parts are too hard to come by, and the price i could sell it for i would be able to get turbo/injectors/pfc/exhaust work etc. done for the 25det i already have taking up space in my garage.

The million dollar question though is will the 25 be more responsive and powerful than the stock 26 with one of the two above turbo choices...ie. Garrett Gt3071 .82 or Gt3076 .63

the answer to the million dollar question is yes

with a 3076 .82 rear my 25 made 309rwkw at 18psi and made the 18psi by about 3800rpm. the 3071 would be better again and make your powere requirement no worries

stock manifolds, poncams and a built engine, but it was lower compression ratio than stock so that would have hindered response rather than helped

Was your stock manifold power ported/extrude honed?

stock manifolds, poncams and a built engine, but it was lower compression ratio than stock so that would have hindered response rather than helped

Nice result but i will not be using any cams just an adj ex cam gear

May be it was because of the cams u got full boost so early???

Just concerned about boost control with the small back end (.63) on the Gt3076, but i feel it might make the 260-280rwkw a little more "safe" than running the Gt3071 .82 to it's limit...or close to anyway.

Response.... response.......response......

Oooooh.... found "skylinecouple" Dyno sheet ...... 18-19psi by 3800rpm Gt3071 .82 ......nice

I just f#@kin hate dyno sheets with kph and not rpm!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...