Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Lastnight I installed a cheapo 3" split dump pipe and front pipe (after a great deal of trouble getting the old rusted through bolted off the old dump). Anyway, on the drive home, besides my turbo sounding louder when spooling (attributed this to the new stainless steel piping), I noticed it is now boosting to .6/.7 bar as opposed to the .5 it was at before. I thought this is probably just a side effect of freeing up space in the dump/front pipe as it's not unheard of to gain a pound or so worth of pressure after doing this modification. Thing is, it would boost fine to this in 1st and 2nd gear, but then in 3rd gear the turbo would start to spool but it would not create any boost...just lagged its way from 60km/h to 80km/h. It's almost as if the ECU was kicking in with a boost cut?

Now here's the prime suspect, and I want to ask this before I go pulling the dump pipe off cause it's an absolute shit to get off. As it is a split dump pipe there is a removable divider between the wastegate pipe and the dump pipe, which I noticed wasn't sitting completely straight after being tightened by me, almost overlapping a bit on one of the pipes...but not enough that I thought it would bother anything. See the picture below of this divider.

9ulrls.jpg

Is it possible this divider is jamming the wastegate shut, creating enough boost for the ECU to kick in and say that's enough? My car had no problems at all before installing this pipe...I can only attribute it to this?

Any ideas?

Cheers.

Cheers guys, good idea...saves me pulling the dump off if that's not the problem (though in some way it has to be cause there's nothing else I've done to the engine).

Well the wastegate was getting jammed by the divider...

I removed the dump and installed it without the divider in place. Wastegate flap was now moving freely by hand so I reconnected the actuator. ECU didn't seem to be cutting in as bad as it was before but the thing is still overboosting and I feel some hesitation if it gets to .6 or .7 bar. I'm going to pull off the actuator this arvo when the engine is cool and see if the flap has gotten jammed up again. If it has I'm putting the stock dump back on, cause it's a pain in the ass having to use half throttle for the sake of making sure the thing only reaches .5 bar. Is this something that bypassing the ECU boost cut might fix? What pressure is the factory cut set at?

Why did I let slide on my number one automotive rule? You get what you pay for!

Thing is, the standard dump pipe doesn't have this divider (although it doesn't have a split pipe either). And the same problem seems to be occuring with or without the divider, just to a lesser extent without it. Engine should be cold now...I'll go check the wastegate flap for interference.

I deserve everything I get? I usually avoid sarcasm like the plague but that's a terrific contribution to a help wanted thread. I've bought plenty of items off eBay for my cars without issue. I avoid critically engineered items - it's not like I've gone and bought a copy turbo expecting total reliability. The assumption is that exhaust piping is a pretty safe bet, with the worst that can happen being wastegate issues or a shitty sound. Besides, the front pipe is/sounds fantastic and together with the dump pipe it cost half that of a Jap powerhouse branded front pipe...so I will have no regrets even if I resort back to the standard dump.

I had the same dump pipe on my old R33 and it didnt have any problems

you could probably try grinding the divider down a bit and see if it will clear the wastegate

sounded like it wasn't completely jammed, like its probably just slightly in the way where the wastegate was touching it when its warmed up and expanded

I removed the divider though, and still have a couple of issues. Think I'm just gonna switch to the stock dump and see how that matches up with the front pipe. Not worth the hassle of wondering if there's something wrong with my car :D

I think you have a good point about it being warmed up and causing it, as I've noticed it doesn't give me any trouble when the car is cold. And I pulled off the actuator arm when cold...flap was opening very freely, no jams.

Had the same dump on my car for years, had a bit of cleaning up to do on it and re welded all the welds just to make sure no cracks would form. worked well on a standard turbo, got rid of it when i put a high flow on.

Not likely too be an issue but you should also consider thermal expansion of the different components in that area.

Ie you would have to be unlucky, but it may be that when all is cold there is clearance and the flapper clears the divider but when engine is running and the flapper opens up it gets heated by the exhaust gas flowing past it and it expands to the point that it catches on the divider as it trys to close...Once again not likely to be that close but you never know...stranger things have happened

For this type of issue "die grinder is your best friend"...

bought one of these dump pipes awhile ago and it blocked my wastegate from opening at all, boost would just climb up & up. Problem was resolved by grinding down the side of that divider and also cleaning up the wastegate pipe entry. Just poor quality control when theyre manufactured

Thanks guys, I'm gonna give that a shot. I'll just put the stock dump back on for now and while the aftermarket is off, give it a birthday with the old die grinder :D

It is indeed poor quality, I expected nothing more for so cheap...but like I said...you get what you pay for lol.

RB2530, I won't rule out your theory because the difference between the flap being able to open and shut was the difference in the position of the dump pipe on its mounting bolts. I quite literally held it in place and put the bolts on so it wouldn't move out of position to allow for free movement of the flap. So it's more than possible thermal expansion is responsible!

Speak to Andrew at AM Performance, he'll build you a nice 3" stainless split dump/front pipe. He also makes 200 cell hi flow cats :)

I took this advice from the SA section of SAU and couldn't be happier with his products.

Andrew - 0401865373

Cheers! Do you know how much he charges for a 3 inch split? Doesn't have to be split I just want the extra room from a 3".

I tried putting the stock dump back on but then the rest of my exhaust system wouldn't bolt up straight. I'd need a flexijoint to do it. So I cracked the shits with it and took to the aftermarket dump with a die grinder...made plenty of clearance for the flap to swing past the bottom of the wastegate pipe freely, as this is what was making it sticky. So the flap is now moving freely.

But after reconnecting everything and driving again it still gives me trouble. I've now concluded that sticky wastegate flap isn't the problem, wastegate flap clearance is. It's not that the wastegate flap is getting stuck on something, it's just not opening to its full 90 degree potential. Basically, at mid-high rpm (and with full throttle) there is so much exhaust gas flow, that for the wastegate flap to relieve boost it needs to be able to open a full 90 degrees and no less. It's only getting about 70 degrees with the aftermarket dump. So it's the side of the wasegate pipe that needs to be ground down, not the bottom. Only problem with that is...there won't be much more metal left before I start breaching the welds on the pipe. Gonna keep grinding...just a shame my stock dump won't go back on because of the new system, so if I go too far I won't really be able to drive the car.

Sometimes I just want to leave these things to the pros lol.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...