Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

short of writing the facts down on a wooden stake and literally bashing them into your heads with a hammer, I don't think that there is any other way that Gary is going to be able to get the facts into some of your very thick skulls :D

One thing that I really did learn from this thread is how much of a dead set idiot you are.

Are you sure you don't drive a Holden Commodore with a Southern Cross sticker in the back while you wear a straight edged brim hat tilted slightly to the side?

Besides proving my point by being an idiot, what is it that you are trying to achieve by posting the replies you're doing in the thread?

One thing that I really did learn from this thread is how much of a dead set idiot you are.

Are you sure you don't drive a Holden Commodore with a Southern Cross sticker in the back while you wear a straight edged brim hat tilted slightly to the side?

Besides proving my point by being an idiot, what is it that you are trying to achieve by posting the replies you're doing in the thread?

I don't think he even understands the concepts being discussed. Trolling is about all there is to it.

Judging by your off topic replies, once of which is a feeble attempt at a personal attack ([200] that is one of the most pathetic insults I've ever read on SAU), it is in fact the two of you, who are trolling.

I'm merely saying that some people should re read the facts which have been reiterated again and again in the previous 40 odd pages, but are seemingly immune to changing their POV on a particular subject.

I was expecting a reply something along those lines, absolutely pathetic.

Maybe one day you will achieve something in your life and your parents will no longer regret that you weren't just a cum stain on the bed sheets.

LOL.

well once the trolls and continual nay sayers accept the fact that a 13B actually flows 3.9L and revs to 3000RPM before the eccentric shaft, then the thread is finished! until then the debate continues!

What you call fact I say subjective opinion...the length of this thread is evidence of that. But really, shut up man. The debate finished a long time ago...we all got sick of it, even the most argumentative of us. You had your chance for input back then, of which I didn't see much besides you saying who is right and who is wrong. Why try to reignite the fire when the thread is long enough as is? It sure sounds like trolling to me.

well once the trolls and continual nay sayers accept the fact that a 13B actually flows 3.9L and revs to 3000RPM before the eccentric shaft, then the thread is finished! until then the debate continues!

Rotor spins at 3000RPM = Yes, no body argues that and was settled a very long time ago.

Flows 3.9 litres...? = It sucks and spits out 3.9l every revolution of the rotory but only spits out 1.3l every combustion cycle

well once the trolls and continual nay sayers accept the fact that a 13B actually flows 3.9L and revs to 3000RPM before the eccentric shaft, then the thread is finished! until then the debate continues!

I'll ignore the fact that there are mistakes and say yes, but that is but part of the story. A part which conveniently sets out to discredit the rotary (which is already incredibly flawed anyway).

Everything is relevant to time, everything. The position above totally ignores the time equalising crank/e-shaft and the notion of relative.

This is as smart as quoting torque and not power. Or assuming house prices rise indefinitely because they are high now. Assuming your car is full of petrol so it doesn't need any more again. That not being hungry now means you are okay forever.

Ignoring the arguments of displacement and capacity, the above position ignores time and relatives and doesn't get close to describing how the engine works at a critical point - output. Therefore any conclusions drawn from it are flawed.

It is you who needs to read the thread and understand it.

I have read this entire thread, start to finish, and gary's logic makes more sense than any of yours. To me the simplest way of putting it is that: if a rotary engine does not in fact flow such large amounts of air, then how on earth can they spool such big turbos with ease?

There are 4 seasons to a year, the earth revolves around the sun, humans are mammals, rotaries: revolve 3000rpm, pump out 3.9litres and are 2 stroke. These are all facts. Accept it.

There is nothing magical about a rotary. It does not use any state of the art alien technology. It's combustion technique is unique but by no means state of the art. The fuel it uses is just normal fuel, not any special nuclear fuels. So why in the hell can it produce that much power and use that much fuel if it only pumps 1.3litres? How can it spin a massive T01000000 turbo charger with just 1.3 litres? Use your common sense and logical reasoning people!!!

Mr Skyline Man - i will repost something just for you.

Let’s sum this up in a simple chart to visually explain how this works:

2 stroke engine (up, down) – 1 complete crankshaft revolution.

4 stroke engine (up, down, up, down) – 2 complete crankshaft revolutions.

6 stroke (rotary) engine (up, down, up, down, up, down) – 3 complete crankshaft (eccentric shaft) revolutions.

If its a 2 stroke engine then it only expells 1.3l. If its a 3.9l then its a 6 stroke. So one theory will cancel out the other, its either 2 stroke 1.3l or a 3.9l 6 stroke. As it is quite obvious that its not logical for it to be a 6 stroke and its perfectly plausable to be a 2 stroke then it has to be a 1.3l. If you want to look at it from the rotor's perspective rather than the e-shaft then you need to think of one rotor being one piston that is able to produce 3 operations at once and able to complete three combustion cylces in one rotor revolution.

Don't waste your time guys, you're only posting information that's already in this thread. And they're only asking questions that have already been asked in this thread. All this does is add to the length of it. It doesn't help that they have read the thread something like this:

utter crap

utter crap

utter crap

utter crap

GARY'S POST

utter crap

utter crap

utter crap

GARY's POST

utter crap

utter crap

I have read this entire thread, start to finish, and gary's logic makes more sense than any of yours. To me the simplest way of putting it is that: if a rotary engine does not in fact flow such large amounts of air, then how on earth can they spool such big turbos with ease?

Mate, there is no 'logic'. There is fact and there is not.

What is your definition of large? It is a totally subject term! The same size as a 2.6L piston engines in a similar fashion? For a 13B? Yes, exactly. Albeit (only) slightly better due to heat. RB26 single turbos can be basically applied to 13Bs. Think T04Z, T51R (extreme) or GT35R!

Many people are still ignoring relatives and time equilisers and only ending up confused (yet arguing based on it LOL).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Haha I do that.. thats when it chirps..The bit point for me is almost non-existent. Otherwise I stall it. But yes, in terms of performance, the clutch is solid af.
    • Greg speaks wisdom. These dirty old Datsuns are only value when they are cheap. When they are not cheap, there is no value. Sounds contradictory, but it's true. We are now 20 years past the hey day of modifying cheap 90s JDM cars for small amounts of money. This is a different world. If you are rich and can afford not to care about what is effectively wasting money on an old Datto shitter, then I have no reason to argue against it. But if you are wanting to experience what we all experienced back in 2005 (and I bought my car last century!) then there is no way to do it.
    • Short answer: No. Medium answer: No, because you still need to conjure the things out of thin air to bolt them to a NA to make it a NA+T. Long Answer: No - The things you need to conjure - meaning a turbo, intercooling, manifolds, exhaust, intake/manifold/piping, clutch, injectors, fuel pump, AFM (?), ECU + Wiring (woo, N/A loom fun) have to come from somewhere. You could have many scavenged these things from an OEM car that someone had upgraded from and use some of these. This will be cost prohibitive now, especially so in the USA. You'd probably pay the same for newer, upgraded components that are better than old OEM stuff from 25-30 years ago. None of these big ticket items are re-usable for the N/A car. Why not buy new and upgrade while you're there? The only real consideration is turbo and fuel sizing and determining whether you want to stay within the bounds of the OEM engine or get into rebuild territory. These limits ARE lower with a N/A motor and especially N/A gearbox at the starting point. And if you're gonna upgrade those then you may as well consider having them built to begin with. Because everyone here knows you're never far from that next engine rebuild once you start making the power you want... The cars you see on the internet and SAU etc have been built over decades. If you're really clued in... you would sell your US car to somebody for what you paid for it. You would then scour AU JDM pages or SAU and buy a car like Dose's on this forum with your powerful American Dollar. This will save you so much money in the long term. Importing it could be tricky. Or it might not because USA. I have long said the only reason 90's Japanese stuff took off was because a) Japanese people had Japanese cars so that is what they used b) Australians could import these cars to Australia with very minimal changes and use them on the road here c) Neither country had well-priced access to US or EU Sports Cars. I don't believe the JDM scene would have taken off in Australia at all if we had EU priced EU BMW M offerings, or more especially the AUS V8 Scene would never have existed if we had the multitude of US cars like Camaros, Mustangs, Corvettes at the prices you folks do. After all - Do the math. I would say put a V8 in your R34 and that's the smart way forward. It is. I did it. I know this from my own experience. But at that point there's no reason to simply not buy a C5 or C6? It would be simpler and easier and cheaper and bette-
    • Reading all this... hurts lol. I have an ENR34 5MT and I paid an inflated USA price for the car alone, had to do tons of preventative maintenance past that, and so I'm over $30K USD into the car already and haven't even touched power.  I wanted to +t it. Not even trying to make GTR numbers, I'd be happy with 250hp.  Can I get away with paying much less to make that happen?
    • Damn you’ve done well, definitely snapping necks.
×
×
  • Create New...