Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

short of writing the facts down on a wooden stake and literally bashing them into your heads with a hammer, I don't think that there is any other way that Gary is going to be able to get the facts into some of your very thick skulls :D

One thing that I really did learn from this thread is how much of a dead set idiot you are.

Are you sure you don't drive a Holden Commodore with a Southern Cross sticker in the back while you wear a straight edged brim hat tilted slightly to the side?

Besides proving my point by being an idiot, what is it that you are trying to achieve by posting the replies you're doing in the thread?

One thing that I really did learn from this thread is how much of a dead set idiot you are.

Are you sure you don't drive a Holden Commodore with a Southern Cross sticker in the back while you wear a straight edged brim hat tilted slightly to the side?

Besides proving my point by being an idiot, what is it that you are trying to achieve by posting the replies you're doing in the thread?

I don't think he even understands the concepts being discussed. Trolling is about all there is to it.

Judging by your off topic replies, once of which is a feeble attempt at a personal attack ([200] that is one of the most pathetic insults I've ever read on SAU), it is in fact the two of you, who are trolling.

I'm merely saying that some people should re read the facts which have been reiterated again and again in the previous 40 odd pages, but are seemingly immune to changing their POV on a particular subject.

I was expecting a reply something along those lines, absolutely pathetic.

Maybe one day you will achieve something in your life and your parents will no longer regret that you weren't just a cum stain on the bed sheets.

LOL.

well once the trolls and continual nay sayers accept the fact that a 13B actually flows 3.9L and revs to 3000RPM before the eccentric shaft, then the thread is finished! until then the debate continues!

What you call fact I say subjective opinion...the length of this thread is evidence of that. But really, shut up man. The debate finished a long time ago...we all got sick of it, even the most argumentative of us. You had your chance for input back then, of which I didn't see much besides you saying who is right and who is wrong. Why try to reignite the fire when the thread is long enough as is? It sure sounds like trolling to me.

well once the trolls and continual nay sayers accept the fact that a 13B actually flows 3.9L and revs to 3000RPM before the eccentric shaft, then the thread is finished! until then the debate continues!

Rotor spins at 3000RPM = Yes, no body argues that and was settled a very long time ago.

Flows 3.9 litres...? = It sucks and spits out 3.9l every revolution of the rotory but only spits out 1.3l every combustion cycle

well once the trolls and continual nay sayers accept the fact that a 13B actually flows 3.9L and revs to 3000RPM before the eccentric shaft, then the thread is finished! until then the debate continues!

I'll ignore the fact that there are mistakes and say yes, but that is but part of the story. A part which conveniently sets out to discredit the rotary (which is already incredibly flawed anyway).

Everything is relevant to time, everything. The position above totally ignores the time equalising crank/e-shaft and the notion of relative.

This is as smart as quoting torque and not power. Or assuming house prices rise indefinitely because they are high now. Assuming your car is full of petrol so it doesn't need any more again. That not being hungry now means you are okay forever.

Ignoring the arguments of displacement and capacity, the above position ignores time and relatives and doesn't get close to describing how the engine works at a critical point - output. Therefore any conclusions drawn from it are flawed.

It is you who needs to read the thread and understand it.

I have read this entire thread, start to finish, and gary's logic makes more sense than any of yours. To me the simplest way of putting it is that: if a rotary engine does not in fact flow such large amounts of air, then how on earth can they spool such big turbos with ease?

There are 4 seasons to a year, the earth revolves around the sun, humans are mammals, rotaries: revolve 3000rpm, pump out 3.9litres and are 2 stroke. These are all facts. Accept it.

There is nothing magical about a rotary. It does not use any state of the art alien technology. It's combustion technique is unique but by no means state of the art. The fuel it uses is just normal fuel, not any special nuclear fuels. So why in the hell can it produce that much power and use that much fuel if it only pumps 1.3litres? How can it spin a massive T01000000 turbo charger with just 1.3 litres? Use your common sense and logical reasoning people!!!

Mr Skyline Man - i will repost something just for you.

Let’s sum this up in a simple chart to visually explain how this works:

2 stroke engine (up, down) – 1 complete crankshaft revolution.

4 stroke engine (up, down, up, down) – 2 complete crankshaft revolutions.

6 stroke (rotary) engine (up, down, up, down, up, down) – 3 complete crankshaft (eccentric shaft) revolutions.

If its a 2 stroke engine then it only expells 1.3l. If its a 3.9l then its a 6 stroke. So one theory will cancel out the other, its either 2 stroke 1.3l or a 3.9l 6 stroke. As it is quite obvious that its not logical for it to be a 6 stroke and its perfectly plausable to be a 2 stroke then it has to be a 1.3l. If you want to look at it from the rotor's perspective rather than the e-shaft then you need to think of one rotor being one piston that is able to produce 3 operations at once and able to complete three combustion cylces in one rotor revolution.

Don't waste your time guys, you're only posting information that's already in this thread. And they're only asking questions that have already been asked in this thread. All this does is add to the length of it. It doesn't help that they have read the thread something like this:

utter crap

utter crap

utter crap

utter crap

GARY'S POST

utter crap

utter crap

utter crap

GARY's POST

utter crap

utter crap

I have read this entire thread, start to finish, and gary's logic makes more sense than any of yours. To me the simplest way of putting it is that: if a rotary engine does not in fact flow such large amounts of air, then how on earth can they spool such big turbos with ease?

Mate, there is no 'logic'. There is fact and there is not.

What is your definition of large? It is a totally subject term! The same size as a 2.6L piston engines in a similar fashion? For a 13B? Yes, exactly. Albeit (only) slightly better due to heat. RB26 single turbos can be basically applied to 13Bs. Think T04Z, T51R (extreme) or GT35R!

Many people are still ignoring relatives and time equilisers and only ending up confused (yet arguing based on it LOL).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep that is correct. It allows you to adjust the short throw range from what I can tell
    • Car has been running great, I've put about 300km's of break in time on it. First thing that stands out with properly sealing rings is no more noticeable crankcase smell coming out of my catch can. This may seem insignificant, but the constant smell while driving around was infuriating. It's also nice to see my oil level remain stable. Two new issues have developed that I only noticed this weekend though. There's a very noticeable driveline vibration past 100kmh. I only noticed it now as I've been babying it under 100kmh in the backroads. This comes as no surprise as I'm running a one-piece shaft, and I paid zero attention to my driveshaft angle when I put everything back in. I also have a fair bit of voltage drop on hot starts. The starter audibly is forcing. No issues on cold start though. I must not have removed all the paint under my main block ground during assembly. I'll try and take care of both those issues this week once the kids are asleep.  I also received all the parts I was missing for my direct port setup. I will hopefully have pictures of that up soon. I'm hoping to get back on the dyno the week of June 30th as I'll be on vacation. I'm confident I should be able to make north of 500rwkw on pump gas and WMI. I'll go back again later this summer with E98, but I want to confirm my ethanol content sensor is working properly first. I've never seen it read anything but 11%. This makes sense for our 10% ethanol content pump gas here, but I would expect the occasional movement between fill ups. 
    • 75% complete. Will now need to get a new axle with 5x114.3 hubs and then figure out how to customize some mudguards for it once the wheels are on.
    • Trailer prep is underway... Lined up the wheel to get a rough indication of how it would sit Then removed all the bits (as far as possible) and gave the frame a light sand and quick lick of paint   Then added some carpet
    • okay, so I figured this out, removed needles and reinstalled after swapping the gauge face on my triple gauge for my ER34, all work and look good. I tried to do the same for the main cluster, but the main cluster gauge faces are dished, the replacement gauge face are flat, so due to the dish in the org face ,mounting backing plate (clear) and depth of the needle, the flat gauge face will not work. I notice that R34 gtr gauges are flat, appears to be different clear backing plate that aren't dished. are these available, or what have others done to install flat gauge faces?
×
×
  • Create New...