Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey i was wondering if anyone has made a custom air feed for the standard airbox? I got a front mount where the piping goes around to the front near the radiator and the standard air guide does not fit. Any suggestions would be great. Car is an r33 gts-t by the way.

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/292024-custom-air-feed-to-standard-airbox/
Share on other sites

most people just trim a bit of the snorkel so it clears the piping

problem with the 33's is the top half of the box is the air feed, so you need to tap into that to be able to run a custom CAI on the std box.

Check out the Custom Fibreglass Enclosed Airbox And Snorkel For Gt-t, Ghetto Gruppe M thread in this section (http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Custom-Fibreglass-Enclose-t261635.html).

It has a few ideas in there. Any fabrication work you end up doing might not actually improve much over the standard snorkle if you're restricted by room. The standard snorkle is actually pretty restrictive. You may be better off spending a little money on getting the I/C piping to return to stock I/C piping locations. You can then do a snorkle mod and get more beneift from it do to the extra room and less restriction.

Thanks for the ideas guys. Only reason i want to keep the standard airbox is because my car will have close to 300kw and i do not want a cop to even think about sending me to a epa test. So i really cant go with a custom box as it will arouse some sort of suspision, i was also thinking or re-routing the intercooler pipe to go over the top of the engine to use the standard air guide and to do a home job of porting it myself to make it as wide as possible.

Craved, yea i know its a problem that the air must enter from the top of the airbox, would be so much easier if you could just go in from the bottom. Ill try to speak to my mechanic and see if he has any ideas.

If you don't want any suspicion from the police then don't wash it much/paint your car silver and don't make it stand out :P

I haven't installed my custom snorkle/airbox lid yet as I still a few things to change. But I have increased the size of the inlet to the lid and internal cross section of the snorkle. If you make your piping run behind/underneath your I/C and back to the standard piping it is going to stand out much less than any non-standard looknig piping running over the engine. You can then use a larger custom snorkle etc to cover some other things slightly it you're concerned.

If my setup doesn't provide a great gain then I still have the option of changing the lower section. In standard form the AFM is set quite a long way into the box. This blocks off a lot of potential area of the filter. Mounting it further back will free up this filter area. The inlet pipe will need to be altered also so it would take a bit of stuffing around. This would only be needed though if there is no major drop off in boost/power high in the rev range. If it doesn't drop off then it should mean it's flowing well enough not to be an issue.

Pictures%20from%20upstairs%20236.jpg

http://plazmaman.com/shop/index.php?action...m&itemId=13

I inquired a while ago and they were willing to just sell the pipe from the tb to the inner gaurd, i ended up buying a blitz return flow fmic instead.

  • 1 month later...
does that actually work ?

It would work if you have a filter on the end of the pipe and you are not using the standard piping set up going through the gaurds, the same set up used with fmic's to avoid cutting holes in your inner gaurd to route the piping over the engine.

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Doesn't the R31 have the filter below the afm? maby someone could make it fit the R33. then could use that hole from the factory cooler pipe as a cai, while still looking stock.

negative, same set up as a 33

Fit a pod on the air intake pipe inside the stock airbox, then cut a hole in the airbox and run some piping from the airbox to somewhere down the front. It's cheap to do and retains that factory look if you don't look too hard.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...