Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey i was wondering if anyone has made a custom air feed for the standard airbox? I got a front mount where the piping goes around to the front near the radiator and the standard air guide does not fit. Any suggestions would be great. Car is an r33 gts-t by the way.

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/292024-custom-air-feed-to-standard-airbox/
Share on other sites

most people just trim a bit of the snorkel so it clears the piping

problem with the 33's is the top half of the box is the air feed, so you need to tap into that to be able to run a custom CAI on the std box.

Check out the Custom Fibreglass Enclosed Airbox And Snorkel For Gt-t, Ghetto Gruppe M thread in this section (http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Custom-Fibreglass-Enclose-t261635.html).

It has a few ideas in there. Any fabrication work you end up doing might not actually improve much over the standard snorkle if you're restricted by room. The standard snorkle is actually pretty restrictive. You may be better off spending a little money on getting the I/C piping to return to stock I/C piping locations. You can then do a snorkle mod and get more beneift from it do to the extra room and less restriction.

Thanks for the ideas guys. Only reason i want to keep the standard airbox is because my car will have close to 300kw and i do not want a cop to even think about sending me to a epa test. So i really cant go with a custom box as it will arouse some sort of suspision, i was also thinking or re-routing the intercooler pipe to go over the top of the engine to use the standard air guide and to do a home job of porting it myself to make it as wide as possible.

Craved, yea i know its a problem that the air must enter from the top of the airbox, would be so much easier if you could just go in from the bottom. Ill try to speak to my mechanic and see if he has any ideas.

If you don't want any suspicion from the police then don't wash it much/paint your car silver and don't make it stand out :P

I haven't installed my custom snorkle/airbox lid yet as I still a few things to change. But I have increased the size of the inlet to the lid and internal cross section of the snorkle. If you make your piping run behind/underneath your I/C and back to the standard piping it is going to stand out much less than any non-standard looknig piping running over the engine. You can then use a larger custom snorkle etc to cover some other things slightly it you're concerned.

If my setup doesn't provide a great gain then I still have the option of changing the lower section. In standard form the AFM is set quite a long way into the box. This blocks off a lot of potential area of the filter. Mounting it further back will free up this filter area. The inlet pipe will need to be altered also so it would take a bit of stuffing around. This would only be needed though if there is no major drop off in boost/power high in the rev range. If it doesn't drop off then it should mean it's flowing well enough not to be an issue.

Pictures%20from%20upstairs%20236.jpg

http://plazmaman.com/shop/index.php?action...m&itemId=13

I inquired a while ago and they were willing to just sell the pipe from the tb to the inner gaurd, i ended up buying a blitz return flow fmic instead.

  • 1 month later...
does that actually work ?

It would work if you have a filter on the end of the pipe and you are not using the standard piping set up going through the gaurds, the same set up used with fmic's to avoid cutting holes in your inner gaurd to route the piping over the engine.

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Doesn't the R31 have the filter below the afm? maby someone could make it fit the R33. then could use that hole from the factory cooler pipe as a cai, while still looking stock.

negative, same set up as a 33

Fit a pod on the air intake pipe inside the stock airbox, then cut a hole in the airbox and run some piping from the airbox to somewhere down the front. It's cheap to do and retains that factory look if you don't look too hard.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...