Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have offered my tunning services to a good friend of mine, however I am not getting the results expected. Unfortunately the engine was not built very well, was returned for warranty rebuild once and has had many problems since. The car previously has the same HKS GT2835 turbo and made 200rwkw. It also made the same power with a RB25 turbo. I attemped to gain some more power by increasing the boost on the previous RB20 and it resulted in minimal improvement. So the choice to install the RB25/30 was chosen.

Specs are:

RB25 Head

Rb20 Cams

RB30 Block

Unknown comp forged pistons

HKS GT2835

STD manifold

3" exhaust

Trust turn flow FMIC

RB26 Apexi PFC

RB20 loom

So my experience so far is.

-RB26 PFC is used on the RB20 loom and rewired to suit. I have corrected the Airflow correction and curve as the 'Shop' decided to just change the airflow correction to 50% as the GTR expects two air flow meters inputs. The output from the single VG30 AFM has been bridged into the PFC which is fine, However I modified the Air Flow Curve to actually represent the amount of air entering the engine as I like the A/F ratio on my Datalogit to reflect what it is in relality. So now the Air Flow correction is back to 100%. I have rescalled the Maps to 400-8000rpm instead of 800-9200rpm(GTR). Injectors are std RB25. Fuel pressure has be raised to emulate an output of ~444cc so injector correction remains at 100%. Injector lag has been changed to 0.04ms (diff between std GTR and RB25 injectors).

-Tuning the AFR was resonably straight forward and 11.8-12.0AFR was acheived at full load and 14.7AFR at cruise. 0 boost was 13.0AFR so no reason for concern there. The car was experiencing missing, so I pulled the plugs to find they were gapped to .4mm.. I regaped them to .75mm. No change in missing as expected or felt. I have ordered some NGK PFR7A plugs but have not installed as yet.

I was able to tune out the miss with AFR's richer than 10.8....The car will not be tuned to this as there is obviously a problem.

-Timing was adjusted however there was a rythmic rattle heard when accelarting in 3rd or 4th for long periods. The noise does not show up with knock. Response is amazing with 1 bar @ 2900rpm and 1.3bar @ 3100rpm. Power is way down on what I would expect however with this turbo. Similar power can be made with half the boost(inicating at restriction). It has adjustable cam gears so I checked the timing in regards to TDC. I found the inlet cam retarded 10 degrees(crank) and the exhaust advanced 5 degrees. I have dialed them in as best I can so would hope them to be much closer than previous. The car ran almost with no noticeable difference after adjustment, maybe alittle more response. The car still hesistates and misses, is low on power and drops off quickly after 6000rpm.

-I have blanked off the BOV to see if it was leaking but this is not the case.

-I haven't checked but am planning on.

-Exhaust/Cat for restriction

-Intercooler for restriction

-Injectors for even flow

-RB20 Resistor box(is in the engine bay) have to check connectivity and suitablilty with the RB25 high Impedance injectors

-turbo compressor condition, check GCG rebuild specs.

-compression test

-RB20 Camshaft suitabilty

Any help, thoughts and guidance would be valued. I don't want this one to beat me.

Matt

My first guess - and I'm no expert - would be that a 3L engine wouldn't breath too well through RB20 cams, in standard form, let alone with a huge turbo pumping stuff in. Lift is only 7.8mm (GT-R is 8.3mm lift). Both are a 240 duration (In & Ex).

And which RB20 cams (DE, DET)?

Also, the specs for the RB20 and RB25 cams are different:

. In Open In Close Lobe Centre Ex Open Ex Close Lobe Centre O/Lap LSA

RB20DET 5 BTDC 55ABDC 115 60BBDC TDC 120 5 117.5

RB25DET TDC 60ABDC 120 57BBDC 3ATDC 117 3 118.5

Maybe a set of adjustable cam gears might help.

RB20s don't run a resistor pack on the injectors. (although I recognise that it might be needed for the PFC to not poo its drivers)

My first guess - and I'm no expert - would be that a 3L engine wouldn't breath too well through RB20 cams, in standard form, let alone with a huge turbo pumping stuff in. Lift is only 7.8mm (GT-R is 8.3mm lift). Both are a 240 duration (In & Ex).

And which RB20 cams (DE, DET)?

Also, the specs for the RB20 and RB25 cams are different:

. In Open In Close Lobe Centre Ex Open Ex Close Lobe Centre O/Lap LSA

RB20DET 5 BTDC 55ABDC 115 60BBDC TDC 120 5 117.5

RB25DET TDC 60ABDC 120 57BBDC 3ATDC 117 3 118.5

Maybe a set of adjustable cam gears might help.

RB20s don't run a resistor pack on the injectors. (although I recognise that it might be needed for the PFC to not poo its drivers)

I was told they where DET cams, but will check as the DE have less duration(232 inlet) and lift(7.3). I have tried changing the lobe center on the cams to mimic rb25 cams closer but it made minimal difference. It has adj cam gears which I used to correct the initial cam to crank/TDC alighnment issue.

So the resistor pack I saw must be unrelated... If the PFC is expecting low impedence injectors and you connect high impedence RB25 injectors I would not expect it to cause an issue as the output current required to operate the injectors would be less. I will still have a look however..

Thanks for your thoughts, keep them coming

Edited by BoostdR
dont waste your coin on those platnium plugs either. BKR7E do the job just fine.

It had 6's in it. They were NGK R with the split earth strap and V groove electrode. I'm not a fan. The owner of the car also wanted plugs that have a longer life span.

I myself don't mind the extra labour and use the cheap ones.

No graph as yet. All road tunning at this stage. I may be able to get you a graph using Copilot software.

Cheers.

The car had uprated springs fitted, so most likely not the issue.

Thanks for the idea, however much appreciated.

Edited by BoostdR

update.

Did some more investigation after work tonight. Found the car picked up ~50rwkw with no missing with no changes. The weather here is 16 degrees. I tuned the car to the point it would step out in second so was happy at the improvement. Some 7 degrees were added to the map. What has got me re thinking the problem is after we sat on the side of the road for 5min to up load some data(after a few runs) and relieve me of feeling sea sick the car again felt very lifeless and lost the previously found power. Heat soak is my first thought. I'm going to look at the ignitor, CAS, Camshaft CAS drive keyway next. I think disregard looking at the

exhaust,

intercooler,

camshaft duration and lift

Resistor box (doesn't have one for the injectors)

Turbo compressor

My first point of call will be checking the ignition timing with my light when the engine is cold and hot. I will also check the voltage at the ignitor at both temps. Thirdly, check the adjustable cam wheels haven't move.

here's to hoping

cheers

Doesn't the GT-R run an inlet air temperature sensor? The others don't. Maybe lack of sensor is causing problems for the PFC.

And do you have real cold air induction (not running un-shielded pods)?

Doesn't the GT-R run an inlet air temperature sensor? The others don't. Maybe lack of sensor is causing problems for the PFC.

And do you have real cold air induction (not running un-shielded pods)?

Yes the GTR runs a Air temp. It has been bridged to the water temp sensor from what I can see. Both read the same temp. I must say water temp seems very low, sitting between 55-62 degrees.

It does have an airbox with cold air induction.

So the PFC thinks that the air going into the inlet plenum is the same temperature as the coolant. I don't think so!

Yes thats exactly correct. I have adjusted the ign and fuel air temp correction to negate this. Maybe worth my while picking a an air temp sensor and wiring it in. Some thing is fishy which the low temp coolant reading it is giving me however. Maybe the fact the inputs are bridged/parallel, the overall circuit resistance changed and has skewed the value....or the rb26 coolant temp sensor works on a different resistence to the rb20. Never the less it is not the cause of the engines troubles from what I can see.

Edited by BoostdR

R32, R33 and R34 all run different temperature senders for the dash and ECU... Becareful.

Also, you have the readings in parallel, this will most likely cause issues, as the ECU is reading the resitance of it, by varying voltage...

R32, R33 and R34 all run different temperature senders for the dash and ECU... Becareful.

Also, you have the readings in parallel, this will most likely cause issues, as the ECU is reading the resitance of it, by varying voltage...

Agreed,

Will split them up.

Edited by BoostdR

You can't just copgyback another signal off the factory water temp sender, as it works off resistance which is being influenced by the addition of another sensor.

My car ran like a cop when I tried to wire up my old water temp gauge off the factory sender. As soon as I removed it, problem solved and it was running as normal.

Definitely get an air temp sensor ASAP and DONT run the car with both signals from the water temp sensor.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even with the piston at TDC there was room for it to drop, but I don't think it can drop fully into the cylinder, the problem you have is that you need something pushing against the valve to hold it up so you have enough room to put the new stem seal on and the spring etc.  I used compressed air only because putting rope in the cylinder seemed a bit risky to me, I know people have done it countless times before like this. Overall it's a pain in the ass job. Honestly you'd probably be better off taking the head off because the risk of dropping something in the engine and the finicky-ness of it all is very stressful. If you are going to attempt it though i 10000% recommend a 36050 valve spring/keeper tool. I had both the traditional lever type and after doing 1 cylinder it was absolute pain to get those valve keepers in place, even with 2 people. That 36050 is amazing, you do have to push hard to get them in place but it works perfectly almost every time. Back to my actual issue I think my engine is just tired and old and the rings have gone bad. The comp numbers (cold, no oil) were: Cyl 1 -129psi Cyl 2 - 133psi Cyl 3 - 138psi Cyl 4 - 137psi Cyl 5 - 157psi Cyl 6 - 142psi   Cylinder 5 and 6 having the most carbon on them.
    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
×
×
  • Create New...