Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Rods are Rods, as long as the small end and big end bearings fit snug and their ok length, go for it.

I don't know shit about V8s internally, so i dunno if they have the same size bearings.

[sorry for double post :| ]

Edited by turbo x-trail

due to the amount of interest, and the off topic posting in for sale threads i have decided to start this thread for discussion on fitting h-beam rods into rb30 engines

i am currently doing it with scat rods http://www.scatcrankshafts.com/FS_800.htm

they are small journal 6" chev h-beam rods.i got a set of 8 for $700 retail price.they need to have about 2mm machined off both the little end and big end thickness.they also need to have a nissan little end bush installed.chev bearings must be used as the dowels on the bearings are on the opposite side to nissan bearings.

i will be keeping tabs on all costs and and details on all machine work so others will not have to worry about what is involved.

anybody who has already done this please post what you have done to fit yours

copy from CT

This has been covered numerous times,

You will find it more expensive to do this procedure than to buy a set of rods designed for RB30

As mentioned about 2 mm is require to be machined off the b/e and small end sides, the small ends then need to be rebushed, the bearings also need to be narrowed, the b/e tunnels then need to be resized due to the narrowing process distorting the b/e tunnel of the rod. From memory 60thou Chev bearings are required, and then the std crank has to be machined 7 thou to suit the new b/e tunnel size.

I have a set of SCAT H beams identical to whats been mentioned in my 25/30.

All up it cost me $900 with machining done by myself.

When I was shopping for rods, Spool Conrods never replied to emails, pm's or messages left on the phone...and I waited months. :P

I reply to all my emails usually within 24 hrs - so I obviously didnt get yours.

I never reply to PM's

Sorry if I didnt reply to your phone message, but as I only have one number I do get alot of them.

I have a set of SCAT H beams identical to whats been mentioned in my 25/30.

All up it cost me $900 with machining done by myself.

When I was shopping for rods, Spool Conrods never replied to emails, pm's or messages left on the phone...and I waited months. :P

I KNOW I COULD JUT BUY rb30 ones but when i can get some nice carrillos for next to nothing with pressure wrist pin oiling (will be drysumped) one must ask...

also it my open some options for na motors using 25 or 26 pistons with 6.1 or 6.2" rods to bring the piston up higher for a high comp ratio.....

My mate who builds 888 racing's engines is also an RB30 guru...he buys Argo's off me so id question why he isn't using the pile of Carillo's he has access to. He's in the states at the moment...ill have a chat to him when he gets back and call you Dave.

I machined a set a while ago for a bloke who had already bought them. I had to narrow the rod and machine the outside of it to allow it to fit down the bore, they weren't made to fit an 86mm bore. These rods also needed the small end narrowed to fit between the pin bosses.

Now that there are good quality rods made specificaly for the RB30 at a good price, it's a bit of a waste of time unless you can machine them yourself and buy them very cheap to start with. Most of the used nascar rods for sale are too long (6.2-6.3") to start with though they do run Jap bearing sizes and metric pins. You do need to remember that stuff is used as well and you don't have rod bolt lengths to compare to original and it is probably worth having them crack tested. Some of them also aren't bushed on the small end and require a DLC coated pin, check the price on them..

In all honesty I'd just buy a set of Spool rods, great price, excellent dimensionally and weight-wise and I haven't seen a broken one yet. I used them in an engine recently that ran 3rd (i think) in the last Superlap event and recently had the engine apart and they looked and measured like new.

I haven't used the Precision rods. Anyone who has, can you tell me if they really use a 5/16" rod bolt in them? surely not. Maybe if they were an L19 or Carr bolt it may be a different story. I know some scat ones used to on the SR20 and 3S toyota rods but even they have 3/8" bolts now. Thats a lot of load on a little bolt! Spool and most others run a 3/8" bolt.

There's not many rods around with forced pin oiling until you get to the top end stuff as the holes are usually edm'ed to keep the diameter down. I don't think it's a big benefit unless you're running a vacuum pump and pulling all the oil vapour out of there. A couple of small cuts with a small ball end milling cutter on the thrust face of the big end sends plenty of oil up to the pin and under the piston.

You can get a vacuum relief valve to limit the amount of vacuum the pump will pull in the crankcase. Vacuum is a big benefit as long as you still get the oiling you need and piston pins are one of the things you need vapour/splash for, particularly in engines without piston oil squirters. A roots gear set is a pretty good vacuum pump, particularly when it's well oiled and you have 4 of them sucking so pressure fed pins or a squirter might be a good idea in that case. A .5-.75mm deep cut with a 2mm ball end milling cutter on the thrust face of the big end pointing directly at the pin would work well to get oil up to the pin and under the piston if you don't want to go the edm route.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...