Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

My predictions

The Honda powered Pro Lotus' already do 32's on slicks and will run 34's-35's on R's, which I think will be good enough to win :D

Waldo and Lofty are currently in the 36-37 range and are hoping there cars will do 35's in ideal conditions on new bags...but they have not been able to do it yet. I cannot see anyone going faster than a 34 though.

PRO 34's

OPEN 39's

CLUB 44's I have already done 44's in a CLUB GTR, and I think it would be fast enough to win.

On another note...RE WED and THURS PRACTICE DAYS.

These days are not just for Superlap cars as some people believe, they are open to anyone.

WED is fully booked and there are still spots for THURSDAY. You will have to pre book for these days even if you want to get in the gate. No spectators will be allowed on WED or THURSDAY.

I am instructing on WED and THURS to help some of these OS people. If you would like to book a spot on THURS contact

www.Drivingsolutions.com.au

Edited by Bozman1

Semis or not, I reckon if the open cars aren't down to super car times (ie 1.32) there has been a shitload of money wasted! remember the taxis run small slicks

And I've got to say again, I am amazed how little track time the international drivers have done, even the best drivers will not do their best laps straight up.

Thats why i woudl love to know how good the V8 control tyres are? Considering that the 2010 lap times are no quicker then 2002 lap times I suspect they are pretty shit in terms of outright speed over a single lap. Perhaps a soft comound semi, in bogger diam and width so able to better manage temps, combined with lighter weights and more power/aero...

I suspect you could well be right Duncan, but when you get to the pace of these cars i think you really need to know what you are doing with regards to development so that requires drivers and mechanics... at these speeds a simple sum of parts does not equal pace. So will be interesting to see all the cars with lots of bespoked engineering and how they go compared to a V8 Supercar with a turbo inline 6!??!?!?!

...at those speeds / lap times i am a big believer is less is more!

My prediction, a low 1:33 will win Pro. A 1:38 will win Open...and a cheating GTR will win the R35 GTR class with a low 1:43 :) At least the EVOS have been out electotoothbrushed with the R35 :thumbsup:

:P A cheating GTR ? Not even at the event yet and people getting accused of cheating already....

boxhead - check natsoft online throughout the day. I know some meets its updsated after each race, hopefully the same for superlap.

I wont be there friday however working saturday so at least I'll see something even if its for 5mins!

:P A cheating GTR ? Not even at the event yet and people getting accused of cheating already....

Of course they are cheating. They have uber power and great power delivery. Great chassis and awd system. Great gearboxes, decent std brakes and many only need modded shock bodies to make the shocks adjustable height and accept some slightly different springs to be even better handlers!!!! They are a very quick car and receptive to mods....and they are a $160k. The EVO 9s were the previous cheater spec for the class. The R35 seems to be the perfect car for the class and rules this year.

LOL when something is so good straight out of the factory it takes away some of the romance of throwing spanners at them and making them go quicker :) So cheaterers car.

What will be itneresting is to watch someone throw 150k at one and put a stroker in it. Put something like twin TD06-25Gs on it. Put a PPG gearset in it. Throw some uber 6k a corner shock at it. Rip all the mod con luxury bits out of it and try to get it down to around 1500kgs. Not sure what f anything needs to be done to the computers, but if they are like EVOs then there is probably some time in the tuning of the awd system.

Surely there are going to be mind altering quick R35s in years to come...not sure you are going to see any tuned 997 PDK turbos in Aus (not that they are eligible anyway)

I know the car i want to run, but having a bit of trouble finding the £100,000 to buy it :thumbsup: Its cheater spec, but in a good vs evil sort of way :)

for those of us stuck at work on the friday or saturday is there some sort of email list or sms type list we can get on to get updates during the day?
boxhead - check natsoft online throughout the day. I know some meets its updsated after each race, hopefully the same for superlap.

I wont be there friday however working saturday so at least I'll see something even if its for 5mins!

Not sure if natsoft will upload quick enough through out the day..But will talk to Timing about this

Pretty sure there will be updates on the Superlap website throughout the day...But if not will also chat to the guys about this..

Semis or not, I reckon if the open cars aren't down to super car times (ie 1.32) there has been a shitload of money wasted! remember the taxis run small slicks

280mm wide slick isn't all that small.

I'm going with 32 for open because the Lotus wasn't any slower on semis than slicks last time they ran in 2008 on the Kumho V70. A very good local driver in a very well sorted car, I think will be hard to beat.

Not to forget some of these cars coming have outrageous power to weight figures, much better than a Supercar, and that front straight is long..... So if they can get similar cornering pace to a V8 SC, and be quicker on the straight, then yeah, fast.

exactly most of the guys on here seem to be assuming it will be an aussie car that will win and basing their times off that.... yeah the OS cars are un-known in this neck of the woods but as marlin pointed out some of them have very serious power to weight ratios and very accomplished drivers. things could get very interesting if any of the OS challengers are firing on all cylinders so to speak. :happy:

I assume, perhaps wrongly that whilst there are no doubt going to be great drivers punting very fast cars, I assumed that the drivers would be a 1 second gap to a professional driver, so that is another reason why i think they will be a tad slower then the V8 Supercars. Will be great if i was wrong though!

I dunno, seems to me only the Cyber Evo and Scion have any real power to weight advantage over the HPE... And that's only the one aspect of performance. The Lotus platform has many other advantages - scale-model-like frontal area, low low low Cg, low polar moment of inertia, factory developed aero, etc Then factor in years of development on our tracks in our conditions with a very fast driver at the wheel who's very familiar with EC and the car. They won't be easy to beat IMO - if they are on the right tyres... there's no doubt they left a second or two behind due to tyre choice last time.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...