Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

A little part of me would die if i saw an NA skyline with one of these bad boys. Please don't ruin our reputation.

Ricer mods belong on shit cars, not skylines.

I guarantee that 95% of people will laugh at you if you go ahead with this.

I fail to understand why you believe a turbocharged car is un-necessary.

I love my car to bits and jumping back into an NA car just isn't the same. It's so much nicer to have a car with decent mid-range, 90% of my driving is between 2-3k rpm.

Edited by lukebaldan
  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

A little part of me would die if i saw an NA skyline with one of these bad boys. Please don't ruin our reputation.

Ricer mods belong on shit cars, not skylines.

I guarantee that 95% of people will laugh at you if you go ahead with this.

I fail to understand why you believe a turbocharged car is un-necessary.

I love my car to bits and jumping back into an NA car just isn't the same. It's so much nicer to have a car with decent mid-range, 90% of my driving is between 2-3k rpm.

there are still plenty of ricer mods on skylines as it is.

a lot of people class a lancer with an evo bodykit as being ricer, therefore that makes a NA skyline with a GTR bodykit as being ricer as well.

Just don't forget to combine the Turbo Whistler with the Hyclone for maximum killerwasps!! Or should I say killer'rasps'?

You might want to throw one of these chips in too http://cgi.ebay.com.au/15BHP-Chip-Nissan-M...#ht_3672wt_1169 That'll squeeze the juice out of the N/A!! :(

Disclaimer: I don't recommend ANY of the above products!! You would have to be an absolute moron to use them on any car, especially a Skyline!

That's quite an insult.

good, it was supposed to be, but it highlights how when mods are done to a type of car that is similar to what you drive it is ok, but when the same mods are done to a different type of car it suddenly becomes stupid.

you either have fitting stupid body kits to any car as being stupid, or not stupid. you might think a NA skyline with a GTR body kit and big stupid drift wing looks good and think that a lancer with an evo body kit looks like crap, but there might be someone who thinks the opposite, that the skyline looks stupid and the lancer looks good. i personally think that they both look stupid. but then i think that most big bodykits are stupid on pretty much any car

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
    • The downside of this is when you try to track the car, as soon as you hit ABS you get introduced to a unbled system. I want to avoid this. I do not want to bleed/flush/jack up the car twice just to bleed the f**kin car.
×
×
  • Create New...