Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I will be quite happy with an RBR WDC and Constructors :P Dont really care if its Vettel or Webber, though if the first 3 races are anything to go by, especially the last race then Webber really needs Vettel on the 3rd row to have a hope of winning a race ;)

Shanghai in 13 days :(

By barcelona, pretty much everybody will have copied the f-duct... apparently. I hope the Mclaren engineer who thunk it up got himself a hell of a bonus!

Other than that and redbull's supposed ride height/undertray structure being slightly cheeky, nobody thought up anything new? Disappointing

loved it- looked great. shame He won't be able to get away with it again now He's been given a warning for it

it's all been covered now, but He wasn't blocking Petrov as Vitaly wasn't anywhere near close enough to attempt an overtake, and wouldn't have been able to pass when pulling into clear air anyway

Personally the weaving was bollocks. I bet if that was JPM he would've got whacked with a stop-go! A drive through would have sufficed however.. What he did was foolish, dangerous and most unnecessary in my opinion, such demonstrations only serve to further my dislike and distaste for Loulou, as such he isn't doing himself any favours by continually placing himself in such polarising positions..

loved it- looked great. shame He won't be able to get away with it again now He's been given a warning for it

it's all been covered now, but He wasn't blocking Petrov as Vitaly wasn't anywhere near close enough to attempt an overtake, and wouldn't have been able to pass when pulling into clear air anyway

the one move per straight rule/driving standard has been in place for many years now.

petrov not close enough? you couldn't get any closer without being alongside! he was as close if not closer than the last lap where he did pass hamilton.

Personally the weaving was bollocks. I bet if that was JPM he would've got whacked with a stop-go! A drive through would have sufficed however.. What he did was foolish, dangerous and most unnecessary in my opinion, such demonstrations only serve to further my dislike and distaste for Loulou, as such he isn't doing himself any favours by continually placing himself in such polarising positions..

Agreed. Can you imagine the world wide outrage had it been Schuey who had of done it.

as if petrov was going to try and pull along side someone while they are weaving side to side

Exactly, pulling alongside someone weaving so erratically would be as daft and idiotic as the weaving itself! In all seriousness, as if Petrov really had any other alternative OTHER than to follow Homoton and has ridiculous weaving. If doucheton had half a brain he would've gone to the pitwall and held his mac on the inside line, if in fact Petrov didn't have the speed as claimed, then Ruskie would've not had a chance on the outside. I find myself becoming more and more repulsed by this robotic twat, a few people here and a lot on crash are claiming that he did it to break the tow and was not 'blocking' as such. If weaving in that fashion had PREVENTED the following driver (in this case, Petrov) from attempting an overtaking manoeuvre, then could that not be deemed 'blocking' on those grounds??? As Savman said, as if Petrov was dumb enough to try, that would've caused a catastrophic accident at such speed.. I fear a dangerous precedent may have been set in Malaysia, I hope that 'IF' the next example of this is displayed, it is crushed with impunity, punished severely, and no longer left to blight this already badly tainted sport.. :)

Edited by Marco-R34GTT

In the usual drafting scenario, the chasing driver will pull out of the stream to attempt an overtake, and then the defending driver is allowed that single change of line in defence of his position; but here Hamilton moved first, and Petrov followed

If He was close enough to overtake, why not just stay on line and drive past? There was more than enough space. It's not like Lewis would have driven in to Him if He'd pulled along side. It was Vitaly's decision to follow in Lewis's wheel tracks and stay in His mirrors. I wouldn't be inclined to really call it dangerous since it was well before the braking zone.

At worst it was a little cheeky, but fair enough for the stewards to issue the warning.

The braking zone isn't brought to question, as you said, the event occurred no where near the braking zone. However, Hamilton's reckless weaving prevented Petrov from making ANY move and deprived him of any 'safe' opportunity to overtake, what was hazardous that the cars were accelerating rapidly and at that point of the straight they would still have been going awfully fast, and as such, a prang between the two could have been potentially horrendous. Imagine if every leading car weaved like Hamo did? Chaos would ensue, and there would be some almighty pile-ups, it would be little more than open-wheeler F1 NASCAR.. That is one thing I NEVER want to see.

At worst a little cheeky?? You've got to be kidding! If Petrov had called the bluff and sailed up next to Hamo, only for them to have collided, I wonder if you'd be saying the same thing???

I'm saying He wouldn't have moved back across track if Vitaly had nosed along side. He obviously knew exactly where Petrov was. To hear you tell the story, you'd think the Renault was closing on Hamilton like a Veyron coming up behind a 3-cylinder Daihatsu. The McLaren's have currently got the most straight-line speed of all the field anyway.

Anywho, I'm over this now. Have the last word if you want.

I just like how the BBC commentary team didn't even mention the weaving.

Let's face it. He shouldn't be doing it. Yes he drove a great race and overtook many cars during the GP, but I think the weaving was going too far in trying to defend his position.

I'm saying He wouldn't have moved back across track if Vitaly had nosed along side. He obviously knew exactly where Petrov was. To hear you tell the story, you'd think the Renault was closing on Hamilton like a Veyron coming up behind a 3-cylinder Daihatsu. The McLaren's have currently got the most straight-line speed of all the field anyway.

Anywho, I'm over this now. Have the last word if you want.

Well I think it is fair to say that it is true that the Mac has the highest straight line speed of all the cars on the grid (thanks to the Merc engine and F-duct). However, Petrov did get better drive out of the hairpin and was tucked up pretty close to loulou's gearbox, he would've been getting a decent dose of slip-stream up the straight, so in that sense the Renault had every opportunity to retake position much like the previous lap. Horses for courses I suppose, whether it is lewis or not I don't care, just because I don't like him much doesn't mean this is a witch-hunt, if it had of been Petrov doing it to lewis, I may well poke some fun at loulou, but I'd be having a fair crack at Petrov, or any other driver for that matter, Webz, Sebvet, Schumi, Nando, anyone... It is just unfortunate for loulou that he is regularly finding himself involved in these silly predicaments...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
×
×
  • Create New...