Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Did you notice if it was wingless? I've seen one that colour getting around without the rear spoiler.

If it's the one I've seen, oh god yes it is. Except for lacking a wing. Looks retarded.

Yeh no rear spoiler, had a Brazilian.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/778/#findComment-6637706
Share on other sites

blame Dan.

He should have known 4 was not enough.

when I was getting the girl sprayed they soda blasted through my bonnet. So the guy bought 2 more. (to be sure to be sure)

I had one painted the same colour as the car and the other gloss black - Win !!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/778/#findComment-6638025
Share on other sites

and repainted too at no extra cost.

Mind you I did pay what I consider a premium price but nothing has been extra.

Plus he is going to fix a few chips I've picked up at minimal charge in January :D

oh and he's doing a repair & paint under insurance on my 34 early December

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/778/#findComment-6638064
Share on other sites

Spotted FJ720 on Friday arvo, then spotted the car again this arvo. Gave a wave this arvo but methinks it was your missus driving lol. She waved back but was also like WTF - particularly coz I wasn't even driving a skyline hahaha

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/778/#findComment-6641983
Share on other sites

lol, yeah, I've started seeing another one going around, almost identical to mine. young bloke driving.

We'll catch him yet...

Spotted our resident Frenchman in the Clio this morning turning onto Belconnen way.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/30059-spotted/page/778/#findComment-6642528
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...