Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yes i know there are other rb24 threads out there, i've read them, none really seem to answer my question however. I'm not an engine man, as ull come to find out, but i know one thing, i love the sound, revability and reliability of my rb20. i'm not looking for huge power figures, but some more power would be nice. I dont want to be like everyone else as put a 25,26,30 in, doesnt interest me. the RB22/24 does however and i came across an opp to buy one in a car already built. It's a Tomei kit, so forged pistons and GTR crank. i guess my worry is, that the 24 will basically just be a 25, but really unreliable.

looking at the bore and stroke differences it makes me think, being someone chasing a nice revvy engine, am i taking a step back going with the 24? will going less over-square make it less rev happy than the 25/26/30, especially with the smaller head of the 20?

if so is it worth me still picking up this nice little package, but maybe replace the long GTR crank with a 25 or 20 one, go back to the shorter stroke, but keep all the goodies that came with it and sell the GTR crank for some nice $$$?

i dont mind building a little 20, but when this came a long, it just seemed to perfect to pass up, most of what i read into rb24's was that they were just to expensive for what u were getting, i guess im asking u guys, if u took the cost aspect out, would u go a internally modified rb24 over a stock 25 or 30 if u were chasing a bullet proof rev happy engine?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/302957-rb24/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

RB24 has the same stroke as an RB26, only runs a smaller, lighter piston. So with less inertia you would expect the thing to spin nicely to big revs if all is balanced and tuned well.

If you have the Tomei pistons then you cannot go back to the RB20 or 25 crank as they are designed to work with GTR rods and crank re deck height etc. Change the crank and rods and you will end up with a strange compression ratio.

If you have a well put together RB24 just throw it in. The whole rev happy etc has a lot to do with tuning, bolts on ie turbo. A 2530 isnt going to do a lot. Something like a 2835/3071/TD06-25G/T67 is going to provide enough airflow that it will happily spin to 8,000rpm and rev out nice and quick.

LOL, one day i will find out when i put all the Tomei gear i have under the couch into an RB20 :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/302957-rb24/#findComment-5022101
Share on other sites

RB22 = 82mm pistons (4agze, tomei or custom)

RB23 = 82mm pistons, RB25 crank and rods

RB24 = 82mm pistons, RB26 crank and rods

Ben Ellis built one up for the HPI project R32... the engine build started in issue 44 (it has an orange background on the cover) i think.. the RB24 used Tomei pistons and head gasket, RB26 Rods, R33 GTR crank, and lots of machining

the tops of the rods need a bump to be removed and the block needs to semi circles machined in each cylinder for the big end to clear, the crank, rods, and pistons need to be all balanced together.

the bores needed to be opened to 82mm with tomei pistons or 4agze pistons.

the rb20 has shitloads of material in the block so it wont be any weaker... but its worth getting your block checked over.

i cant remember if the combustion chambers in the head need to be opened up a little to fit the new bore size.

the people that say it isnt worth it are mainly the RB20 haters.. why do all that engine work when you can drop in an rb25 or rb26 for the same money?? coz you have a brand new, rev happy engine, with more low down torque to spool up a bigger turbo and still rev out... thats why!

building an rb24 in reality is no more expensive than rebuilding any other performance engine.. the machine work is all done by cnc machines, so it doesnt matter whether its boring it for 2 thour oversized pistons or 82mm pistons.

im thinking about building my rb20 to an rb24... but it does cost alot.. but it will be worth it.. its different but its been done before.

nisskid... go for it.. you know you want to!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/302957-rb24/#findComment-5022298
Share on other sites

im getting rb23 (25crank 26 rods) built right now for the exact positive reasons mention... rather than going the throw in a rb25 std thing

for a little less capacity etc im getting a brand spanking new forged engine with more torque than the std rb20 i was pretty happy with anyway and will rev its nuts off rather than throwing in a 100K old rb25

especially if its done for you and all in good nick at right price theoretically you'd have a better package than a std rb25 stuff

Edited by bcozican
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/302957-rb24/#findComment-5022320
Share on other sites

theoretically you'd have a better package than a std rb25 stuff

Except for the fact you have a head that (roughly) flows 30% less.

So you are needing to screw boost in like a champion, and rev it's ass off to get it to do the same thing a RB25 could do with far less stress - which is equal to overall life.

There are pro's and con's for each argument.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/302957-rb24/#findComment-5022443
Share on other sites

Anyone done a 24 here? What's the approx cost for parts? and labour?

Rocco's Performance did the hpi one... they might be the best to speak to.

2nd hand 26 rods and crank are easily sourced.. you can use 25 rods if you want to be cheap... they are the same as rb26 but 26 are betterer.

you can use r32 rb26 crank, but r33 is betterer.. then you can run the r33 oil pump.

the pistons are readily available through tomei, nengun do them for around $1700 for a piston kit..

tomei head gasket for 83.5mm bore in 1mm, 1.2mm and 1.5mm is around $350 from nengun..

block prep and balancing i have no idea of.. that is my next research point.

*i am in no way affiliated with Roccos, i just know thats who did the project r32 one*

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/302957-rb24/#findComment-5022458
Share on other sites

Except for the fact you have a head that (roughly) flows 30% less.

So you are needing to screw boost in like a champion, and rev it's ass off to get it to do the same thing a RB25 could do with far less stress - which is equal to overall life.

There are pro's and con's for each argument.

yeah i totally agree, for me .. i blew my engine but still have all supporting bits cams injectors ecu etc etc to go on and not looking for super mega hp so getting one built and having little things done to help oil flow etc etc

so rather than have to sell most stuff off first then do the swap it suited me

head getting ported n polished etc in build so should help a bit does anyone know the mmcf friggin lcympv things flow rating of the std rb 20 and rb 25 heads??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/302957-rb24/#findComment-5022539
Share on other sites

Rocco's Performance did the hpi one... they might be the best to speak to.

2nd hand 26 rods and crank are easily sourced.. you can use 25 rods if you want to be cheap... they are the same as rb26 but 26 are betterer.

you can use r32 rb26 crank, but r33 is betterer.. then you can run the r33 oil pump.

the pistons are readily available through tomei, nengun do them for around $1700 for a piston kit..

tomei head gasket for 83.5mm bore in 1mm, 1.2mm and 1.5mm is around $350 from nengun..

block prep and balancing i have no idea of.. that is my next research point.

*i am in no way affiliated with Roccos, i just know thats who did the project r32 one*

$$wise I'll prob just follow the hoards and shoot for 300kw with 25 and standard internals when I want more power.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/302957-rb24/#findComment-5022640
Share on other sites

A near stock Rb26 engineered will do the same job, legally.

like i said.... RB20 haters... what part of making an RB24 is illegal??? its all neatly contained in what looks like a standard rb20.

removing and transplanting engines takes the spirit out of the car.. rb25's are boring.. they are the middle child.. i would rather spend $20000 on my RB20 and make whatever power it makes than put an rb25 in my r32.

a stock rb26 would tromp the rb20... no shit... but the rb26 belongs in the GTR... like the harbour bridge and bondi beach belong in sydney.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/302957-rb24/#findComment-5022676
Share on other sites

i would rather spend $20000 on my RB20 and make whatever power it makes than put an rb25 in my r32.

and you have somehow managed to take the rb20/r32 fanboi shit to a whole new level of wank...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/302957-rb24/#findComment-5022738
Share on other sites

and you have somehow managed to take the rb20/r32 fanboi shit to a whole new level of wank...

:rant: ill take that as a compliment.

why are people so scared of engine work??? atmo and v8 guys thrive on calculations and mixing and matching this with that to get this. everything gets stroked and ported and balanced

turbo guys just wanna push the stock bottom end as far as it can go, if the stock bottom lets go, they put in another one.

rb26 has nothing on 2jz anyway... id be putting one of them in a go kart.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/302957-rb24/#findComment-5022801
Share on other sites

RB20 head can't be that bad, my cefiro arrived with a rb20 head, east bear 1.8mm HG on a rb25 bottom end.. Was good enough to compete in the advan drift meeting.. Theres an r32 about in japan built by garage testorossa (sp) with an rb20 head on 30 bottom end.

Hands down would take a 24 if it had enough research and $$$ are behind it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/302957-rb24/#findComment-5022811
Share on other sites

why are people so scared of engine work??? atmo and v8 guys thrive on calculations and mixing and matching this with that to get this. everything gets stroked and ported and balanced

Only money and knowledge. RB25 is cheap and been done to death.

That being said I would have more respect for an RB24 setup.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/302957-rb24/#findComment-5022844
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
    • You just need a wheel alignment after, so just set them to the same as current and drive to the shop. As there are 2 upper links it may also be worth adding adjustable upper front links at the same time; these reduce bump steer when you move the camber (note that setting those correctly takes a lot longer as you have to recheck the camber at each length of the toe arm, through a range of movement, so you could just ignore that unless the handling becomes unpredictable)
×
×
  • Create New...