Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just a word of warning too the two skyline drivers who are cutting skids in the new area of muno para west about 8 pm tonight your rego numbers have been taking and have been reported to the police by 3 of my neighbours .

when i get a group of people knocking on my door just cause i own a skyline asking if i know you clowns it dosent make me happy .the small street your cutting skids in leads straight into my driveway and if any of you end up up out of controll in my driveway dont expect help from me as i will be running out with my sledge hammer and practicing my poor panel beating skills on your heads .

there are young families with young kids around btw the house you hang out at the residents have had words with him and have been on the ph too his landlord you aint doing your mate any favours .

if you want too hang skids ffs go 10 mins down the road too out where there are no houses but to hang skids in the entrence of a housing estate is madness . we know you have done it b4 but much later at night this time they got both your rego numbers .

i can tell you there are some people atm that want to meet you face to face and you really dont want to meet them

YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED

mid life crisis

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/304439-to-the-2-retarded-skyline-drivers/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Meh.

so you would have no probs with these tools cutting ringeys on a narrow street at the end of your driveway ? if so your a bigger tool than they are

think about the big picture the police get 3 calls in 15 mins about skylines driving like hoons ........what do you think the next car there going too pull over is ?

i also dont like the fact i get a group of people banging on my door just cause i drive a skyline asking if i know these tools

Edited by mid life crisis

yeah not good to hear off this Dean.....but more then a couple of witnesses reporting the rego the cops would surely take some action in regards to their hooning behaviour....i hear a few times someone in a RB powered car hooning around in my area.....its a shame really

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...