Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

http://www.huntingdalegolf.com.au/guests/welcome.mhtml

'n bring your Palmer, Nicklaus, Mickelson & Woods masks... whover wins the honour for the next hole gets to wear the Woods mask - it always gets the girls. :P

Morack has some interesting holes but they aren't the best maintained (read: turn to shit in the winter).

All public golf courses suck once you've played as a guest on a members course lol.

Maybe try either Berwick Montuna or [http://www.beaconhillsgolf.com.au]Beaconhills[/url] (if you want a bitch of a walk :P )

Berwick Montuna is a pretty good course though for those of us that can comfortable fit under the term "hack" :D

yarra bend fairfield good public course ,Malvern valley waverley road good front 9 or something like the dunes or eagle ridge if you want to loose heaps of balls,crack the shits and want to go home after 14 holes because you have tried to hit the ball 200 times and you have 50 shots to go and another 5 balls to find..buggies needed there

come down to franga!

being serious, centenary park is a good course. they have a direct plumb into recycled water so the place is green as.

most of the holes are pretty wide, so you can get away with a lot.

Montuna is good, but damn its tight around there.

come down to franga!

being serious, centenary park is a good course. they have a direct plumb into recycled water so the place is green as.

most of the holes are pretty wide, so you can get away with a lot.

Montuna is good, but damn its tight around there.

thats like the golf course im near, they use recycled water so its very green and its just been redone and its all finished, its awesome. also im so close to it i just walk. Also i can yell at people who are on the green of the 1st hole lol. :D

The back 9 @ Brighton Public isn't bad....might be getting pretty dry though by now. I did'nt like the front 9.

A easy course is Royal Elsternwick...very short, green and only 9 holes. And the Elsternwick pub is across the road and they have ACE parma's!

Albert park is good...long, but good. You will need a motorized cart for it.

Most course's this time of year will be pretty dry :D

could always have a can a hole till the the 14th then go off road buggy racing to the 19th for a few more beers.beats having to look for balls and falling asleep at the tee

hahaha we were doing shots of what ever we were drinking for however many we went over par. and it was getting worse by half way lol

have put in a request at albert park woot

come down to franga!

being serious, centenary park is a good course. they have a direct plumb into recycled water so the place is green as.

most of the holes are pretty wide, so you can get away with a lot.

Montuna is good, but damn its tight around there.

That. Centenary park is good for a public course, wide as it is it'll test you, but as far as public golf courses go it's pretty damn long, (it is wide, though) which may not be great for a random hit and/or beginner to the game. I score terribly there, it's cursed.

Also cursed, albert park driving range. Seriously there's some dark magic going on there because every time I go to the range I magically lose a hell of a lot of distance. I went to Morack after that to feel good about my golfing ability. Until they removed the driving range.

Malvern Valley is better than Albert Park IMO... we play at all those courses, Brighton, Sandy, Chelt, Elsternwick etc... Malvern is still the preference though

Brighton very dry now, Elsternwick only for a cheeky 9 after work as its pretty bad... Sandy really busy on the weekends... Malvern has the best fairways, back 9 is really nice (for a public course)... went round the back 9 in 37 a few months ago... but haven't been able to repeat the feat... frustrating farkin game!

the back 9 at malvern is mostly par 3s or 4s,and the 2nd hole has changed on the front 9 .There is an over 35s singles night at the club house on weekends.Be carefull good chance to get a hole in 1 but the back 9 is rough

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...