Jump to content
SAU Community

  

8 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

I have a dilemma. I've been reading about cat-back for the last 2 weeks. I have to swap my RS*R Exmagt2 for either:

1. a 3' non straight pipe cat-back ( I.E: Magnaflow XL turbo) + Swap the downpipe for an Aftermarket.

http://www.magnaflow.com/02product/shopexd...ain&id=8264

xl02.jpg

Or

2. The OEM cat-back which is 2.5' but straight pipe + adding a Y pipe with a electric open-valve ( cutout) just before the cat. But I'm afraid it will be way too loud to run it on the street and won't use it enought to make it worth the hassle.

006-2.jpg

EchappementOEMGTR2.jpg

3. Varex cat-back with the butterfly valve but is there any backpressure problem with this exhaust because if you close the valve it will only have a 1 inch hole?

VarexDiagram.png

Which one should be less restrictive?? a 3 inch 3 chamber system or a 2.5' straight free-flowing..

For the moments, I'm fairly stock ( approx. 340whp) but I plan on upgrading the turbo( -5) and go to the 450ish whp marks and I don't want to loose like 50 HP because of those exhausts.

Edited by cobrAA
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/305899-which-cat-back-is-less-restrictive/
Share on other sites

waits for nismoid's normal exhaust answer :P

''you can have a quiet exhaust which IS fairly well flowing"

:teehee: Nah i've got a better one! :P

450rwhp - you have the wrong wrong wrong turbo choice. The choice you want is the Garrett -9s!!!!!

Not really on topic, but needs to be said as far too many people are poorly informed about turbo selection.

Varex - Crap. They sound dreadful. I've not heard one car fitted that sounds any good. Must be the materials used, they just give off a woeful exhaust note.

OEM - Crap... OEM is like the pinnacle of restriction. You can't hope to make 330rwkw with a 2.5" exhaust.

Magnaflow - NFI, but just looking at the design i cannot see how that's going to flow at all well.

Why don't you just build a proper 3" straight through system?? It will 100% be under 90dB if done right.

Hell even off th shelf jap systems are under 90dB and you can get them 2nd hand for $600-$800 worst case.

Ideally you want a 3.5" system for the power goal, but you will "get away" with a 3" if you must, without question, be legal.

3.5" is a bit harder to get to legal without some love :bunny:

:P Nah i've got a better one! :thumbsup:

450rwhp - you have the wrong wrong wrong turbo choice. The choice you want is the Garrett -9s!!!!!

Not really on topic, but needs to be said as far too many people are poorly informed about turbo selection.

Varex - Crap. They sound dreadful. I've not heard one car fitted that sounds any good. Must be the materials used, they just give off a woeful exhaust note.

OEM - Crap... OEM is like the pinnacle of restriction. You can't hope to make 330rwkw with a 2.5" exhaust.

Magnaflow - NFI, but just looking at the design i cannot see how that's going to flow at all well.

Why don't you just build a proper 3" straight through system?? It will 100% be under 90dB if done right.

Hell even off th shelf jap systems are under 90dB and you can get them 2nd hand for $600-$800 worst case.

Ideally you want a 3.5" system for the power goal, but you will "get away" with a 3" if you must, without question, be legal.

3.5" is a bit harder to get to legal without some love :P

The problem is to be legal I have to have a non-straight through system( excepting the OEM) or else I will get a exhaust ticket and will have to go to court to fight it( something I'm freakin tired to do)

I read an article in HPI where they tested an OEM catback against after market on an R32 GTR with mild mods. Had 3" from turbos to the cat back.

In the article they CLAIMED they made 2kw more with the OEM.

Edited by Cosa
Varex - Crap. They sound dreadful. I've not heard one car fitted that sounds any good. Must be the materials used, they just give off a woeful exhaust note.

Not entirely true. The rear mufflers/cannons might not sound the best, but i use one of their universal ones underneath the car to keep the car quite when needed (99% of the time its opened) and you would never pick something wasn't right on the car when it is opened. When it is shut its just quite as all hell. Im getting a 3" straight pipe to bolt on and off to replace the varex when needed due to the Varex weighing half a million kg's and sitting quite low.

Not entirely true. The rear mufflers/cannons might not sound the best, but i use one of their universal ones underneath the car to keep the car quite when needed (99% of the time its opened) and you would never pick something wasn't right on the car when it is opened. When it is shut its just quite as all hell. Im getting a 3" straight pipe to bolt on and off to replace the varex when needed due to the Varex weighing half a million kg's and sitting quite low.

Yeah, my valve would be open 99% of the time. the 1% will be when I see a police. It is that heavy?

Do you have a sound clip of that varex :worship: ?

All those catbacks look shit to be honest.

Get something fabricated, will probably end up coming out on top in both price and performance.

If you're paranoid about the loudness of your car get some mid mufflers / resonator or just baffle the shit out of a box and call it your exhaust.

Edited by Parag0n

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...