Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi peoples,

I got a bit of a curly one for you all!

I just had my car (r33 S2) tuned with a safc2, and althoug i am very happy with the peak output the car achieved, my tuner told me the mid range is being held back a bit becuase of the knock sensors detecting some knock. Obviously the result is timming being pulled out and petrol put in. At about 5500rpm it comes good again and the power curve heads upwards dramatically.

My problem with this is that the tuner told me that it is common for knock sensors to be overly sensitive from factory, as he was unable to detect any knock using his own form of knock detection. I have read threads on how to block out the knock sensors by replacing them with a resitor, or by installing diodes between the ecu and the knock sensors, but am unsure of wether this is a wise move.

Has anyone got any experience with this problem, as i would like to improve my mid range tune without changing computers or anything like that. Any help would be great...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/306075-knock-sensor-question/
Share on other sites

Sounds to me like a poor excuse from a bad tune.

What it would sound like to me on face value is you are still hitting Rich/Retard on the factory ECU even with the S-AFC.

Now, correctly tuned/setup the S-AFC should bend the signal enough to avoid any factory ECU retarding elements.

The factory knock sensors are not over sensitive, you should not be adding restrictors and so on.

If you think he is right, get another one and replace your factory one. I wouldn't be surprised if the exact same thing happened - because of what i said about about poor S-AFC setup.

The factory knock sensors pick up other things besides knock and it registers it as knock, this is why tuners use there own knock sensing equipment, the proper way to fix the issue is a full ecu like a power fc then you wont have these issues.

^ umm the PFC will still pickup the exact same knock level - if the sensor is playing up.

They can pickup a starter motor being loose and banging around for instance.

However putting in a PFC won't magically reduce the sensors sensitivity, or what it reports, so you would still see "danger" on the PFC... IF the knock sensor is acting up.

In which case you would never know if the car is in danger or not...

I still go with what i said initially though, swap out the sensor, if the same thing happens it's the tuner or something unlucky like a loose starter motor.

^ umm the PFC will still pickup the exact same knock level - if the sensor is playing up.

They can pickup a starter motor being loose and banging around for instance.

However putting in a PFC won't magically reduce the sensors sensitivity, or what it reports, so you would still see "danger" on the PFC... IF the knock sensor is acting up.

In which case you would never know if the car is in danger or not...

I still go with what i said initially though, swap out the sensor, if the same thing happens it's the tuner or something unlucky like a loose starter motor.

Very true, i have seen lots of reports of people getting high knock figures but when the tuner is using the after market knock detection there is no or very little knock, replacing the knock sensor( of which i have 2 from a spare engine i bought if you want to try it) may cancel out some of what the factory ecu gets but they are well known for registering a lot more knock than is actually there which will always result in a lower quality tune when only using a piggy back.

Sounds to me like a poor excuse from a bad tune.

What it would sound like to me on face value is you are still hitting Rich/Retard on the factory ECU even with the S-AFC.

Now, correctly tuned/setup the S-AFC should bend the signal enough to avoid any factory ECU retarding elements.

The tuner i used is one of the most recomended in my area. His comment on the overley sensitive sensors was a generalisation about the sensitivity of factory sensors. Basically he meant they lean on the side of caution a little too much.

It's sounds like "word3d" has also heard of this, going by what he said about tuners not detecting knock even though the sensors are dectecting something.

Also safc only bends the singnal of the voltage from the air flow meter, so how could that influence R&R kicking in for knock? i know you can stop

R&R kicking in for exceeding the factory set airflow reading, but not for knock!

I never said the 'apparent' knock was related - just that it sounded like an excuse for R&R kicking in as a result of a job not being done 100% right.

As i said, swap out the sensor, you'll soon find out where the issue lies.

I have had a few GTR's and S14's that show high knock figures for no reason, one in particular was a SR20 S14, on the Kmon is was silent, ran a very safe map in it, yet the PFC D-jetro would show up to 50-60 on decel and even at idle would hover around 15-20, at wot it would often hit 95, I went over every squar millimeter of that engine bay, not a single thing loose or contributing. 6 months later I did an engine build for more power, same thing with knock, did not change.

Eventualy I replaced the knock sensor at a regular service and it dropped to about 3-4 at idle and 15 odd on decel with 50-60's at WOT (usualy see 25's to 30's on similar setups) I then replaced the complete knock harness from sensor to ECU, didnt make a difference. I even tried to switch out the PFC's with its sister car running identical setup and still the car im mention would always read close to double,

What I did notice though, if you run a hard core twin plate or tripple plate clutch it can be a very good contributer, SR20's knock sensors usualy go balistic right before/as they chow the teeth off 3rd gear as well. Not saying somthing is wrong with your driveline, just that it could be somthing a little futher down the line thats causing your odd readings.

Good luck, hope you find the problem.

Eventualy I replaced the knock sensor at a regular service

Was this a genuine article or aftermarket. I am presuming that given your circumstances they would be new, not 2nd hand.

Very expensive?

Where from?

Thanks for your replies guys, it is a bit of a grey area i know. Im sure someone else is learning from all this!

people forget that with the SAFC there are always 2 actions for every adjustment.

SO if you get the mixture nice (usually by leaning it out from the factory rich settings) the second action is to the timing table.

Reduce fuel = increse timing

Increase fuel = decrease timing

If you take out too much fuel you generally add too much timing especially around peak torque in the midrange.

Finally if for some reason the car switches over to the low octane map the tuning is done based on the wrong map. A good practice is to run a very aggressive ramp rate once finished then turn the car off for 30seconds and redo the run just to make sure both runs are identical. If it was in the low octane map for the first run the car will most likely knock its head off and be lean on the second run.

I hate SAFC's on anything mildy smart (r34's etc) as it is impossible to get what i consider good results... especially as i monitor the base tables with nistune and see just how average the base figures are to work with.

  • 3 weeks later...
Was this a genuine article or aftermarket. I am presuming that given your circumstances they would be new, not 2nd hand.

Very expensive?

Where from?

Thanks for your replies guys, it is a bit of a grey area i know. Im sure someone else is learning from all this!

Owned , I just had my knock sensors replaced , problem with sensors was found with a Apexi Fc hand controller , cost is $ 350 per sensor from Nissan not including install - big $$$$$$$, must remove exhaust manifold! The other option is to overide the fault with ECU upgrade .

Edited by NISSAN GTR
Owned , I just had my knock sensors replaced , problem with sensors was found with a Apexi Fc hand controller , cost is $ 350 per sensor from Nissan not including install - big $$$$$$$, The other option is to overide the fault with ECU upgrade .
how silly of me . it is the wrong side Edited by NISSAN GTR

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...