Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi peoples,

I got a bit of a curly one for you all!

I just had my car (r33 S2) tuned with a safc2, and althoug i am very happy with the peak output the car achieved, my tuner told me the mid range is being held back a bit becuase of the knock sensors detecting some knock. Obviously the result is timming being pulled out and petrol put in. At about 5500rpm it comes good again and the power curve heads upwards dramatically.

My problem with this is that the tuner told me that it is common for knock sensors to be overly sensitive from factory, as he was unable to detect any knock using his own form of knock detection. I have read threads on how to block out the knock sensors by replacing them with a resitor, or by installing diodes between the ecu and the knock sensors, but am unsure of wether this is a wise move.

Has anyone got any experience with this problem, as i would like to improve my mid range tune without changing computers or anything like that. Any help would be great...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/306075-knock-sensor-question/
Share on other sites

Sounds to me like a poor excuse from a bad tune.

What it would sound like to me on face value is you are still hitting Rich/Retard on the factory ECU even with the S-AFC.

Now, correctly tuned/setup the S-AFC should bend the signal enough to avoid any factory ECU retarding elements.

The factory knock sensors are not over sensitive, you should not be adding restrictors and so on.

If you think he is right, get another one and replace your factory one. I wouldn't be surprised if the exact same thing happened - because of what i said about about poor S-AFC setup.

The factory knock sensors pick up other things besides knock and it registers it as knock, this is why tuners use there own knock sensing equipment, the proper way to fix the issue is a full ecu like a power fc then you wont have these issues.

^ umm the PFC will still pickup the exact same knock level - if the sensor is playing up.

They can pickup a starter motor being loose and banging around for instance.

However putting in a PFC won't magically reduce the sensors sensitivity, or what it reports, so you would still see "danger" on the PFC... IF the knock sensor is acting up.

In which case you would never know if the car is in danger or not...

I still go with what i said initially though, swap out the sensor, if the same thing happens it's the tuner or something unlucky like a loose starter motor.

^ umm the PFC will still pickup the exact same knock level - if the sensor is playing up.

They can pickup a starter motor being loose and banging around for instance.

However putting in a PFC won't magically reduce the sensors sensitivity, or what it reports, so you would still see "danger" on the PFC... IF the knock sensor is acting up.

In which case you would never know if the car is in danger or not...

I still go with what i said initially though, swap out the sensor, if the same thing happens it's the tuner or something unlucky like a loose starter motor.

Very true, i have seen lots of reports of people getting high knock figures but when the tuner is using the after market knock detection there is no or very little knock, replacing the knock sensor( of which i have 2 from a spare engine i bought if you want to try it) may cancel out some of what the factory ecu gets but they are well known for registering a lot more knock than is actually there which will always result in a lower quality tune when only using a piggy back.

Sounds to me like a poor excuse from a bad tune.

What it would sound like to me on face value is you are still hitting Rich/Retard on the factory ECU even with the S-AFC.

Now, correctly tuned/setup the S-AFC should bend the signal enough to avoid any factory ECU retarding elements.

The tuner i used is one of the most recomended in my area. His comment on the overley sensitive sensors was a generalisation about the sensitivity of factory sensors. Basically he meant they lean on the side of caution a little too much.

It's sounds like "word3d" has also heard of this, going by what he said about tuners not detecting knock even though the sensors are dectecting something.

Also safc only bends the singnal of the voltage from the air flow meter, so how could that influence R&R kicking in for knock? i know you can stop

R&R kicking in for exceeding the factory set airflow reading, but not for knock!

I never said the 'apparent' knock was related - just that it sounded like an excuse for R&R kicking in as a result of a job not being done 100% right.

As i said, swap out the sensor, you'll soon find out where the issue lies.

I have had a few GTR's and S14's that show high knock figures for no reason, one in particular was a SR20 S14, on the Kmon is was silent, ran a very safe map in it, yet the PFC D-jetro would show up to 50-60 on decel and even at idle would hover around 15-20, at wot it would often hit 95, I went over every squar millimeter of that engine bay, not a single thing loose or contributing. 6 months later I did an engine build for more power, same thing with knock, did not change.

Eventualy I replaced the knock sensor at a regular service and it dropped to about 3-4 at idle and 15 odd on decel with 50-60's at WOT (usualy see 25's to 30's on similar setups) I then replaced the complete knock harness from sensor to ECU, didnt make a difference. I even tried to switch out the PFC's with its sister car running identical setup and still the car im mention would always read close to double,

What I did notice though, if you run a hard core twin plate or tripple plate clutch it can be a very good contributer, SR20's knock sensors usualy go balistic right before/as they chow the teeth off 3rd gear as well. Not saying somthing is wrong with your driveline, just that it could be somthing a little futher down the line thats causing your odd readings.

Good luck, hope you find the problem.

Eventualy I replaced the knock sensor at a regular service

Was this a genuine article or aftermarket. I am presuming that given your circumstances they would be new, not 2nd hand.

Very expensive?

Where from?

Thanks for your replies guys, it is a bit of a grey area i know. Im sure someone else is learning from all this!

people forget that with the SAFC there are always 2 actions for every adjustment.

SO if you get the mixture nice (usually by leaning it out from the factory rich settings) the second action is to the timing table.

Reduce fuel = increse timing

Increase fuel = decrease timing

If you take out too much fuel you generally add too much timing especially around peak torque in the midrange.

Finally if for some reason the car switches over to the low octane map the tuning is done based on the wrong map. A good practice is to run a very aggressive ramp rate once finished then turn the car off for 30seconds and redo the run just to make sure both runs are identical. If it was in the low octane map for the first run the car will most likely knock its head off and be lean on the second run.

I hate SAFC's on anything mildy smart (r34's etc) as it is impossible to get what i consider good results... especially as i monitor the base tables with nistune and see just how average the base figures are to work with.

  • 3 weeks later...
Was this a genuine article or aftermarket. I am presuming that given your circumstances they would be new, not 2nd hand.

Very expensive?

Where from?

Thanks for your replies guys, it is a bit of a grey area i know. Im sure someone else is learning from all this!

Owned , I just had my knock sensors replaced , problem with sensors was found with a Apexi Fc hand controller , cost is $ 350 per sensor from Nissan not including install - big $$$$$$$, must remove exhaust manifold! The other option is to overide the fault with ECU upgrade .

Edited by NISSAN GTR
Owned , I just had my knock sensors replaced , problem with sensors was found with a Apexi Fc hand controller , cost is $ 350 per sensor from Nissan not including install - big $$$$$$$, The other option is to overide the fault with ECU upgrade .
how silly of me . it is the wrong side Edited by NISSAN GTR

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi 🙋‍♂️. Just bought my Unicorn but the interior need some minor work so it would match my expectations ;). I noticed it is hard to get used oem floor mats in good condition so i started to dig if there's any chance to buy set of new ones. I found two websites - nengun and amayama and it looks like one can still buy factory new floor mats in Japan, but thers a small issue. Some mats (i assume genuine, oem ones) are marked as G4900 and these are "discontinued". The ones you can buy are marked as G4911 but i have no idea if these are also oem, made by other producer or some lower quality replacements that looks entirely different. Can anyone help? 😃  P.s. there is also some strange indication - 0V005, 0V015 and 0V505. Any idea what does it mean? Would appreciate any help with this 🙏
    • Hi, Marek here 🙋‍♂️. I finally fulfilled my longtime dream - recently bought Stagea and now waiting for it to arrive in Poland. There's only few of these in my country, and one of the owners  recommended mi this forum as a source of all the info i'd need since now i own one  so here i am.  
    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
×
×
  • Create New...