Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

ive seen the effects of using less octaned fuel..

ive ran 95 for a couple weeks and didnt notice much difference but decided to run 98 to be safe..

a friend on the other hand, used 91 in his sr20det and after a few weeks had big problems with lag, backfiring, and idling really rough..

why have a performance car if you dont want to look after it? its a price we gotta pay.

Sorry Mad RON is RON in whatever country you are in. We used to test RON with a variable compression motor, now it is an IR reading and other hi tech stuff. Mixing 92 and 110 will give about a 100-101 RON so it's ok but levelride I though your fuel would have been cheap enough .

You need to take the cheep fuel out of your tank to get your car going. Skylines cannot have this crap fuel in them unless all the seals in the fuel system have been changed too handle these types of fuel.

The fuel is simply 98octane if the car is set too run stock fuel. What has happened as when you were driving with the cheap fuel in there the seals in the fuel system have swolen up and restricted fuel flow. Thats why you slowly got power loss and when you came too idle the drop in fuel pressure was enough for the fuel supply too cut off and stall the car.

I have seen this exact problem you are describing many times with skylines and a 300zx so i can say go ahead too fix it

Ok so being the noob I am, I've been running 91 octane (Shell or Caltex) for the past 9 months in my car. Idles fine, no misfiring etc. Isn't a rocket, but still felt ok to me performance wise. After being told a few days ago I should be running BP Ultimate 98, I've since done over 500kms with this fuel. Car certainly likes it alot better :), and my gas mileage has gotten way better. Havn't noticed any black soot either on my exhaust. But then again I've only done 500km so far with this fuel.

Have I done any lasting damage to my car by running 91? I knew not to run that E10 rubbish, but figured the different octane levels were for performance only, and not the health and well being of the car.

Sorry Mad RON is RON in whatever country you are in. We used to test RON with a variable compression motor, now it is an IR reading and other hi tech stuff. Mixing 92 and 110 will give about a 100-101 RON so it's ok but levelride I though your fuel would have been cheap enough .

sorry mate but i never said RON did i? i said octane (not quite the same thing). and if you do a bit of research you will find that the US octane ratings ARE different to ours because we go off the RON rating and america goes off (RON + MON)/2. and since the MON rating is generally about 8 less than the RON rating (but not always), when you add the 2 together and then halve it it comes out about 4 less than the RON rating.

RON = Research Octane Number

MON = Motor Octane Number

as for fuel being cheap in america, that is somewhat true, but you also have to remember that the minimum wage there is about half of what it is here.

Ok so being the noob I am, I've been running 91 octane (Shell or Caltex) for the past 9 months in my car. Idles fine, no misfiring etc. Isn't a rocket, but still felt ok to me performance wise. After being told a few days ago I should be running BP Ultimate 98, I've since done over 500kms with this fuel. Car certainly likes it alot better :), and my gas mileage has gotten way better. Havn't noticed any black soot either on my exhaust. But then again I've only done 500km so far with this fuel.

Have I done any lasting damage to my car by running 91? I knew not to run that E10 rubbish, but figured the different octane levels were for performance only, and not the health and well being of the car.

there isn't anything wrong with E10 fuels. i've been running it for a few years now, in various cars, as have others i know, without any troubles at all. generally people who have trouble with it aren't actually having trouble with the fuel but the cleaning properties that the fuel has and it breaks down a lot of the garbage in the fuel tank or the fuel filter and it gets deposited in the injectors. this is normally in cars where the fuel filter hasn't been replaced for a few years and is probably full of crap and not filtering very well anyway. very few people have had issues caused by the fuel itself.

as for performance of different fuels, there is actually very little difference in the actual fuel as far as how much performance it gives you. where the performance comes into it is from the octane rating, which is how hard it is to ignite. the higher the octane rating, the harder it is to ignite, so the more advanced timing you can run. on most modern cars the engine has knock sensors which register any pinging and then retard the timing to save the engine from damage. so if you run a car on the lower octane fuel that was designed for higher octane fuel on lower octane fuel then the ecu will retard the timing and you will have less power, meaning you have to use more accelerator (and therefore more fuel) to accelerate or even just cruise at a fixed speed. that is how you are able to get better fuel economy from higher octane fuels. but if you take a basic car that is designed to run on basic fuel you often won't see any gains from running higher octane fuels.

as for any damage you may have done, if the knock sensors aren't working properly, or the engine is still getting pinging once the ecu retards the timing then it can damage spark plugs or ringlands.

We do actually use a RON and MON in Australia. It's just in the oil industry we use RON for simplicity. Before our 98 RON was released ,years of blending and dyno work was done to get the MON up to a high level. As you know MON is more of a driveabilty scale than RON. Research Octane Number is a comparison of the Platformate or Reformate [or what process is used in Catalytic Reforming to in crease the octane of the HSR ]to N-Heptene scale. The reformate or platformate leaves the units and goes to a Ben sat unit to remove the benzene down to levels mandated by govts. Heavy runs to tankage at around 102-105 RON and the lights go a reactor for conversion of the benzene. All these streams and other rundowns go to the blend tank for testing of RON and MON before release to the public. I can't go into specifics as the blending is proprietory knowledge. Obviously in Queensland all or nearly all your gaso comes from Caltex Lytton or BP Bulwar . A small amount may be imported .or in times of shortage or production problems from Caltex Kurnell or Shell Clyde. Though you may get some from India or SE Asia.

you are still ignoring the fact that US octane ratings will always be about 4 octane lower than here. it is common knowledge and has been for about the past god knows how many years. the fuel companies may still us MON when testing fuel, however when it comes to saying what octane their fuel is the simple say what RON it is. you may have a good knowledge of australian fuels, but you seem to have little knowledge about other countries octane ratings.

a prime example of this would be any cars shipped to th US designed to run on premium fuels would have dramatically lower power outputs if the US octane was actually only 92 RON for the premium fuel. the manufacturers would have to detune all the cars, and infact all cars, not just cars designed to run on premium would have to be detuned. yet they all seem to have the same power outputs and don't get detuned.

I guess that as this started as an australian fuel thread , australian RON was main thread ,until level ride, came in with north american octane. since they use AKI as their basis of their octane figure . Still mixing the lower and the higher octane together you will get an improvement on the lower one. 50/50 would give a very close to mid range of the difference. Yes their ECU would be retuned for the differing fuel specs over here, though there isn't a great number of american cars coming this way compared to cars from SE Asia who use a rating the same of very close to ours. But back to australian octane per the thread, on our cars with closed loop systems with knock sensors you will get more power from the higher RON and noticable at that. so use the highest RON you can afford. Interestingly , the sales of 95 ron are up due to govt mandating E 10 with the phasing out of 91. I hope I have a passing knowledge of Australian fuels and manufacture as I have been making it for long enough.

  • 3 weeks later...

depends on what mods you have. if your car is completely stock then you could get away with it, but 98 is the better option. if you are running higher boost or aftermarket ecu (that was tuned on 98) then you'll want to stick with 98. unfortunately that is just one of the many ways that owning a turbo import will empty your wallet.

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Back again. I returned to Japan in Jul/Aug to spend time with the car on my birthday and remind myself what all the sacrifice and compromise is for. It happened to line up with the monthly morning meet in Okutama, which I have been wanting to go to for a long time. It's a unique event at a unique spot with really rare, interesting, and quirky cars. It's where all the oldheads and OGs gather. The nighttime scene at DKF certainly has its place and should be experienced if you're into cars, but there's too much bad attention and negativity around it now. IMO the better time is Sunday morning at DKF or Okutama; it's more chill and relaxed. I'm glad I was finally able to go, but not sure it's worth the drive from all the way from Nagoya immediately the day before, unless I was already staying in Tokyo for the days right before the meet, because you have to wake up quite early to make it in time. Funnily enough though I didn't drive the car all that much this trip because it was just too damn hot. While there were zero issues and running temps were nominal and the A/C was strong, RBs already run crazy hot as it is. Sure, it took it all like a champ but something about driving these cars in the ridiculous heat/humidity bothers me and makes me feel like I'm asking too much of it. I'm just me being weird and treating the car like a living thing with feelings; I'm mechanically sympathetic to a fault. Instead I was mainly driving something else around - a KX4(silver) 2001 X-Trail GT, that I acquired in May. There's a few different flavors to choose from with Xs, but visually it's the Nissan version of the Honda CR-V. Mechanically it's a whole different story as this, being the top-trim GT, has an SR20VET mated to a four-speed auto and full-time AWD! It was a very affordable buy in exceptional condition inside and out, with very low mileage...only 48k kms. Most likely it was owned by an older person who kept it garaged and well-maintained, so I'm really happy with how it all worked out. It literally needs zero attention at the moment, albeit except for some minor visual touch-ups. I wanted something quirky, interesting, and practical and for sure it handily delivers on all three of those aspects. I was immediately able to utilize the cargo and passenger capacity to its full extent. It's a lot of fun to drive and is quite punchy through 1st and 2nd. It's very unassuming -in the twisty bits it's a lot more composed than one would think at a glance- and it'll be even better once I get better tires on it(yes, it's an SUV but still a little boat-y for my liking). So...now I have two golden-era Nissans in silver. One sports car and one that does everything else; the perfect two-car solution I think👍 The rest of the trip...I was able to turn my stressed brain off and enjoy it, although I didn't quite get to do as much as I thought. I did some interesting things, met some interesting people, and happened into some interesting situations however, that's all for another post though only if people really want to know. Project-wise, I went back to Mine's again to discuss more plans and am hoping to wrap that up real soon; keep watching this space if that interests you. Additionally, while working in the tormenting sweatbox that is the warehouse, I was able to organize most of the myriad of parts that my friend is storing for me along with the cars, and the 34 has a nice little spot carved out for it: And since it can get so stupid hot in there, that made it all the more easy -after I was standing there looking at the car and said 'f**k it'- to finally remove all the damn gauges that have mostly been an eyesore all this time. Huzzah. The heat basically makes the adhesive backing on the gauge mounts more pliable to work with, so it was far less stressful getting this done. I didn't fully clean it up or chase the wiring though; that will happen once I have the car in closer possession. Another major reason to remove all that stuff is to give people less reasons to get in my car and steal s**t while it's being exported/imported when/if the time comes, which leads us to my next point... ...and that is even though it's time in Japan is technically almost up since it's a November car and the X would be coming in March, I'm still not entirely sure where my life and career is headed; I don't really know what the future looks like and where I'm going to end up. I feel there's a great deal of uncertainty with me and as a result of that, it feels like I'm at a crossroads moreso now than any point in my life thus far and there are some choices I need to make. Yes, I've had some years to consider things and prepare myself, however too much has happened in that time to maintain confidence and everything feels so up in the air; tenuous one might say. Simply put, there's just too much nonsense going on right now from multiple vectors. Admittedly, I'm struggling to stay in the game and keep my eyes on the prize. So much so in fact, that very recently I came the closest I ever have before to calling it quits outright; selling everything and moving on and not looking back. The astute among you will pick up on key subtext within this paragraph. In the meantime I've still managed to slowly acquire some final bits for the car, but it feels nice knowing there's not much left to get and I'm almost across that finish line; I have almost everything I'll ever want for my interpretation and expression on what it is I think an R34 should be. 'til later.
    • Thanks for that, hadn’t used my brain enough to think about that. 
    • Also playing with fire if they start to flow more air down low than what the stock twins can. It's not even up top you need to worry, it can be at 3000rpm and part throttle and it's getting way more flow than it should.
    • Any G40/1000 or G40/1250 results out there?  
    • You still want a proper tune on the stock ECU though. Stock tune + stock ECU with GT-SS/-9s is probably playing with fire if you're running more than stock airflow/power.
×
×
  • Create New...