Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

thank you savman, im going to go with the 14 then, i really like the rear to have a solid lock, dont mind it on the street.

nzm - yes they are alloy. if you have gtst and want to upgrade to alloy knuckles you need z32, not gtr

  • Replies 136
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i have the 2007 nismo catalog, but there are (4) kits available? take a look, do you know the differences?

could you please you ask your mate if he got the 8kg or 12kg? and serrated disc or smooth disc?

the one you want is either 3843S-RS520 (45ft/lb) or 3843S-RS521 (75ft/lb). for your car I'd go with the RS521 kit.

the one you want is either 3843S-RS520 (45ft/lb) or 3843S-RS521 (75ft/lb). for your car I'd got with the RS521 kit.

yes, thank you beer baron!! that is exactly what i was thinking, sent an email to a nissan buddy of mine to try and get that for me. What do you ascertain to be th difference between serrated disc and smooth disc? i suppose the serratted disc would run slightly cooler due to having more gear oil between the plates

no worries. to be honest I've never used the RS650 or RS651 kits and in fact I think only the RS651 is still available. I've only used the RS520/521 kits and used a fair few and they are great. Definitely without the serrations it will alter the oil flow through the plates and I'd say the ones with serrations will lock up a lot harder even though you end up with less surface area as they are able to dissipate the oil. you can see the patterns on the 520/521 kits alternate between plates with some running concentricly around the disk face and the next ones running out from the centre. it must make them grip better.

I'd say you'll be happy with the RS521 kit and they are a great bang for buck mod. it's the same kit for 32/33 and 34 GTR as long as they are not the active diff models.

no worries. to be honest I've never used the RS650 or RS651 kits and in fact I think only the RS651 is still available. I've only used the RS520/521 kits and used a fair few and they are great. Definitely without the serrations it will alter the oil flow through the plates and I'd say the ones with serrations will lock up a lot harder even though you end up with less surface area as they are able to dissipate the oil. you can see the patterns on the 520/521 kits alternate between plates with some running concentricly around the disk face and the next ones running out from the centre. it must make them grip better.

I'd say you'll be happy with the RS521 kit and they are a great bang for buck mod. it's the same kit for 32/33 and 34 GTR as long as they are not the active diff models.

that is the best info ive received in years THANK YOU!!!

Im really excited to use this kit in my R32/R33 rear diff, but had no idea it would fit the R34 diff also! Would the vspec be the active diff model you are referring to? We have an R34 here which i would love to do this to, I had no idea this kit would work there also. Thanks for the info

btw some great info here on link lengths: http://www.nismo.co.jp/en/products/competi...suspension.html

Edited by Full-Race Geoff

yep, Vspec and Vspec II have the active diff. only the non-vspec R34 GTR diff is suitable for this kit. and just confirming of course it's not suitable for any GTST diffs, they are all viscous or some models have the active diff same as the Vspec GTRs do. 33 GTR Vspec is active diff too. basically any of the plain jane mechanical 2 way GTR diffs are suitable, 32/33/34. anything else is not.

yeah the pro circuit link nismo kits are quite good (albeit a bit mild). that's the same thing we do to get circuit spec alignment. shorten the castor rod (obviously for circuit we usually got a bit further than those arms), lengthen the lower control arm a little which helps with camber, shorten the upper arms for the same reason. they also provide that inner upper control arm mount which moves the angle of the upper control arm so it's not getting twisted so much as it does when you are running more castor. from memory it also mounts a little higher too to help correct geometry for lowered cars. unfortunately you can't get that re-designed mount on it's own you have to buy the kit with the mount, castor rod and lower control arm which sucks if you already have adjustable castor rods and lower arms.

oh, and you're welcome! (^_^) always happy to help a fellow traveller. it's what we do here. it's what this forum is for. :ninja: we share a lot of knowledge and ideas here and you've certainly shared plenty with the development of your own car.

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

The new issue of modified magazine is on news stands, check it out!!

36888_407591589469_257478014469_4218029_5109081_n.jpg

We got 2nd place in AWD class. :whoops:

Full-Race has recently received a lot of PMs and emails now that the new issue of the Tuner shootout is on newstands. The updated R14 portion of the Full-Race.com site is coming next week, but to answer the basic questions, ill copy/paste the beginning text for you:

Full-Race.com -- R14 DIY HOW-TO info

this portion of the Full-Race.com website breaks down the R14 conversion in detail. Pictures and information help to make it clear how to do this AWD RB26 swap. If you've done a few different motor swaps, installed some turbokits, know how to use a hand-drill + welder (220 Volt Mig welder recommended), and are committed/prepared to take on a big project you can tackle this install. If you dont know how to do swaps or install aftermarket turbokits, do not start this conversion until you have more experience or better understand the process.

A) Required BIG parts:

-(95-98) S14 Chassis, S15 will work too. S13 will NOT work for this swap!! <

-R32 GTR front clip w/ complete front suspension and complete rear subframe <easy to find at any big JDM importers/yards>

-Full-Race R14 DIY kit

^^^If you can acquire all of the above items^^^ all the big purchases are out of the way.

B) Full-Race R14 kit consists of these parts required to do the swap:

R14 Frame Rails (Left and Right side)

R14 billet frame blocks

Subframe Bolts/washers

LHD RB26 steering rack

Transmission Mount

Frame side Transmission Mount-plate

Front Upper-Control-Arm Structure (Upper Shock mounts)

Lower Shock mounts

1-piece Driveshaft (Aluminum or Steel)

1/2" Eye-to-Eye Coilovers - Moton or Koni (Circletrack or Road Race style heim-mounted)

Here is how it all works, and enough instructions to get you going:

First, start by getting the R32 GTR clip fully disassembled. We will be using almost every major component from this clip. Keep all the suspension control arms, brakes, hubs and bolts sorted, with their respective hardware. The engine and transmission should be inspected and it is recommended to refresh it - new timing belt, clutch, oil pump, etc. At this point, the subframe should be unbolted from the motor mounts and then cleaned/prepped for the swap....

to be continued. Thanks for the interest in the R14 conversions!

  • 1 year later...
  • 7 months later...

would really love to hear how this is going now. inspiring build, I want more updates, NOW =D

Ive been busting my arse to get the car ready for the race this year, March 30/31. One of the biggest changes for me was the addition of the ETS-pro center diff controller (torque split controller). I began my installation last night, hope to have the install completed later today

479790_10150613002801129_575236128_9521887_1286419394_n.jpg

once my new PS pump arrives i can test it out!

pulling hours to get r14.1 in the modified tuner shootout march 30th. long story short, I was busting my ass to get my daily driver evo project ready for the modified tuner shootout. I hoped to run my evo for this as its debut race. unfortunately there was a mixup and modified mag put me down to enter the R14 (they didnt know i was building an evo) and said there are too many evo entries... if I wanted to be in the race i have to race in my nissan. So the heat is on, im getting the R14.1 ready again. There is a chance an evo will drop out, and in that case ill try to race 2 cars

here is the update:

-engine/fuel system/cooling system all remain untouched. nothing related to the engine had any damage from the fire. same intake manifold/ itb's and fuel system. i would like a better ECU, but oh well

-turbo manifold changed along with smaller MVS wastegates in a compact location - this allows for recircing the wastegates for emissions compliance (similar to our sr20 twinscroll kits) here is a pic of the work in progress:

423337_10150689838477527_157954962526_11581713_476593263_n.jpg

-Turbo changes: installing an EFR 8374 turbo

-brakes are the same brembo G35/350Z brembo tracks ive had forever with raybestos race pads. I may use project Mu club racer pads instead (those are on my evo right now and amazing). Not sure if i will have an ebrake or not?

-suspension remains unchanged, moton double adjustables. found a bind at the front tension rod... i stole an idea from midori and it backfired. went back to OEM, no problems. May go softer on the spring rate to accomodate having to use a street tire instead of slicks

-ditched stock p/s pump, went to 1992 toyota MR2 electric powersteering pump. currently it is located in the trunk. the fire happened from my aluminum exhaust bursting and burning up a p/s hose. I ran a complicated AWD hydraulic circuit to control the torque split and p/s rack all ran through the p/s pump, so when the hose burst a large volume of ATF sprayed all over the bottom of the chassis and the exhaust lit it up. By eliminating the entire ATF system and proximity of p/s pump from the turbo and exhaust i have removed that possibility for fire. these are the changes i've made:

-installed OE nissan atessa system with new ETS-pro g-sensor software. this is the same thing as DCCD-pro that GST uses to run STI driveline in their gc chassis. info here: http://www.gtr.co.uk/forum/1486450-post53.html

-ive rerouted all the power steering and torque split lines so they are with the fuel lines - far away from the exhaust! (no more fire).

-kognition rear wing, braced to chassis? not sure if i will leave the wing off becuase this is a low speed track now (firebird west) and ill save the wing for R14.2? decisions

-removed sunroof, replaced with kognition carbon sunroof plug

-i installed a new OE fuel tank and replaced fuel lines just to be safe

-removed stereo

-removed heavy ass front splitter mount, will attach splitter to small lightweight aluminum frame or not at all (havent decided yet)

IF TIME PERMITS:

-carbonetic triple carbon clutch and rear LSD (already have a quaife front diff)

-R34 GTR 6 speed transmission and driveshaft

my car doesnt have only 2 small full-race stickers on it, and will stay that way for the comp.

weve got work to do!

as for the mounting of the splitter I have about 0.000001% percent of your Fab knowledge BUT..what I used for my main mounting of my bar/splitter was some 200lb fishing leader (I have it around as we are big on game fishing) and mounted it to the rad suppot panel with some nice stainless turnbuckles. tensioned them right up and its really sturdy. shouldnt be too rigid if it bottoms out (it shouldn't) I just mounted some nice eyelets to the splitter and made up the cables and yeah. 500 grams of bracing and with four of them its mighty strong. anyways I'm keen to see what you come up with!

cheers, Jack

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...