Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 122
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Are we talking about what i have or whats on ebay... so whos going to tell me what iv got???

I'm not planning on building the engine around turbos as i said earlie. Sell them off and start on a new stroker.

well from what you are saying and the ID tag and the 10 blade turbine it seems like they are 2835s. but considering how awful they are even in external gate form they are going to be even worse in restrictive tiny, low mount internal gate housings. they will be laggy as hell and with the smaller housings you will be loosing top end potential too (compared to the ext gate high mount versions).

the T04Z idea is a bad one too. they are old tech, rubbish turbo. they are just not a well matched combo on a RB26.

the GOOD options are:

twin 2530s or -5s for street/track/drag

twin GTSS -7s/R34 N1s for street/track

or if you want single look at some of the borgwarner offerings, or some new tech garret stuff. there are much better singles than a T04Z.

I don't see the problem in building an engine around a set of turbos. Actually it's a fairly good philosophical perspective for an engine build.

Atmospheric engines are built around the physics (pressure, flow behaviour, density) of our existing atmosphere.

They look to be 2835's. 10blade turbine wheel at 56mm, say 2835 on the housing, measured as 71mm compressor (56 trim) on the housing. Probably sitting in small T3 housing blended into a T28 footprint - just like 2835's.

I give up.. I'm gonna take the all your advice that they aren't what they seem ill put them on my engine. With stock manifolds and stock cams. And if they are 2560 or what every the fark you think they might be i should see reasonable response with decent power... if not not my rep that's gonna take a hit ill be sayig your the ones who gave me the info. ''Skyline guru's'' I'm also going to discard the info 2 turbo places have given me about them. Cause i have had enough of this i told yo so shit.

Your right, me and all my info gathering is wrong... HAPPY NOW. Oh I'm sorry for disagreeing with the ''skyline guru's''

Only other thing to check to completely confirm is the turbine exducer diameter (tip diameter). Typically 84 trim so 52mm (51.8mm).

And hell why not confirm the inducer diameter of the compressor wheel? Should be 53mm for 56trim.

http://www.hksusa.com/products/?id=709

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
    • OK, if it idles at 1000+ with the AAC, its not an idle airflow problem. The cold start valve just gives extra air when the engine is cold, but you have enough air without it to idle at 1000. I think you are back to a fuel problem, sorry. Can you see the fuel pressure staying constant or does it drop as the revs drop to a stall?  
×
×
  • Create New...