Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

btw cas...

http://page7.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/g91619685

17x9.5" 114.3 PCD.

$260 buy it now for 3 + shipping costs + agent costs + international freight.

use two of em and have one as a spare. or get streeter to just chuck one out and send 2 to save on shipping.

problem is that that's too small. Can find 15s, 16s n 17s but no 18s to suit gtr. No 18s at all actually

How much do you reckon this 'car' would go for thesedays?

limited edition convertible model AE86. NOTHING to do... just get in and sliiiide.

so umm shan i mught need your thread tap things. got the centercaps drilled off, but the threaded bits of the screws are still in there

why the fuck did you drill the caps off? that just makes it harder to pull out.

oh, I thought you ran 17's on yours. my bad.

all good man thanks for looking :) did u know the guy who bought the damn things ran spacers underneath. Only 5ml tho. I had no idea lol

reply to my facey msg Nick! :) no love

sorry dude been absolutely swamped with work this week, and busy all weekend

When do you need it done by? maybe i can do it on wednesday next week during the night or next weekend?

hamish - thanks for the tip with streeter :) import monster quoted 1850 which i was already impressed by - streeter just got back to me as below:

Work CR Kais

Bronze

5x114.3

18 9.5

22730yen each

If shipped by Sea Post (shipping time 6-9 weeks)

Rough costs on that would be something like this…

Cost of item ¥90,920

Ship item to me ¥0

Bank fee to pay seller ¥630

My commission ¥7,000

Shipping to Aus, Europe or U.S. via Sea assuming 13 kg x4 ¥31,200

* (I could be off with the weight but what ever it costs to send Ill

pass on to you)

ROUGH TOTAL in JPY: ¥129,750

*If not in Aus or you would prefer to use PAYPAL: plus 4% paypal fees ¥134,940

ROUGH TOTAL in AUD: $1,674

*depending on exchange rate. current rate is 80.8

pretty happy with that but 9 weeks is a bit worrying. means i need to find loaners in interim. assuming i get them.

...i want to.

niggaroj, come over saturday, I'll be working on the ceffy.

niggaroj, come over saturday, I'll be working on the ceffy.

I use laurence (jesse's old housemate) and also streeter when L's not available and they're ace. never had any dramas. it's not 9 weeks. 9 weeks is worst case. I get my stuff in a month usually.

niggaroj, come over saturday, I'll be working on the ceffy.

I use laurence (jesse's old housemate) and also streeter when L's not available and they're ace. never had any dramas. it's not 9 weeks. 9 weeks is worst case. I get my stuff in a month usually.

thats pretty comforting, thanks :)

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well you could certainly buy or build an enclosure for a pod in that corner of the bay. It is absolutely vital that there is a nice big opening to let cold air in to it from the front or underside, otherwise it will just pull air in around the edges from the bay, and if that air is hot, you gain nothing from enclosing the pod. There is lots of good evidence around (including on here, see posts by @Kinkstaah for example) showing that pods pulling hot air from the bay is only a problem when you're static or slow in traffic, and that as soon as you get the car up and moving the air being grabbed by the pod cools down. Although that will obviously vary from car to car, whether there is a flow of cold air to the pod or if it all has to come through the radiator area, etc etc. Obviously, the whole exercise requires as much thought as anything else does. Doing the lazy thing will often end up being the dumb thing. The stock GTT airbox has a cold air snorkel to feed it from over the radiator. Shows that Nissan were thinking. The GT airbox is upside down compared to the turbo one, yeah? Inlet at the bottom, AFM/exit on the lid? That might make it harder to route the turbo inlet pipe using the GT airbox than a turbo one. That would probably be the main reason I'd consider not using it, not that it is too small and restrictive. I'm looking at a photo of one now and the inlet opening seems nice and large. Also seems to have the same type of snorkel that the turbo one has. Maybe all that's required is to make a less restrictive snorkel/cold air inlet, perhaps by punching down through the guard like I did.
    • Also seen this as an option 
    • I get you, we’ll see I’m aiming for 200ish kw now and hopefully 300rwkw down the line after some upgrades maybe like headstuds, E85 flex fuel etc  so trying to make it final for that now, I can get a GTT airbox for $280 so it’s not too bad but not sure if there’s better ways to spend that money. I seen online they say pod filter which isn’t enclosed isn’t good especially for a plus T.      hard to say what to do
    • Meh. How much power can you make from a +T anyway? I wouldn't have though it would be enough to challenge the airbox. It's not as if it's tiny compared with the turbo one. As to putting a pod in a stock airbox .... it's not the filter element that would be restrictive. It would be the air inlet to the box that would be the narrow point, which you could open up regardless of what element was inside. On my R32 I opened up the sort of triangular opening in the bottom front corner of the box, deformed (heated, moulded) some 4" stormwater pipe to fit to that opening and punched a 4" hole down through the inner guard to the spot where the stock intercooler used to be. This was purely in the search for a cold intake, but you could do something similar if you need to open up the inlet side of it. The AFM tube size is the same for both NA and turbo, so the outlet from the airbox is same same anyway. If you're going to do the right thing, then an aftermarket ECU won't care about the AFM (ie, you can get rid of it). But even if it was still there, people pull >300rwkW through them all day, and I suspect you won't be going there.
    • R34 RB25de Neo by the way ^ 
×
×
  • Create New...